Good news. Cryptic, but good.Charles L. Cotton wrote:I spoke too soon about the Zerwas amendment. I can't say more now.
Chas.
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Good news. Cryptic, but good.Charles L. Cotton wrote:I spoke too soon about the Zerwas amendment. I can't say more now.
Chas.
ScooterSissy wrote:My question wasn't about Strickland, it was about the cheesburger comment. Sorry I didn't make that more clear.jerry_r60 wrote:That at least makes clear what you were after. I'll not defend or attack the sarcasm, I'm not interested in that at this point. I did answer your question about why some of us are not fans of Stickland.ScooterSissy wrote:Oh, absolutely. I recognized it as exactly what it was. That's why I brought up the "childish" reference. The comment really had nothing to do with this bill, and was just another ill placed slap. I would hope most folks are above that.jerry_r60 wrote:Surely you can see that there was sarcasm in the cheeseburger comment. You seem to be reacting to it as a literal statement.ScooterSissy wrote:He just spoke, doing his job. Not out for cheeseburgers.K5GU wrote:What comments would you be referring to? I like cheeseburgers too. But I don't act like a child on the Texas House floor.ScooterSissy wrote:Some of you folks really don't seem to like Strickland. The "cheeseburger" comment sounds much like the childishness comments that have been going around.K5GU wrote:I think a member on the floor has to move a "point of order" to enforce the time limit. If they aren't paying attention or have all gone out to join Stickland for a cheeseburger, they won't be able to declare the point of order.TexasJohnBoy wrote:There's no time limits being enforced either. They aren't going to get past amendment 1.
Why?
I don't much care for Strickland, but he wasn't out hunting cheeseburgers, and the comment wouldn't be allowed against a forum member, so why would it be made against him?
Is it open season here on those that are simply not liked?
Mr. Cotton, I really appreciate your updates and all the hard work but unless these amendments stop before midnight and there is a vote, this is just dressing.Charles L. Cotton wrote:I spoke too soon about the Zerwas amendment. I can't say more now.
Chas.
Don't do this again. Stickland isn't a Forum Member, but the people you are insulting are and it won't be tolerated.ScooterSissy wrote:Some of you folks really don't seem to like Strickland. The "cheeseburger" comment sounds much like the childishness comments that have been going around.K5GU wrote:I think a member on the floor has to move a "point of order" to enforce the time limit. If they aren't paying attention or have all gone out to join Stickland for a cheeseburger, they won't be able to declare the point of order.TexasJohnBoy wrote:There's no time limits being enforced either. They aren't going to get past amendment 1.
Why?
Charles L. Cotton wrote:
Don't do this again. Stickland isn't a Forum Member, but the people you are insulting are and it won't be tolerated.
Chas.
Yep, that's what is going to happen.cprems wrote:Mr. Cotton, I really appreciate your updates and all the hard work but unless these amendments stop before midnight and there is a vote, this is just dressing.Charles L. Cotton wrote:I spoke too soon about the Zerwas amendment. I can't say more now.
Chas.
They're going to run out the clock.
RoyGBiv wrote:Good news. Cryptic, but good.Charles L. Cotton wrote:I spoke too soon about the Zerwas amendment. I can't say more now.
Chas.
We all know it, yet I just can't stop watching, I guess in hopes of the improbable...I must be a masochist.Charles L. Cotton wrote:Yep, that's what is going to happen.cprems wrote:Mr. Cotton, I really appreciate your updates and all the hard work but unless these amendments stop before midnight and there is a vote, this is just dressing.Charles L. Cotton wrote:I spoke too soon about the Zerwas amendment. I can't say more now.
Chas.
They're going to run out the clock.
Chas.
he's going somewhere, but I'm not really sure where at this point. he sort of ended that whole thing with a "gotcha" tone....Beiruty wrote:What kind of this stupid questions this rep is asking. He repeats he got it and still continue with his stupid line.
So you're saying that if there are, say, 110 amendments, and at midnight they're only at amendment 37, SB11 dies right then and there....?Charles L. Cotton wrote:Yep, that's what is going to happen.cprems wrote:Mr. Cotton, I really appreciate your updates and all the hard work but unless these amendments stop before midnight and there is a vote, this is just dressing.Charles L. Cotton wrote:I spoke too soon about the Zerwas amendment. I can't say more now.
Chas.
They're going to run out the clock.
Chas.