Call-To-Action: HB910

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Locked
User avatar

SewTexas
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 12
Posts: 3509
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 11:52 pm
Location: Alvin
Contact:

Re: Call-To-Action: HB910

#151

Post by SewTexas »

the 2nd doesn't say that I can't have a machine gun. my HOA does
~Tracy
Gun control is what you talk about when you don't want to talk about the truth ~ Colion Noir

mr1337
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 1201
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:17 pm
Location: Austin

Re: Call-To-Action: HB910

#152

Post by mr1337 »

SewTexas wrote:the 2nd doesn't say that I can't have a machine gun. my HOA does
Does your HOA really say that? Why?
Keep calm and carry.

Licensing (n.) - When government takes away your right to do something and sells it back to you.
User avatar

SewTexas
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 12
Posts: 3509
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 11:52 pm
Location: Alvin
Contact:

Re: Call-To-Action: HB910

#153

Post by SewTexas »

mr1337 wrote:
SewTexas wrote:the 2nd doesn't say that I can't have a machine gun. my HOA does
Does your HOA really say that? Why?
it's not really the machine gun....it's the tank I want to mount it on that's the problem :coolgleamA:
~Tracy
Gun control is what you talk about when you don't want to talk about the truth ~ Colion Noir

mr1337
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 1201
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:17 pm
Location: Austin

Re: Call-To-Action: HB910

#154

Post by mr1337 »

HB910 postponed until 6PM
Keep calm and carry.

Licensing (n.) - When government takes away your right to do something and sells it back to you.

Ruark
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 1806
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 8:11 pm

Re: Call-To-Action: HB910

#155

Post by Ruark »

During the break... what do you guys think? Does an open carrier's going through the Capitol metal detector present probable cause to detain and be asked for a CHL?
-Ruark

Scott Farkus
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 410
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:18 pm
Location: Austin

Re: Call-To-Action: HB910

#156

Post by Scott Farkus »

Ruark wrote:During the break... what do you guys think? Does an open carrier's going through the Capitol metal detector present probable cause to detain and be asked for a CHL?
Yes. It's a stupid question designed to obfuscate the issue. Take the amendment down and let's finish this.
Last edited by Scott Farkus on Fri May 22, 2015 3:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar

joe817
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 10
Posts: 9316
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 7:13 pm
Location: Arlington

Re: Call-To-Action: HB910

#157

Post by joe817 »

Ruark wrote:During the break... what do you guys think? Does an open carrier's going through the Capitol metal detector present probable cause to detain and be asked for a CHL?
As I understand it, CHL holders don't go through the metal detector lines. There's another line staffed by DPS they go through, and bypassess the metal detectors. DPS officer checks your CHL and passes you through.
Diplomacy is the Art of Letting Someone Have Your Way
TSRA
Colt Gov't Model .380

Scott Farkus
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 410
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:18 pm
Location: Austin

Re: Call-To-Action: HB910

#158

Post by Scott Farkus »

There is but you don't necessarily have to go through it. You could go through the metal detectors if you wanted to, but why anybody would if they were carrying is beyond me.
Last edited by Scott Farkus on Fri May 22, 2015 3:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.

mr1337
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 1201
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:17 pm
Location: Austin

Re: Call-To-Action: HB910

#159

Post by mr1337 »

joe817 wrote:
Ruark wrote:During the break... what do you guys think? Does an open carrier's going through the Capitol metal detector present probable cause to detain and be asked for a CHL?
As I understand it, CHL holders don't go through the metal detector lines. There's another line staffed by DPS they go through, and bypassess the metal detectors. DPS officer checks your CHL and passes you through.
You are correct.

CHL holders have to present their license to enter the Capitol with their concealed handgun. They would be required to do so with their openly carried handgun as well.
Scott Farkus wrote:There is but you don't necessarily have to go through it. You could go through the metal detectors if you wanted to.
Haven't tried that, but they take your CHL and run it through a magnetic strip reader near the CHL line. It will pull up your license info and picture.
Last edited by mr1337 on Fri May 22, 2015 3:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Keep calm and carry.

Licensing (n.) - When government takes away your right to do something and sells it back to you.
User avatar

Robert91RS
Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:49 am
Location: DFW

Re: Call-To-Action: HB910

#160

Post by Robert91RS »

joe817 wrote:
Ruark wrote:During the break... what do you guys think? Does an open carrier's going through the Capitol metal detector present probable cause to detain and be asked for a CHL?
As I understand it, CHL holders don't go through the metal detector lines. There's another line staffed by DPS they go through, and bypassess the metal detectors. DPS officer checks your CHL and passes you through.
Exactly. So they're redirected to the correct line where they either present the license or get turned away.
User avatar

safety1
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 23
Posts: 595
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 8:13 am

Re: Call-To-Action: HB910

#161

Post by safety1 »

We need an organized effort or a CTA, who cares about metal detectors or the Capital building for that matter.
WE NEED THIS BILL PASSED.....HELP!!!
We must reject the idea that every time a law’s broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions. ~ Ronald Reagan ~
NRA - Life Member
User avatar

Robert91RS
Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:49 am
Location: DFW

Re: Call-To-Action: HB910

#162

Post by Robert91RS »

safety1 wrote:We need an organized effort or a CTA, who cares about metal detectors or the Capital building for that matter.
WE NEED THIS BILL PASSED.....HELP!!!
What are our options? How do we get Huffines to withdraw his amendment?

v7a
Banned
Posts in topic: 17
Posts: 371
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 6:29 pm

Re: Call-To-Action: HB910

#163

Post by v7a »

Robert91RS wrote:What are our options? How do we get Huffines to withdraw his amendment?
Call and email his office:
512-463-0116
Don.Huffines@senate.state.tx.us
User avatar

joe817
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 10
Posts: 9316
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 7:13 pm
Location: Arlington

Re: Call-To-Action: HB910

#164

Post by joe817 »

Robert91RS wrote:
safety1 wrote:We need an organized effort or a CTA, who cares about metal detectors or the Capital building for that matter.
WE NEED THIS BILL PASSED.....HELP!!!
What are our options? How do we get Huffines to withdraw his amendment?
Read this thread and call!! I just did!

http://texaschlforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=133&t=77720" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Diplomacy is the Art of Letting Someone Have Your Way
TSRA
Colt Gov't Model .380

Ruark
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 1806
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 8:11 pm

Re: Call-To-Action: HB910

#165

Post by Ruark »

mr1337 wrote: CHL holders have to present their license to enter the Capitol with their concealed handgun. They would be required to do so with their openly carried handgun as well.
I'm not so sure. The whole issue with those metal detectors and that "CHL line" was that a good number of the legislators were CC'ing. Remember, ANY time you set off a metal detector, they have to determine what set it off. When the CC'ers set off the metal detectors, they had to remove (and therefore, expose) their guns, which understandably was quite awkward, as well as violating the requirement of maintaining concealment. So they created the "CHL line" - you notice that when you go through that line, they don't ask to see your gun, because it has to remain concealed, and you notice there's no metal detector. The original purpose of the CHL line is not to confirm that an individual has a CHL, it's to enable CC'ers to enter the Capitol without exposing their weapons.

In the suggested case, however, it's no longer illegal to expose your firearm, so you should be able to either put it in the plastic tray along with your belt and wristwatch, or wear it and be wanded, or, if you're carrying concealed, raise your coat to show why the detector went off. There's no probable cause to suspect that the individual has been, is, or will be involved in criminal activity, so....?

This is my hypothesis, and I may be wrong. But I think it's a good question, albeit one with a lot of knee-jerk responses.

I wonder if that guy would have brought up this question even if Huffines hadn't proposed this amendment.
Last edited by Ruark on Fri May 22, 2015 4:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-Ruark
Locked

Return to “2015 Legislative Session”