TVGuy wrote:Might limit the number of people that stick around to testify.SewTexas wrote:15 mins after adjournment, so it's gonna be a late night.
Sen. Huffman said "I have no idea when that's going to be"
that's a really good point
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
TVGuy wrote:Might limit the number of people that stick around to testify.SewTexas wrote:15 mins after adjournment, so it's gonna be a late night.
Sen. Huffman said "I have no idea when that's going to be"
Disappointing that the Senate has decided to screw those of us who live in Democrat-controlled cities.NotRPB wrote:@chucklindell now50 seconds ago
#HB910 will be substituted to REMOVE House amendment banning police stops solely to check CHL for open carry, @EstesForTexas says. #txlege
That's a bummer, but if the police want to waste my time I am happy to waste theirs. Also, I think with OC, that I will be better protected, I'm sure they will follow OCers around in the beginning to hassle them. It's OK, with all the police following me around I think they might actually be around when you need them or better yet with OC and Police presence there will likely be no trouble in the first place.NotRPB wrote:@chucklindell now50 seconds ago
#HB910 will be substituted to REMOVE House amendment banning police stops solely to check CHL for open carry, @EstesForTexas says. #txlege
I'd like the amendment to stay buy if I'm in a place with a large LEO presence, I'm most likely concealed anyway.LSUTiger wrote:That's a bummer, but if the police want to waste my time I am happy to waste theirs. Also, I think with OC, that I will be better protected, I'm sure they will follow OCers around in the beginning to hassle them. It's OK, with all the police following me around I think they might actually be around when you need them or better yet with OC and Police presence there will likely be no trouble in the first place.NotRPB wrote:@chucklindell now50 seconds ago
#HB910 will be substituted to REMOVE House amendment banning police stops solely to check CHL for open carry, @EstesForTexas says. #txlege
I feel safer already. Let's hope OC final makes it through the process!
If the take away here is the House will move forward with SB11, I'll take the trade.NotRPB wrote:http://www.mystatesman.com/news/news/op ... men/nmJYB/
in part:
By Chuck Lindell - American-Statesman Staff
A bill allowing for openly carried handguns will be stripped of a House amendment that bans police stops to check for concealed handgun licenses when the legislation is considered by a Senate committee Monday, the bill’s Senate sponsor told the American-Statesman.
Sen. Craig Estes, R-Wichita Falls, said the amendment will be removed from House Bill 910 at the request of Sen. Joan Huffman, R-Houston, who is chairwoman of the State Affairs Committee.
So that it can pass possibly ...
Let's get rid of the 4th Amendment then. If you're not doing anything wrong, you shouldn't mind the police searching your car or home. Better yet, let's get rid of the right to an attorney. If you're innocent, you don't need one.safety1 wrote:If you are not doing anything wrong...what does it matter?
If you have a valid CHL and are doing nothing wrong....What does it matter?arthurcw wrote:So, "Don't go to Austin and OC." Basically.
Let's not jump to conclusions here. Remember Chuck Lindell is the same Chuck who previously declared that campus carry was going to be attached to open carry in an attempt to progress the bill when in fact it was completely false. Let's pause the discussion now before it ends up spreading wrong information and confusing people who are only able to stay informed by reading tidbits of updates.NotRPB wrote:@chucklindell now50 seconds ago
#HB910 will be substituted to REMOVE House amendment banning police stops solely to check CHL for open carry, @EstesForTexas says. #txlege
Because freedom.safety1 wrote: If you are not doing anything wrong...what does it matter? Show proof and move on, it's really that easy.
We come back in 2 years and get it removed.