TexasCajun wrote:... But this latest stunt taints all of that hard work.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7824f/7824f0ea3df4a97d9b04cc91a6c32f49be551c28" alt="I Agree :iagree:"
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
TexasCajun wrote:... But this latest stunt taints all of that hard work.
Jumping Frog wrote:TexasCajun wrote:... But this latest stunt taints all of that hard work.
Once the information becomes part of a court record and barring it being "sealed" by court order, the information becomes public record...IIRC.Jason K wrote:I voted for Patterson. I was disappointed that he didn't win, but now I'm glad he didn't.
I wonder if Patterson's "leak" might open him up to some sort of HIPPA violation.....
Was he Patrick's doctor?Jason K wrote:I wonder if Patterson's "leak" might open him up to some sort of HIPPA violation.....
I wonder what Patrick did to earn that kind of ire from Patterson?Jumping Frog wrote:TexasCajun wrote:... But this latest stunt taints all of that hard work.
Just curious. How did Patrick's medical records get entered into a court proceeding?Dragonfighter wrote:Once the information becomes part of a court record and barring it being "sealed" by court order, the information becomes public record...IIRC.Jason K wrote:I voted for Patterson. I was disappointed that he didn't win, but now I'm glad he didn't.
I wonder if Patterson's "leak" might open him up to some sort of HIPPA violation.....
Same here.Jason K wrote:I voted for Patterson. I was disappointed that he didn't win, but now I'm glad he didn't.
It's all pretty ugly right now... hard to know what to believe...TexasGal wrote:I saw a new interview with Patterson where he spewed out the whole suicide thing like it happened yesterday and then he blurted out that Patrick has a CHL. Thanks! Nothing like putting it into the public mind that an isolated depresson many years ago means someone will do some violent thing today with a gun. I voted for Patterson. I didn't like the way Patrick came across in the debate I saw. But now, I have seen better behavior from him than Dewhurst and Patrick. Frankly, I don't believe the long ago depressive incident, name change, or the money stuff they are carrying on about is nearly as bad as their behavior now.
I will be doing the same.tomneal wrote:The Neal's did early voting today.
This week, I listened to both Dan Patrick and David Dewhurst on AM950 in Houston.
Patrick's message was about things he wanted to achieve for Texas.
Dewhurst's message was that neither he nor his campaign said untrue/bad things about Dan Patrick.
I appreciate what David Dewhurst has done for our side while he has been Lt. Governor but looking forward, I believe Dan Patrick will be better for Texans.
I voted for Dan Patrick.
A good friend of mine and I arrived at this conclusion for the same reason.RoyGBiv wrote:It's all pretty ugly right now... hard to know what to believe...TexasGal wrote:I saw a new interview with Patterson where he spewed out the whole suicide thing like it happened yesterday and then he blurted out that Patrick has a CHL. Thanks! Nothing like putting it into the public mind that an isolated depresson many years ago means someone will do some violent thing today with a gun. I voted for Patterson. I didn't like the way Patrick came across in the debate I saw. But now, I have seen better behavior from him than Dewhurst and Patrick. Frankly, I don't believe the long ago depressive incident, name change, or the money stuff they are carrying on about is nearly as bad as their behavior now.
At the moment, the decision maker for me is this...
In my gut, I don't like Patrick. I don't trust that Dan Patrick is running for me and not himself.
I have almost nothing to back that up factually, it really comes down to reading between the lines and reading into the way he's presented himself.
As much as I don't have any joy for Dewhurst, I'm hopeful that Pattersons support of him has some merit and I fall back on the fact that he's announced this will be his last term. Maybe we'll see 2 better choices in 4 years instead of one better choice running against Patrick as an incumbent.
I haven't voted yet, so, ...feel free to tell me where I'm wrong.