Malaysia Airlines Flight Vanishes

Topics that do not fit anywhere else. Absolutely NO discussions of religion, race, or immigration!

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

suthdj
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 2296
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 8:49 pm
Location: North Ft Worth(Alliance area)

Re: Malaysia Airlines Flight Vanishes

#121

Post by suthdj »

WildBill wrote:
mojo84 wrote:Maybe they did and that is why they are staying quiet. I still wonder if the plane was shot down and the country that did it doesn't want to admit it.
That is a very plausible explanation.
If one of them shot it down I think the other 2 would be pointing fingers
21-Apr-09 filed online
05-Sep-09 Plastic Arrived
09-Sep-13 Plastic Arrived
21-june-18 Plasic Arrived
User avatar

mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 14
Posts: 9043
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: Malaysia Airlines Flight Vanishes

#122

Post by mojo84 »

suthdj wrote:
WildBill wrote:
mojo84 wrote:Maybe they did and that is why they are staying quiet. I still wonder if the plane was shot down and the country that did it doesn't want to admit it.
That is a very plausible explanation.
If one of them shot it down I think the other 2 would be pointing fingers
I hear ya but who would have thought a plane could just disappear in this day and time.
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.
User avatar

strider67
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 12
Posts: 587
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 12:18 am
Location: Weatherford, Tx

Re: Malaysia Airlines Flight Vanishes

#123

Post by strider67 »

mojo84 wrote:
suthdj wrote:
WildBill wrote:
mojo84 wrote:Maybe they did and that is why they are staying quiet. I still wonder if the plane was shot down and the country that did it doesn't want to admit it.
That is a very plausible explanation.
If one of them shot it down I think the other 2 would be pointing fingers
I hear ya but who would have thought a plane could just disappear in this day and time.
I may not have my facts straight, but if it were shot down, when would it have been shot down? The engines were still shaking hands with the radar 7.5 hours after disappearing, no?

The news stated this morning that China is getting quite upset with how the investigation is progressing. There were obviously a large number of Chinese people on board...
"When things look bad and it looks like you're not gonna make it, then you gotta get mean. I mean plum, mad-dog mean. Cuz' if you lose your head and you give up then you neither live nor win...that's just the way it is." - The Outlaw Josey Wales
User avatar

Topic author
WildBill
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 20
Posts: 17350
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Malaysia Airlines Flight Vanishes

#124

Post by WildBill »

strider67 wrote:
mojo84 wrote:
suthdj wrote:
WildBill wrote:
mojo84 wrote:Maybe they did and that is why they are staying quiet. I still wonder if the plane was shot down and the country that did it doesn't want to admit it.
That is a very plausible explanation.
If one of them shot it down I think the other 2 would be pointing fingers
I hear ya but who would have thought a plane could just disappear in this day and time.
I may not have my facts straight, but if it were shot down, when would it have been shot down? The engines were still shaking hands with the radar 7.5 hours after disappearing, no?

The news stated this morning that China is getting quite upset with how the investigation is progressing. There were obviously a large number of Chinese people on board...
Maybe their statements are typical government speak PR. I would think that the Chinese are also performing their own investigation.

I can't explain how the engines were still shaking hands with the radar 7.5 hours after disappearing. It seems like the airlines and military communications experts could explain it better than me or the news reporters.

You might think that if the airliner was scheduled to land in China at a certain time and it didn't show up they would have started a search and investigation/inquiry right away.
NRA Endowment Member
User avatar

puma guy
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 7786
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:23 pm
Location: Near San Jacinto

Re: Malaysia Airlines Flight Vanishes

#125

Post by puma guy »

Has any one checked with David Copperfield? :lol:
KAHR PM40/Hoffner IWB and S&W Mod 60/ Galco IWB
NRA Endowment Member, TSRA Life Member,100 Club Life Member,TFC Member
My Faith, My Gun and My Constitution: I cling to all three!
User avatar

Jaguar
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 1332
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 5:24 pm
Location: Just west of Cool, Texas

Re: Malaysia Airlines Flight Vanishes

#126

Post by Jaguar »

A former airline pilot, friend, and coworker of mine put out theory this morning I hadn’t heard in any of the news stories I’ve seen or read.

The plane is said to have climbed to 45,000 feet, which is above the recommended operating altitude of the Boing 777. The pilot could have decreased cabin pressure and at that altitude the drop down oxygen masks for passengers would last about 30 minutes. The walk-around bottles for the cabin crew would last about 45 minutes. The flight deck has enough oxygen to last beyond the rest of the plane and would probably last 2-3 hours. If the pilot wanted to take over the plane he could climb to 45,000, dump the pressure and wait an hour for everyone on board except himself and the co-pilot to die. If the co-pilot was not with the pilot it would be simple enough to incapacitate him prior to execution of the plan. Even if the cabin crew and passengers wanted to stop the pilot, the doors are hardened and they only have the walk around oxygen bottles for the cabin crew so large scale resistance would be futile.

From what I have heard, the pilot was a supporter of an opposition leader who was jailed hours before the flight. His wife and kids left him the day before the flight. He was an experienced pilot who could land a 777 singlehandedly. Maybe the plane is sitting on the ground somewhere being repurposed with everyone on board dead. Maybe the pilot set the autopilot to fly to the middle of the Indian Ocean and took off his oxygen mask in a suicide hijacking. The suicide pilot sounds the most plausible to me. If it were a hijacking by someone other than the pilot/co-pilot the same method could be used kill everyone on board, but that seems less plausible.
"I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." -- James Madison
User avatar

RoyGBiv
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 24
Posts: 9551
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:41 am
Location: Fort Worth

Re: Malaysia Airlines Flight Vanishes

#127

Post by RoyGBiv »

Here's the first "hijacked" theory that has any resonance with me at all.

Facts re: SIA-68 not confirmed.
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I am not a lawyer. This is NOT legal advice.!
Nothing tempers idealism quite like the cold bath of reality.... SQLGeek
User avatar

jmra
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 33
Posts: 10371
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:51 am
Location: Ellis County

Re: Malaysia Airlines Flight Vanishes

#128

Post by jmra »

RoyGBiv wrote:Here's the first "hijacked" theory that has any resonance with me at all.

Facts re: SIA-68 not confirmed.
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
:iagree: Makes a lot of sense.
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member
User avatar

RoyGBiv
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 24
Posts: 9551
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:41 am
Location: Fort Worth

Re: Malaysia Airlines Flight Vanishes

#129

Post by RoyGBiv »

jmra wrote:
RoyGBiv wrote:Here's the first "hijacked" theory that has any resonance with me at all.

Facts re: SIA-68 not confirmed.
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
:iagree: Makes a lot of sense.
Apparently this is a difficult thing to both "schedule" and to "execute".
How do you know where the other plane will be and exactly when?
How to you "catch up" to it in time to hide behind it when the timing needs to be just so and the difference between cruise speed and max speed isn't that great? (555Kts vs 590Kts).

I still believe it's likely not terrorism.
Either a cascading failure of equipment or possibly the pilot lost his mind.
I am not a lawyer. This is NOT legal advice.!
Nothing tempers idealism quite like the cold bath of reality.... SQLGeek
User avatar

SewTexas
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 3509
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 11:52 pm
Location: Alvin
Contact:

Re: Malaysia Airlines Flight Vanishes

#130

Post by SewTexas »

jmra wrote:
RoyGBiv wrote:Here's the first "hijacked" theory that has any resonance with me at all.

Facts re: SIA-68 not confirmed.
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
:iagree: Makes a lot of sense.

wow....if they did this, can you imagine the planning?
~Tracy
Gun control is what you talk about when you don't want to talk about the truth ~ Colion Noir
User avatar

jmra
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 33
Posts: 10371
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:51 am
Location: Ellis County

Re: Malaysia Airlines Flight Vanishes

#131

Post by jmra »

SewTexas wrote:
jmra wrote:
RoyGBiv wrote:Here's the first "hijacked" theory that has any resonance with me at all.

Facts re: SIA-68 not confirmed.
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
:iagree: Makes a lot of sense.

wow....if they did this, can you imagine the planning?
Terrorist spent over 2 years planning 9/11. Commitment and planning don't seem to be an issue. Before 9/11 no one who has believed it possible that 3 out of 4 hijacked planes could hit major targets in the US.

I'm not saying this is what happened, just that it is plausible.
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member
User avatar

RoyGBiv
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 24
Posts: 9551
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:41 am
Location: Fort Worth

Re: Malaysia Airlines Flight Vanishes

#132

Post by RoyGBiv »

I'm still placing my bets on some version of "mechanical/electrical/airframe failure/fire"

Here's another good hypothesis. Occam would be proud.
http://www.wired.com/autopia/2014/03/mh ... ical-fire/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The left turn is the key here. Zaharie Ahmad Shaw was a very experienced senior captain with 18,000 hours of flight time. We old pilots were drilled to know what is the closest airport of safe harbor while in cruise. Airports behind us, airports abeam us, and airports ahead of us. They’re always in our head. Always. If something happens, you don’t want to be thinking about what are you going to do–you already know what you are going to do. When I saw that left turn with a direct heading, I instinctively knew he was heading for an airport. He was taking a direct route to Palau Langkawi, a 13,000-foot airstrip with an approach over water and no obstacles. The captain did not turn back to Kuala Lampur because he knew he had 8,000-foot ridges to cross. He knew the terrain was friendlier toward Langkawi, which also was closer.

Take a look at this airport on Google Earth. The pilot did all the right things. He was confronted by some major event onboard that made him make an immediate turn to the closest, safest airport.

For me, the loss of transponders and communications makes perfect sense in a fire. And there most likely was an electrical fire. In the case of a fire, the first response is to pull the main busses and restore circuits one by one until you have isolated the bad one. If they pulled the busses, the plane would go silent. It probably was a serious event and the flight crew was occupied with controlling the plane and trying to fight the fire. Aviate, navigate, and lastly, communicate is the mantra in such situations.
I am not a lawyer. This is NOT legal advice.!
Nothing tempers idealism quite like the cold bath of reality.... SQLGeek
User avatar

Beiruty
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 21
Posts: 9655
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 9:22 pm
Location: Allen, Texas

Re: Malaysia Airlines Flight Vanishes

#133

Post by Beiruty »

So how it was pinging for 7hrs?
Beiruty,
United we stand, dispersed we falter
2014: NRA Endowment lifetime member
User avatar

jmra
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 33
Posts: 10371
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:51 am
Location: Ellis County

Re: Malaysia Airlines Flight Vanishes

#134

Post by jmra »

RoyGBiv wrote:I'm still placing my bets on some version of "mechanical/electrical/airframe failure/fire"

Here's another good hypothesis. Occam would be proud.
http://www.wired.com/autopia/2014/03/mh ... ical-fire/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The left turn is the key here. Zaharie Ahmad Shaw was a very experienced senior captain with 18,000 hours of flight time. We old pilots were drilled to know what is the closest airport of safe harbor while in cruise. Airports behind us, airports abeam us, and airports ahead of us. They’re always in our head. Always. If something happens, you don’t want to be thinking about what are you going to do–you already know what you are going to do. When I saw that left turn with a direct heading, I instinctively knew he was heading for an airport. He was taking a direct route to Palau Langkawi, a 13,000-foot airstrip with an approach over water and no obstacles. The captain did not turn back to Kuala Lampur because he knew he had 8,000-foot ridges to cross. He knew the terrain was friendlier toward Langkawi, which also was closer.

Take a look at this airport on Google Earth. The pilot did all the right things. He was confronted by some major event onboard that made him make an immediate turn to the closest, safest airport.

For me, the loss of transponders and communications makes perfect sense in a fire. And there most likely was an electrical fire. In the case of a fire, the first response is to pull the main busses and restore circuits one by one until you have isolated the bad one. If they pulled the busses, the plane would go silent. It probably was a serious event and the flight crew was occupied with controlling the plane and trying to fight the fire. Aviate, navigate, and lastly, communicate is the mantra in such situations.
According to Fox News this morning, data received from the plane's systems show that the turn was preprogrammed into the navigation system and was not performed manually. It may have even been programmed into the system while it was still on the ground.
Another link http://news.iafrica.com/worldnews/908028.html
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member

philip964
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 74
Posts: 18226
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:30 pm

Re: Malaysia Airlines Flight Vanishes

#135

Post by philip964 »

The pilot had four landing sites in the Indian Ocean, programmed into his hobby flight simulator.

Doesn't mean a thing, but interesting.
Post Reply

Return to “Off-Topic”