Rand Paul bill to remove post office gun ban

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 9044
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: Rand Paul bill to remove post office gun ban

#31

Post by mojo84 »

A Google search turned this up. Judge rule parking lot OK.
http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/11/us/guns-post-office/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


Here's a link to a PDF discussing it. The 30 days is what could prove very costly.

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=w ... tiZxLu6osQ" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.

chasfm11
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 4161
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:01 pm
Location: Northern DFW

Re: Rand Paul bill to remove post office gun ban

#32

Post by chasfm11 »

mojo84 wrote:A Google search turned this up. Judge rule parking lot OK.
http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/11/us/guns-post-office/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


Here's a link to a PDF discussing it. The 30 days is what could prove very costly.

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=w ... tiZxLu6osQ" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
:iagree: And I have little hope that a jail sentence would not apply to me if I were convicted, given the current atmosphere in the US DOJ.
Like NY and NJ, they seem to delight in "making examples" of anyone who crosses their political boundaries.
6/23-8/13/10 -51 days to plastic
Dum Spiro, Spero
User avatar

sjfcontrol
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Flint, TX

Re: Rand Paul bill to remove post office gun ban

#33

Post by sjfcontrol »

39 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) Part §232 & §232.1 - Conduct on Postal Property

http://cfr.vlex.com/vid/232-1-conduct-p ... y-19777182" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
(l) Weapons and explosives. No person while on postal property may carry firearms, other dangerous or deadly weapons, or explosives, either openly or concealed, or store the same on postal property, except for official purposes.

<snip>

(2) Whoever shall be found guilty of violating the rules and regulations in this section while on property under the charge and control of the Postal Service is subject to fine of not more than $50 or imprisonment of not more than 30 days, or both. Nothing contained in these rules and regulations shall be construed to abrogate any other Federal laws or regulations of any State and local laws and regulations applicable to any area in which the property is situated.
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget. Image
User avatar

Jumping Frog
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 5488
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:13 am
Location: Klein, TX (Houston NW suburb)

Re: Rand Paul bill to remove post office gun ban

#34

Post by Jumping Frog »

sjfcontrol wrote:39 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) Part §232 & §232.1 - Conduct on Postal Property
Thanks for saving me the effort. :thumbs2:
-Just call me Bob . . . Texas Firearms Coalition, NRA Life member, TSRA Life member, and OFCC Patron member

This froggie ain't boiling! Shall not be infringed! Μολών Λαβέ

cprems
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 231
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2013 2:07 am

Re: Rand Paul bill to remove post office gun ban

#35

Post by cprems »

The bill was shot down in the Democratic committee.

NAGR is reporting.
04/01/2013 - Online application
06/22/2013 - Plastic in hand
75 days - mailbox to mailbox
03/17 - renewal - 42 days plastic in hand
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”