Glock 42 specs leaked

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

User avatar

cheezit
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1158
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 9:10 pm
Location: far n fortworh

Re: Glock 42 specs leaked

#16

Post by cheezit »

glock has made a .380 for years, just not legale to import. I was wondering how they got past the regs.
I just dont see the point.

rev210
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 238
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2011 7:48 pm
Location: San Antonio

Re: Glock 42 specs leaked

#17

Post by rev210 »

Like others I was hoping it would be a single stack 9mm, some of the comments on the linked site say that the Glock 41 will be a single stack 9mm, hopefully that is the case and it comes out soon as well.

mrvmax
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2023
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 7:16 pm
Location: Friendswood

Re: Glock 42 specs leaked

#18

Post by mrvmax »

They are years late getting in on the 380 game with a 380 that can be bought by the general public.
User avatar

Jumping Frog
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 5488
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:13 am
Location: Klein, TX (Houston NW suburb)

Re: Glock 42 specs leaked

#19

Post by Jumping Frog »

mrvmax wrote:They are years late getting in on the 380 game with a 380 that can be bought by the general public.
They are late, I agree. They were unable to import their .380's, which is why they must have started manufacturing these in the US.
-Just call me Bob . . . Texas Firearms Coalition, NRA Life member, TSRA Life member, and OFCC Patron member

This froggie ain't boiling! Shall not be infringed! Μολών Λαβέ

rentz
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 788
Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 9:16 am
Location: DFW

Re: Glock 42 specs leaked

#20

Post by rentz »

Not really getting adding another .380 to the US market when 9mm seem's to be taking over the small compact area with smaller single stack 9s

remington79
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 357
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 6:38 pm
Location: a little bit of everywhere

Re: Glock 42 specs leaked

#21

Post by remington79 »

Glock has started making pistols in Georgia. Those say made in the USA and the serial numbers start with AA. A couple started coming out during one of the last panics. The US made ones are starting to become more common.
Sent to you from Galt's Gulch.
User avatar

jmra
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 10371
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:51 am
Location: Ellis County

Re: Glock 42 specs leaked

#22

Post by jmra »

Glock 42 is already for sale on gunbroker.com.
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member
User avatar

jmra
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 10371
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:51 am
Location: Ellis County

Re: Glock 42 specs leaked

#23

Post by jmra »

I think I'll buy one of these as soon as it hits the shelves to use while my XDs is at Springfield for its "upgrade". :smilelol5:
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member
User avatar

03Lightningrocks
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 11453
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Plano

Re: Glock 42 specs leaked

#24

Post by 03Lightningrocks »

I don't think I am going to be buying into this one. I am not that impressed with the ballistics and there are 9mm guns on the market that are smaller and easier to carry. About the only reason I bought my Kahr P380 was to have a small pocket pistol. It sits in my safe most of the time.
User avatar

dubya
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 296
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 2:32 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Glock 42 specs leaked

#25

Post by dubya »

A .380 Glock? Not for me. Perhaps something that holds 11 of these... ;-)
Image
JW, Sons of the Republic of Texas
NRA, TSRA
User avatar

gigag04
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5474
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 7:47 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Glock 42 specs leaked

#26

Post by gigag04 »

I like Glock but it's too little, and too late to the party when the CW9 destroys it from every talking point.
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work. - Thomas Edison

texanjoker

Re: Glock 42 specs leaked

#27

Post by texanjoker »

Dirthawking wrote:So it would seem the specs on the Glock 42 were leaked early.

Glock 42, 6+1 .380 ACP, pocket gun, MSRP $475

Thoughts?

GT's has them for $329 as of 01/20 or $399 for people not eligible for the glock special pricing... come tax time I'll be picking one up :thumbs2:
User avatar

68Charger
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 717
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 9:00 pm
Location: San Antonio, Texas

Re: Glock 42 specs leaked

#28

Post by 68Charger »

That thing looks a bit bulky. This thing looks like it can hold more than 6 rounds. I'm a bit disappointed.

I just wanna play w one now. Dang you CHL forums.. :grumble

Took a better look at the photos. It's very compact. Still disappointed it doesn't hold more :/
We don't need no stinking badges!
User avatar

03Lightningrocks
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 11453
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Plano

Re: Glock 42 specs leaked

#29

Post by 03Lightningrocks »

68Charger wrote:That thing looks a bit bulky. This thing looks like it can hold more than 6 rounds. I'm a bit disappointed.

I just wanna play w one now. Dang you CHL forums.. :grumble

Took a better look at the photos. It's very compact. Still disappointed it doesn't hold more :/
Your post caused me to look at a comparison next to the PM9. It is about the same width, which can mean as much as anything for concealed carry. It is about a half inch longer and a quarter inch taller than the PM9. I get the same amount of rounds but get a round with better ballistic performance in the PM9. It is quiet a bit larger than the other .380's made for concealed/pocket carry.
User avatar

jmra
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 10371
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:51 am
Location: Ellis County

Re: Glock 42 specs leaked

#30

Post by jmra »

03Lightningrocks wrote:
68Charger wrote:That thing looks a bit bulky. This thing looks like it can hold more than 6 rounds. I'm a bit disappointed.

I just wanna play w one now. Dang you CHL forums.. :grumble

Took a better look at the photos. It's very compact. Still disappointed it doesn't hold more :/
Your post caused me to look at a comparison next to the PM9. It is about the same width, which can mean as much as anything for concealed carry. It is about a half inch longer and a quarter inch taller than the PM9. I get the same amount of rounds but get a round with better ballistic performance in the PM9. It is quiet a bit larger than the other .380's made for concealed/pocket carry.
If Glock ever comes out with this same gun in a 9mm I will have one.
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”