cb1000rider wrote:Would you accept it without fact if he had said "Financial collapse is a mathematical certainty if we don't change from our current course... " ?
That's how I read his statement. I think it's fairly well established that you can't spend more than you take in without financial consequence indefinitely...
We either spend less, pay more, do both, or pass it off to the kids. Some combination of those options. Elect someone who says that they'll increase your taxes and decrease your benefits....
And indeed, that is what I meant. I used to think I was fairly knowledgeable about economics but the last decade has turned what I thought I knew on it's head, and I've been reading whoever puts forth a cogent theory and trying to get a grasp on what's happening. The general options you mentioned are certainly true.....spend less, pay more, do both, or foist it off on someone else....though I think the actual machinations in the financial system are more nefarious than these simple alternatives would lead most people to believe. Via debt and credit there has been a systematic transfer of wealth from the middle class ever since the Fed was created.