I am kinda of two minds on this one...I like the concept but I see it as more infringement on states rights...what say y'all?On August 1, 2013, U.S. Reps. Rich Nugent (R-Fla.) and Jim Matheson (D- Utah), introduced H.R. 2959, The National Right to Carry Reciprocity Act. This NRA-backed legislation would allow any person with a valid concealed carry permit to carry a concealed firearm in any other state that issues concealed firearm permits or does not prohibit the carrying of concealed firearms. A state's laws governing where concealed firearms may be carried would still apply to all within its borders. Similar legislation to H.R. 2959 passed the U.S. House of Representatives in the 112th Congress by an overwhelming bipartisan vote of 272-154.
H.R. 2959
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 1513
- Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 12:55 pm
- Location: Smith County
- Contact:
H.R. 2959
From http://www.nraila.org/legislation/feder ... undup.aspx
A man will fight harder for his interests than for his rights.
- Napoleon Bonaparte
PFC Paul E. Ison USMC 1916-2001
- Napoleon Bonaparte
PFC Paul E. Ison USMC 1916-2001
-
- Banned
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 1374
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 1:58 pm
Re: H.R. 2959
Bad bill, and I have no idea why the NRA is involved in it.
- the unintended consequence of this bill would be any states that are may issue, or that have CHL programs that are expensive or difficult will quickly become "no issue." I can't picture a state like Maryland keeping any form of permits if they all of the sudden have to honor permits from their much more gun friendly neighbor, Virginia. You would see this repeated throughout the country.
- don't need the Feds eroding states rights any further.
Next donation to the NRAILA will include a note asking them to use their resources a little better.
- the unintended consequence of this bill would be any states that are may issue, or that have CHL programs that are expensive or difficult will quickly become "no issue." I can't picture a state like Maryland keeping any form of permits if they all of the sudden have to honor permits from their much more gun friendly neighbor, Virginia. You would see this repeated throughout the country.
- don't need the Feds eroding states rights any further.
Next donation to the NRAILA will include a note asking them to use their resources a little better.
The Time is Now...
NRA Lifetime Member
NRA Lifetime Member
Re: H.R. 2959
I'm for a national bill. It took one for LEO's to be able to carry in all 50 states. Otherwise many states prohibited carry. If it is ran similar to a driver's license it makes sense. I can see a minimum standard being set which could be good or bad, depending on the state.
Re: H.R. 2959
I too am concerned with getting the Feds involved in coordinating concealed carry among states. First they will set some minimum guidelines then what. Possibly the current state reciprocy has problems, but I don't think getting the Feds involved will fix anything in the long run.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 470
- Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2013 7:00 am
Re: H.R. 2959
Yeah look at how good they're running the country, I'd say they've done more than enough....
"Our houses are protected by the Good Lord and a gun, you might em both if you show up here not welcome son" Josh Thompson- Way out here (best song ever) "eventually all citizens will become criminals with enough legislation....."
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 2985
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 9:39 pm
- Location: Western Texas
Re: H.R. 2959
First off, this bill will never get signed into law by the current administration so I don't see why we would waste time on pushing it too hard.
Secondly, States rights, this bill more than likely would pass muster under the full faith and credit clause so no issue there.
Thirdly, I don't see minimum standards in this bill but maybe we need to get them inserted in to it or added on later. Minimum standards should consist of two items: all states will be shall issue and one must be legal to own in order to carry. beyond that any other minimum standard should be fought against tooth and nail.
Secondly, States rights, this bill more than likely would pass muster under the full faith and credit clause so no issue there.
Thirdly, I don't see minimum standards in this bill but maybe we need to get them inserted in to it or added on later. Minimum standards should consist of two items: all states will be shall issue and one must be legal to own in order to carry. beyond that any other minimum standard should be fought against tooth and nail.
How do you explain a dog named Sauer without first telling the story of a Puppy named Sig?
R.I.P. Sig, 08/21/2019 - 11/18/2019
R.I.P. Sig, 08/21/2019 - 11/18/2019
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 462
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 9:22 am
- Location: Central Texas
Re: H.R. 2959
The federal government should not create more firearm-related laws, they should declare the state restrictions unconstitutional.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 3166
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:39 am
- Location: Bay Area, CA
Re: H.R. 2959
Didn't the SCOTUS rule that no-issue was a no-go recently? Or did that just apply to Illinois?steveincowtown wrote:Bad bill, and I have no idea why the NRA is involved in it.
- the unintended consequence of this bill would be any states that are may issue, or that have CHL programs that are expensive or difficult will quickly become "no issue." I can't picture a state like Maryland keeping any form of permits if they all of the sudden have to honor permits from their much more gun friendly neighbor, Virginia. You would see this repeated throughout the country.
- don't need the Feds eroding states rights any further.
Next donation to the NRAILA will include a note asking them to use their resources a little better.
I am not a lawyer, nor have I played one on TV, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, nor should anything I say be taken as legal advice. If it is important that any information be accurate, do not use me as the only source.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 1701
- Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 1:37 am
- Location: Fort Worth, TX
Re: H.R. 2959
Comparing this law to the driver's license reciprocity between states is an apples to oranges problem. The Federal Government and the rabidly liberal haters have no problem with most American's owning and driving cars. There is no motivation for that law to be used nefariously. Same with the law allowing LEO's to carry. Liberals don't perceive armed LEO's the same way as armed citizens. If this law can be used in any way to subvert our freedoms, it will be.
The Only Bodyguard I Can Afford is Me
Texas LTC Instructor Cert
NRA Life Member
Texas LTC Instructor Cert
NRA Life Member
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 1919
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 11:42 pm
- Location: NE TX
Re: H.R. 2959
Just look at the Liberal gun laws in DC.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 2315
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 2:02 pm
- Contact:
Re: H.R. 2959
Ronald Reagan said the most fearful eight words in the English language is, "I'm from the government, I'm here to help."
I Thess 5:21
Disclaimer: IANAL, IANYL, IDNPOOTV, IDNSIAHIE and IANROFL
"There is no situation so bad that you can't make it worse." - Chris Hadfield, NASA ISS Astronaut
Disclaimer: IANAL, IANYL, IDNPOOTV, IDNSIAHIE and IANROFL
"There is no situation so bad that you can't make it worse." - Chris Hadfield, NASA ISS Astronaut