RogueUSMC wrote:It's HU that is on first...
![rlol "rlol"](./images/smilies/rlol.gif)
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
RogueUSMC wrote:It's HU that is on first...
gringo pistolero wrote:Was HU a flight attendant? viewtopic.php?f=83&t=67639" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;03Lightningrocks wrote:RogueUSMC wrote: It's HU that is on first...![]()
In before da lock.RogueUSMC wrote:you suppose ta be repose...lak disgringo pistolero wrote:Was HU a flight attendant? viewtopic.php?f=83&t=67639" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;03Lightningrocks wrote:RogueUSMC wrote: It's HU that is on first...![]()
Me too.03Lightningrocks wrote:In before da lock.RogueUSMC wrote:you suppose ta be repose...lak disgringo pistolero wrote:Was HU a flight attendant? viewtopic.php?f=83&t=67639" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;03Lightningrocks wrote:RogueUSMC wrote: It's HU that is on first...![]()
Rinse and repeat.Abraham wrote:Thanks to you all for proving my point.
You've done a Mah-Vell-Us job.
You forgot "lather"...The Annoyed Man wrote:Rinse and repeat.Abraham wrote:Thanks to you all for proving my point.
You've done a Mah-Vell-Us job.
Yep, he sure did. Lather... Then rinse and repeat.sjfcontrol wrote:You forgot "lather"...The Annoyed Man wrote:Rinse and repeat.Abraham wrote:Thanks to you all for proving my point.
You've done a Mah-Vell-Us job.
It's free and easy.Abraham wrote:I can at times understand the re-posting of an original post with an accompanying response, but most of the time re-posting the original isn't necessary.
If a question is asked, why isn't a simple answer adequate? Most especially if the response is immediately responded to after the question.
I also see multiple re-posts ad nauseam in a single response.
Why do this?
WildBill wrote:It's free and easy.Abraham wrote:I can at times understand the re-posting of an original post with an accompanying response, but most of the time re-posting the original isn't necessary.
If a question is asked, why isn't a simple answer adequate? Most especially if the response is immediately responded to after the question.
I also see multiple re-posts ad nauseam in a single response.
Why do this?
You have me thinking. Maybe a carbon tax on re-posting. First we would have to prove it is contributing to global warming, but it is pretty easy to blame almost anything for that these days.sunny beach wrote:WildBill wrote:It's free and easy.Abraham wrote:I can at times understand the re-posting of an original post with an accompanying response, but most of the time re-posting the original isn't necessary.
If a question is asked, why isn't a simple answer adequate? Most especially if the response is immediately responded to after the question.
I also see multiple re-posts ad nauseam in a single response.
Why do this?![]()
I use only recycled electrons so it's environmentally friendly.
Al, is that you?03Lightningrocks wrote:You have me thinking. Maybe a carbon tax on re-posting. First we would have to prove it is contributing to global warming, but it is pretty easy to blame almost anything for that these days.sunny beach wrote:WildBill wrote:It's free and easy.Abraham wrote:I can at times understand the re-posting of an original post with an accompanying response, but most of the time re-posting the original isn't necessary.
If a question is asked, why isn't a simple answer adequate? Most especially if the response is immediately responded to after the question.
I also see multiple re-posts ad nauseam in a single response.
Why do this?![]()
I use only recycled electrons so it's environmentally friendly.
Abraham -Abraham wrote:I can at times understand the re-posting of an original post with an accompanying response, but most of the time re-posting the original isn't necessary.
If a question is asked, why isn't a simple answer adequate? Most especially if the response is immediately responded to after the question.
I also see multiple re-posts ad nauseam in a single response.
Why do this?
Very few times do I see such re-posting help clarify, if anything, re-posting wily nily seems to muddy things up.
Rant off.