Rights lost I don't understand this

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Post Reply

Topic author
tommyg
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 875
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2011 9:59 am
Location: Dale, TX

Rights lost I don't understand this

#1

Post by tommyg »

I don't understand this but it does not look good
...
N.R.A. benefactor Member :tiphat: Please Support the N.R.A. :patriot:
User avatar

Wes
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 885
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 6:02 pm
Location: Ft Worth
Contact:

Re: Rights lost I don't understand this

#2

Post by Wes »

You can read some previous discussion on it here

viewtopic.php?f=82&t=23154&p=833576&#p833576" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Alliance Arsenal - Firearms and transfers in north Ft. Worth
User avatar

Wes
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 885
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 6:02 pm
Location: Ft Worth
Contact:

Re: Rights lost I don't understand this

#3

Post by Wes »

And here

viewtopic.php?f=83&t=67082&p=823963&#p823963" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Alliance Arsenal - Firearms and transfers in north Ft. Worth
User avatar

Jumping Frog
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5488
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:13 am
Location: Klein, TX (Houston NW suburb)

Re: Rights lost I don't understand this

#4

Post by Jumping Frog »

You know, it would help if at least one person would be thoughtful enough to give even a single sentence on what the heck the topic is instead of just posting inscrutable links.
-Just call me Bob . . . Texas Firearms Coalition, NRA Life member, TSRA Life member, and OFCC Patron member

This froggie ain't boiling! Shall not be infringed! Μολών Λαβέ
User avatar

Beiruty
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 9655
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 9:22 pm
Location: Allen, Texas

Re: Rights lost I don't understand this

#5

Post by Beiruty »

So let us see, if someone was shot badly and could not speak, then he kept silent when questioned. Assuming he has no right to be silent, how he force him to talk, or how his silence is considered an implicit admission of guilt? How such "evidence" can be used in court of law? Jurors all have the minimum intelligence to know the 5th A. If not, we are in real trouble.
Beiruty,
United we stand, dispersed we falter
2014: NRA Endowment lifetime member

chasfm11
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 4161
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:01 pm
Location: Northern DFW

Re: Rights lost I don't understand this

#6

Post by chasfm11 »

Beiruty wrote:So let us see, if someone was shot badly and could not speak, then he kept silent when questioned. Assuming he has no right to be silent, how he force him to talk, or how his silence is considered an implicit admission of guilt? How such "evidence" can be used in court of law? Jurors all have the minimum intelligence to know the 5th A. If not, we are in real trouble.
We're in real trouble. I'm not sure all of the jurors understand that there is a Constitution. The war that the Elites have waged on the Constitution has left many people believing that it is an arcane document that no longer has any power. They are pretty close to being right in a lot of cases.
6/23-8/13/10 -51 days to plastic
Dum Spiro, Spero

MeMelYup
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1874
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 3:21 pm

Re: Rights lost I don't understand this

#7

Post by MeMelYup »

I think it means you have to invoke your right to not self incriminate because your body language can and will incriminate you. A persons body speaks for itself without you saying a word.
User avatar

hillfighter
Banned
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 356
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 3:56 pm
Location: Hill Country

Re: Rights lost I don't understand this

#8

Post by hillfighter »

If you assert your right against self incrimination, and then make an oral statement, I don't think investigators are obligated to ignore that. I don't think non-verbal communication should be treated much differently by investigators, although there are definitely differences when it comes to evidence in a court of law and a jury's interpretation.




"Describe what Marsellus Wallace looks like."

:mrgreen:
"support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic"

PArrow
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:04 am

Re: Rights lost I don't understand this

#9

Post by PArrow »

Good time to bring up something all of us should know.

The Police are not there to help you, they are there to collect evidence. NOTHING in the Miranda Right is for you "Anything you say may be used against you", doesn't say a thing about helping you.

Even as a wittiness you have to be careful. If you were involved in a criminal investigation you should consult with a lawyer before you answer any questions.
"A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives a moderate exercise to the Body, it gives boldness, enterprise, and independence to the mind . . . Let your gun therefore be the constant companion of your walks."
--Thomas Jefferson
User avatar

Jaguar
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1332
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 5:24 pm
Location: Just west of Cool, Texas

Re: Rights lost I don't understand this

#10

Post by Jaguar »

In a nutshell,
Then the cops asked whether the gun would match the shells from the scene of the murder. According to the police, Salinas stopped talking, shuffled his feet, bit his lip, and started to tighten up.

At trial, Salinas did not testify, but prosecutors described his reportedly uncomfortable reaction to the question about his shotgun. Salinas argued this violated his Fifth Amendment rights: He had remained silent, and the Supreme Court had previously made clear that prosecutors can’t bring up a defendant’s refusal to answer the state’s questions. This time around, however, Justice Samuel Alito blithely responded that Salinas was “free to leave” and did not assert his right to remain silent. He was silent. But somehow, without a lawyer, and without being told his rights, he should have affirmatively “invoked” his right to not answer questions.
and,
Writing for the dissent, Justice Breyer asked, “How can an individual who is not a lawyer know that these particular words [“I expressly invoke the privilege against self incrimination”] are legally magic?”
I guess I need to practice replacing the phrase "I don't talk to police" with “I expressly invoke the privilege against self incrimination
"I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." -- James Madison

JP171
Banned
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1406
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 5:47 am
Location: San Leon Texas

Re: Rights lost I don't understand this

#11

Post by JP171 »

I am curious, has Justice Alito ever tried to walk out of a police station while being questioned? no? didn't think so, the defendant was never free to go Miranda or not as texas does not require Miranda to be read while being detained.
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”