ATF tries to block whistleblowing agent’s Fast and Furious b

[The Annoyed Man]

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 ... t-and-fur/
ATF tries to block whistleblowing agent’s Fast and Furious book
1st Amendment battle over ‘gun-walking’ expose

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives is blocking the main whistleblower in the Fast and Furious case from publishing a book, claiming his retelling of the Mexico “gun-walking” scandal will hurt morale inside the embattled law enforcement agency, according to documents obtained by The Washington Times.

ATF’s dispute with Special Agent John Dodson is setting up a First Amendment showdown that is poised to bring together liberal groups like the American Civil Liberties Union and conservatives in Congress who have championed Mr. Dodson’s protection as a whistleblower.

{——SNIP——}

The battle also could have repercussions on Capitol Hill, where the two lead investigators who helped uncover the Fast and Furious scandal, Sen. Chuck Grassley, Iowa Republican, and House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell E. Issa, Calif. Republican, had written a foreword to the book, the sources said.

Now....... Exactly WHY wouldn't "the most transparent administration in history" want the lead whistleblower to publish a book about government unaccountability?

[RoyGBiv]

"the most transparently opaque administration in history"

Fixed.

[gthaustex]

It will be very interesting to see where this goes....nothing like airing out dirty laundry, shining sunlight in dark places.....

[powerboatr]

i would write it anyway..once its out, its out, they cant retract the book

[Fangs]

Post it in full online and ask for donations...

[johncanfield]

Dodson says it's going into print regardless of the ATF ruling and interestingly the ACLU has taken the case as a restriction to his right of free speech.

[jmra]

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 ... t-and-fur/
ATF tries to block whistleblowing agent’s Fast and Furious book
1st Amendment battle over ‘gun-walking’ expose

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives is blocking the main whistleblower in the Fast and Furious case from publishing a book, claiming his retelling of the Mexico “gun-walking” scandal will hurt morale inside the embattled law enforcement agency, according to documents obtained by The Washington Times.

ATF’s dispute with Special Agent John Dodson is setting up a First Amendment showdown that is poised to bring together liberal groups like the American Civil Liberties Union and conservatives in Congress who have championed Mr. Dodson’s protection as a whistleblower.

{——SNIP——}

The battle also could have repercussions on Capitol Hill, where the two lead investigators who helped uncover the Fast and Furious scandal, Sen. Chuck Grassley, Iowa Republican, and House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell E. Issa, Calif. Republican, had written a foreword to the book, the sources said.

Now....... Exactly WHY wouldn't "the most transparent administration in history" want the lead whistleblower to publish a book about government unaccountability?

The truth hurts!?

[Abraham]

The title of this thread states: ATF "TRIES" to block, but the article states: The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives "IS" blocking the main whistleblower...

So, which is it?

[The Annoyed Man]

The title of this thread states: ATF "TRIES" to block, but the article states: The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives "IS" blocking the main whistleblower...

So, which is it?

Well, I'd say that BATFE has made their move by trying to block publication; but the issue isn't over yet, so it IS blocked for now....until he has his day in court. Then it may not be blocked any longer. So, in this case, "IS" and "TRIES" are the same thing. It is only "IS" if it remains blocked.

Don't ask me what the definition of "IS" is.

[bagman45]

LOL, I'm having a Clinton flashback Well done, sir!!!

[jmra]

Don't ask me what the definition of "IS" is.

It is what it is unless it is not in which case it isn't.

[Dave2]

The title of this thread states: ATF "TRIES" to block, but the article states: The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives "IS" blocking the main whistleblower...

So, which is it?

Well, I'd say that BATFE has made their move by trying to block publication; but the issue isn't over yet, so it IS blocked for now....until he has his day in court. Then it may not be blocked any longer. So, in this case, "IS" and "TRIES" are the same thing. It is only "IS" if it remains blocked.

If the ATF is successful, I hope it'll end up on wikileaks or something.

[Jaguar]

Looks like the ATF has a new method for dealing with whistleblowers. A firing squad.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 ... ing-squad/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

...the Justice Department finds itself on the defensive after a training manual surfaced that suggests federal agents could face a firing squad for leaking government secrets.

[Dave2]

Looks like the ATF has a new method for dealing with whistleblowers. A firing squad.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 ... ing-squad/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

...the Justice Department finds itself on the defensive after a training manual surfaced that suggests federal agents could face a firing squad for leaking government secrets.

Well, I suppose if said leak ends up constituting treason and it occurs during wartime... I think that'd have to be a pretty unique set of circumstances, though.

[Jaguar]

Looks like the ATF has a new method for dealing with whistleblowers. A firing squad.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 ... ing-squad/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

...the Justice Department finds itself on the defensive after a training manual surfaced that suggests federal agents could face a firing squad for leaking government secrets.

Well, I suppose if said leak ends up constituting treason and it occurs during wartime... I think that'd have to be a pretty unique set of circumstances, though.

It wan't meant to be serious, just to look that way to keep them all in line.