Just got a call from the NRA wanting $400...

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

Topic author
APynckel
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 451
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 8:36 am
Location: N Houston

Re: Just got a call from the NRA wanting $400...

#16

Post by APynckel »

baldeagle wrote:
APynckel wrote:a) You cannot make something law inside this country, ESPECIALLY ONE THAT INFRINGES THE CONSTITUTION, without both houses of congress voting on it.
I think you had better read the Constitution. Article 2, Section 2, Clause 2 reads [The President] shall have Power, by and with Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur"

So, when it comes to treaties, the House is not involved at all. All it takes is for the Senate to approve the treaty by a two thirds majority, and the President to sign the treaty, and it becomes binding on the US. As to whether or not a treaty can abrogate the Constitution, it cannot, but that wouldn't stop our politicians from approving it anyway or the Executive branch from enforcing its provisions, Constitution notwithstanding.
But a treaty cannot nullify a constitutional amendment.
NRA Lifetime Member

bizarrenormality

Re: Just got a call from the NRA wanting $400...

#17

Post by bizarrenormality »

It was very liberating when I realized any organization with time and money to spam doesn't need any more of either from me.
User avatar

RoyGBiv
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 9579
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:41 am
Location: Fort Worth

Re: Just got a call from the NRA wanting $400...

#18

Post by RoyGBiv »

APynckel wrote:
baldeagle wrote:
APynckel wrote:a) You cannot make something law inside this country, ESPECIALLY ONE THAT INFRINGES THE CONSTITUTION, without both houses of congress voting on it.
I think you had better read the Constitution. Article 2, Section 2, Clause 2 reads [The President] shall have Power, by and with Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur"

So, when it comes to treaties, the House is not involved at all. All it takes is for the Senate to approve the treaty by a two thirds majority, and the President to sign the treaty, and it becomes binding on the US. As to whether or not a treaty can abrogate the Constitution, it cannot, but that wouldn't stop our politicians from approving it anyway or the Executive branch from enforcing its provisions, Constitution notwithstanding.
But a treaty cannot nullify a constitutional amendment.
That's what baldeagle said... see bold
I am not a lawyer. This is NOT legal advice.!
Nothing tempers idealism quite like the cold bath of reality.... SQLGeek
User avatar

Topic author
APynckel
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 451
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 8:36 am
Location: N Houston

Re: Just got a call from the NRA wanting $400...

#19

Post by APynckel »

RoyGBiv wrote:
APynckel wrote:
baldeagle wrote:
APynckel wrote:a) You cannot make something law inside this country, ESPECIALLY ONE THAT INFRINGES THE CONSTITUTION, without both houses of congress voting on it.
I think you had better read the Constitution. Article 2, Section 2, Clause 2 reads [The President] shall have Power, by and with Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur"

So, when it comes to treaties, the House is not involved at all. All it takes is for the Senate to approve the treaty by a two thirds majority, and the President to sign the treaty, and it becomes binding on the US. As to whether or not a treaty can abrogate the Constitution, it cannot, but that wouldn't stop our politicians from approving it anyway or the Executive branch from enforcing its provisions, Constitution notwithstanding.
But a treaty cannot nullify a constitutional amendment.
That's what baldeagle said... see bold
I know, I responded after only reading the first sentence.
NRA Lifetime Member
User avatar

Charles L. Cotton
Site Admin
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 17787
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX
Contact:

Re: Just got a call from the NRA wanting $400...

#20

Post by Charles L. Cotton »

APynckel wrote:
baldeagle wrote:
APynckel wrote:a) You cannot make something law inside this country, ESPECIALLY ONE THAT INFRINGES THE CONSTITUTION, without both houses of congress voting on it.
I think you had better read the Constitution. Article 2, Section 2, Clause 2 reads [The President] shall have Power, by and with Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur"

So, when it comes to treaties, the House is not involved at all. All it takes is for the Senate to approve the treaty by a two thirds majority, and the President to sign the treaty, and it becomes binding on the US. As to whether or not a treaty can abrogate the Constitution, it cannot, but that wouldn't stop our politicians from approving it anyway or the Executive branch from enforcing its provisions, Constitution notwithstanding.
But a treaty cannot nullify a constitutional amendment.
Heller was won by one vote. If/when it is revisited when Justice Kennedy or one of the four conservatives are off the bench and replaced with an anit-Second Amendment justice, then treaties can disarm Americans. The Second Amendment is just one heartbeat (Kennedy's) away from being history.

Chas.
User avatar

Topic author
APynckel
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 451
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 8:36 am
Location: N Houston

Re: Just got a call from the NRA wanting $400...

#21

Post by APynckel »

Charles L. Cotton wrote: Heller was won by one vote. If/when it is revisited when Justice Kennedy or one of the four conservatives are off the bench and replaced with an anit-Second Amendment justice, then treaties can disarm Americans. The Second Amendment is just one heartbeat (Kennedy's) away from being history.

Chas.
This is why we need to revoke Marbury v Madison.
NRA Lifetime Member

bizarrenormality

Re: Just got a call from the NRA wanting $400...

#22

Post by bizarrenormality »

S-S-S is not just for four legged wolves.

Cedar Park Dad
Banned
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 2064
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 7:19 am
Location: Cedar Park Texas

Re: Just got a call from the NRA wanting $400...

#23

Post by Cedar Park Dad »

APynckel wrote:
Charles L. Cotton wrote: Heller was won by one vote. If/when it is revisited when Justice Kennedy or one of the four conservatives are off the bench and replaced with an anit-Second Amendment justice, then treaties can disarm Americans. The Second Amendment is just one heartbeat (Kennedy's) away from being history.

Chas.
This is why we need to revoke Marbury v Madison.
I wouldn't hold your breath on that one boyo.

Pete92FS
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 513
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2009 11:57 am
Location: Houston

Re: Just got a call from the NRA wanting $400...

#24

Post by Pete92FS »

I got the same call earlier this week. Caller said they were a paid caller for the NRA and brought up the UN treaty - asked for $200.00. This call came from 703-939-9558. I have also received call from the NRA on 877-728-3486, 877-837-4130 and 703-988-6387. Usually multiple times a week. Anything with a 877 prefix i usually ignore - the 703 prefix fooled me - one tome only. :nono:
CHL since 01/26/09

Abraham
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 8403
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:43 am

Re: Just got a call from the NRA wanting $400...

#25

Post by Abraham »

Apparently, they don't solicit members who have a $10.00 membership as I've never gotten a single call or any sort of request for money, ever...

I guess they weed us out as "El Cheapos" and not worth their time.

Another benefit of an annual low cost membership.

Hooray!
User avatar

Topic author
APynckel
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 451
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 8:36 am
Location: N Houston

Re: Just got a call from the NRA wanting $400...

#26

Post by APynckel »

Cedar Park Dad wrote:I wouldn't hold your breath on that one boyo.

I am not, but fundamentally, it was the first mistake this country ever made. Giving SCOTUS the ability to dictate constitutionality, instead of relying on the 10th amendment.
Charles L. Cotton wrote:
Heller was won by one vote. If/when it is revisited when Justice Kennedy or one of the four conservatives are off the bench and replaced with an anit-Second Amendment justice, then treaties can disarm Americans. The Second Amendment is just one heartbeat (Kennedy's) away from being history.

Chas.
And that is why Marbury v Madison needs to go byebye. Time to let the states control themselves.
NRA Lifetime Member

cb1000rider
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2505
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 3:27 pm

Re: Just got a call from the NRA wanting $400...

#27

Post by cb1000rider »

bizarrenormality wrote:It was very liberating when I realized any organization with time and money to spam doesn't need any more of either from me.
Remember, the NRA gets paid for delivering you spam. Frequently, quite a lot of money. It doesn't matter if they're sending life insurance offers, discounts on car rentals, or purple widgets, they get a piece of delivering the message and a piece of whatever you buy. It's annoying, but it also helps supplement their war chest. I don't know if you can "opt out" of solicitations from the NRA, but that's where I would start.

BTW, lots of people reporting these calls: http://800notes.com/Phone.aspx/1-877-318-1086" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”