Employer search of your vehicle in parking lot?

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton


Renegade

#16

Post by Renegade »

mr surveyor wrote:what is the generally accepted legal defination of the phrase "on or about their person"?
1916 Wagner v. State: The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals ruled that a pistol is "about" one's person if the pistol can be reached without materially changing one's position.

txinvestigator
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 4331
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 6:40 pm
Location: DFW area
Contact:

#17

Post by txinvestigator »

Renegade wrote:
mr surveyor wrote:what is the generally accepted legal defination of the phrase "on or about their person"?
1916 Wagner v. State: The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals ruled that a pistol is "about" one's person if the pistol can be reached without materially changing one's position.
Yep. Later cases added that the passenger compartment of motor vehicles were included, if within the person immediate access. Glove boxes, center consoles, under the seat, etc.
*CHL Instructor*


"Speed is Fine, but accuracy is final"- Bill Jordan

Remember those who died, remember those who killed them.

mr surveyor
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 1918
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 11:42 pm
Location: NE TX

#18

Post by mr surveyor »

given that the person drives into the parking lot and parks the vehicle, would the "about their person" clause fit if the driver had his weapon in the console between the seats, easily within reach?
It's not gun control that we need, it's soul control!
User avatar

seamusTX
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 9
Posts: 13551
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:04 pm
Location: Galveston

#19

Post by seamusTX »

mr surveyor wrote:what is the generally accepted legal defination of the phrase "on or about their person"?
My understanding is in your hand, in a holster, in a pocket, tucked into your belt, in a bag that you are carrying, or within reach without shifting your position (for example, in the center console of a vehicle).

There have been some Supreme Court cases where people were acquitted for having weapons under the seat of a car, though it's worth noting they were busted, tried, and found guilty in lower court.

- Jim

mr surveyor
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 1918
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 11:42 pm
Location: NE TX

#20

Post by mr surveyor »

I guess what I'm trying to nail down is the difference between chl and non licensed person with a gun in the console of their vehicle in a 30.06 posted parking lot.
It's not gun control that we need, it's soul control!
User avatar

seamusTX
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 9
Posts: 13551
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:04 pm
Location: Galveston

#21

Post by seamusTX »

mr surveyor wrote:I guess what I'm trying to nail down is the difference between chl and non licensed person with a gun in the console of their vehicle in a 30.06 posted parking lot.
Until 2005, the non-licensed person would have been guilty of PC 46.02 UCW, in most circumstances. The CHL holder would have been guilty of 30.06 criminal trespass.

The modification of the traveling law in 2005 made most people in privately owned motor vehicles travelers, and thus not violating 46.02.

Now, there are two ways of looking at this:
  • If the CHL holder is carrying under the authority of his license, he is violating 30.06
  • If everyone in a vehicle is a traveler, then the CHL holder is not carrying under the authority of his license and is not violating 30.06
I don't know of any such case ever occuring. (Dickens was right.)

- Jim

mr surveyor
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 1918
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 11:42 pm
Location: NE TX

#22

Post by mr surveyor »

thank you for a very clear answer :smile:
It's not gun control that we need, it's soul control!

srothstein
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5298
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:27 pm
Location: Luling, TX

#23

Post by srothstein »

Renegade wrote:On another note, I would love to see a company manual that complies with 30.06, would be pretty big.
Just for technical accuracy, the size of the lettering only applies if it is on a sign. A handbook can have any legible lettering, as long as the wording matches the legal requirements.
Steve Rothstein

Renegade

#24

Post by Renegade »

srothstein wrote:
Renegade wrote:On another note, I would love to see a company manual that complies with 30.06, would be pretty big.
Just for technical accuracy, the size of the lettering only applies if it is on a sign. A handbook can have any legible lettering, as long as the wording matches the legal requirements.
Thanks for the correction.
User avatar

Mithras61
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 913
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 8:43 pm
Location: Somewhere in Texas

#25

Post by Mithras61 »

txinvestigator wrote:
Mithras61 wrote:The company does NEED probable cause, though. They can just demand that as a condition of your continued employment they get to search your vehicle. If you consent and have a firearm, and that violates company policy, then they can fire you.
Upon further review of your statement, it appears you meant that the company does not need probable cause. Yes?
Yes. Thanks for folowing up on it. Sometimes the connec tion between my keyboard & brain is a little poor... :grin:

Topic author
jazr45acp
Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 63
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 1:19 pm
Location: New Braunfels TX

#26

Post by jazr45acp »

So, if your employer takes your keys without your permission and unlocks your vehicle, finds a "smokewagon" can they fire you then? Do you have any grounds for criminal trespass charges against them? Thanks for the wealth of info gentlemen. Hope you guys have a wonderful work day. :grin:
Last edited by jazr45acp on Wed May 23, 2007 9:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
In Christ,

Joel C.
User avatar

seamusTX
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 9
Posts: 13551
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:04 pm
Location: Galveston

#27

Post by seamusTX »

jazr45acp wrote:So, if your employer takes your keys without your permission and unlocks your vehicle, finds a "smokewagon" can they can fire you then?
In Texas, your employer can fire you at any time for any reason or no reason, unless you're covered by an employment contract of some kind.

In your proposed scenario, I don't know if they would be guilty of theft, trespassing, or unauthorized use of a motor vehicle.

- Jim

pbandjelly

#28

Post by pbandjelly »

Wahl, they'd be guilty of a butt-whoopin' if'n they broke in mah truck!!!
:lol: :smilelol5:

I doubt they'd be taken for any criminal charge, since you agreed to allow them to search your vehicle whenever they want when you cashed that paycheck.

KD5NRH
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 3119
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 3:25 am
Location: Stephenville TX

#29

Post by KD5NRH »

seamusTX wrote:
jazr45acp wrote:So, if your employer takes your keys without your permission and unlocks your vehicle, finds a "smokewagon" can they can fire you then?
In Texas, your employer can fire you at any time for any reason or no reason, unless you're covered by an employment contract of some kind.

In your proposed scenario, I don't know if they would be guilty of theft, trespassing, or unauthorized use of a motor vehicle.
That would make for some tricky arguments, especially in my case, since I keep the car keys on me at all times, and will resign rather than allow them to be taken by anyone I don't trust not to do the above. So, they'd either have to take the keys by force (robbery) or break into the car. (an interesting list of possibilities there, especially since I work night shifts) If it's worth all that to them to get me fired, something's screwy to start with.
User avatar

Crossfire
Moderator
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5404
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 10:27 am
Location: DFW
Contact:

#30

Post by Crossfire »

jazr45acp wrote:So, if your employer takes your keys without your permission and unlocks your vehicle, finds a "smokewagon" can they fire you then? Do you have any grounds for criminal trespass charges against them? Thanks for the wealth of info gentlemen. Hope you guys have a wonderful work day. :grin:
No employer is going to take your keys without permission to search your personal vehicle. That is just pushing this scenario a little too far.

What is more reasonable is that they will ask for permission to search, and your failure to grant permission will result in your termination.
Texas LTC Instructor, FFL, IdentoGO Fingerprinting Partner
http://www.Crossfire-Training.com
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”