1916 Wagner v. State: The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals ruled that a pistol is "about" one's person if the pistol can be reached without materially changing one's position.mr surveyor wrote:what is the generally accepted legal defination of the phrase "on or about their person"?
Employer search of your vehicle in parking lot?
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 4331
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 6:40 pm
- Location: DFW area
- Contact:
Yep. Later cases added that the passenger compartment of motor vehicles were included, if within the person immediate access. Glove boxes, center consoles, under the seat, etc.Renegade wrote:1916 Wagner v. State: The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals ruled that a pistol is "about" one's person if the pistol can be reached without materially changing one's position.mr surveyor wrote:what is the generally accepted legal defination of the phrase "on or about their person"?
*CHL Instructor*
"Speed is Fine, but accuracy is final"- Bill Jordan
Remember those who died, remember those who killed them.
"Speed is Fine, but accuracy is final"- Bill Jordan
Remember those who died, remember those who killed them.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 5
- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 11:42 pm
- Location: NE TX
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 9
- Posts: 13551
- Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:04 pm
- Location: Galveston
My understanding is in your hand, in a holster, in a pocket, tucked into your belt, in a bag that you are carrying, or within reach without shifting your position (for example, in the center console of a vehicle).mr surveyor wrote:what is the generally accepted legal defination of the phrase "on or about their person"?
There have been some Supreme Court cases where people were acquitted for having weapons under the seat of a car, though it's worth noting they were busted, tried, and found guilty in lower court.
- Jim
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 5
- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 11:42 pm
- Location: NE TX
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 9
- Posts: 13551
- Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:04 pm
- Location: Galveston
Until 2005, the non-licensed person would have been guilty of PC 46.02 UCW, in most circumstances. The CHL holder would have been guilty of 30.06 criminal trespass.mr surveyor wrote:I guess what I'm trying to nail down is the difference between chl and non licensed person with a gun in the console of their vehicle in a 30.06 posted parking lot.
The modification of the traveling law in 2005 made most people in privately owned motor vehicles travelers, and thus not violating 46.02.
Now, there are two ways of looking at this:
- If the CHL holder is carrying under the authority of his license, he is violating 30.06
- If everyone in a vehicle is a traveler, then the CHL holder is not carrying under the authority of his license and is not violating 30.06
- Jim
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 5
- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 11:42 pm
- Location: NE TX
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 5298
- Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:27 pm
- Location: Luling, TX
Just for technical accuracy, the size of the lettering only applies if it is on a sign. A handbook can have any legible lettering, as long as the wording matches the legal requirements.Renegade wrote:On another note, I would love to see a company manual that complies with 30.06, would be pretty big.
Steve Rothstein
Thanks for the correction.srothstein wrote:Just for technical accuracy, the size of the lettering only applies if it is on a sign. A handbook can have any legible lettering, as long as the wording matches the legal requirements.Renegade wrote:On another note, I would love to see a company manual that complies with 30.06, would be pretty big.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 913
- Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 8:43 pm
- Location: Somewhere in Texas
Yes. Thanks for folowing up on it. Sometimes the connec tion between my keyboard & brain is a little poor...txinvestigator wrote:Upon further review of your statement, it appears you meant that the company does not need probable cause. Yes?Mithras61 wrote:The company does NEED probable cause, though. They can just demand that as a condition of your continued employment they get to search your vehicle. If you consent and have a firearm, and that violates company policy, then they can fire you.
-
Topic author - Member
- Posts in topic: 6
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 1:19 pm
- Location: New Braunfels TX
So, if your employer takes your keys without your permission and unlocks your vehicle, finds a "smokewagon" can they fire you then? Do you have any grounds for criminal trespass charges against them? Thanks for the wealth of info gentlemen. Hope you guys have a wonderful work day.
Last edited by jazr45acp on Wed May 23, 2007 9:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
In Christ,
Joel C.
Joel C.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 9
- Posts: 13551
- Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:04 pm
- Location: Galveston
In Texas, your employer can fire you at any time for any reason or no reason, unless you're covered by an employment contract of some kind.jazr45acp wrote:So, if your employer takes your keys without your permission and unlocks your vehicle, finds a "smokewagon" can they can fire you then?
In your proposed scenario, I don't know if they would be guilty of theft, trespassing, or unauthorized use of a motor vehicle.
- Jim
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 3119
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 3:25 am
- Location: Stephenville TX
That would make for some tricky arguments, especially in my case, since I keep the car keys on me at all times, and will resign rather than allow them to be taken by anyone I don't trust not to do the above. So, they'd either have to take the keys by force (robbery) or break into the car. (an interesting list of possibilities there, especially since I work night shifts) If it's worth all that to them to get me fired, something's screwy to start with.seamusTX wrote:In Texas, your employer can fire you at any time for any reason or no reason, unless you're covered by an employment contract of some kind.jazr45acp wrote:So, if your employer takes your keys without your permission and unlocks your vehicle, finds a "smokewagon" can they can fire you then?
In your proposed scenario, I don't know if they would be guilty of theft, trespassing, or unauthorized use of a motor vehicle.
-
- Moderator
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 5404
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 10:27 am
- Location: DFW
- Contact:
No employer is going to take your keys without permission to search your personal vehicle. That is just pushing this scenario a little too far.jazr45acp wrote:So, if your employer takes your keys without your permission and unlocks your vehicle, finds a "smokewagon" can they fire you then? Do you have any grounds for criminal trespass charges against them? Thanks for the wealth of info gentlemen. Hope you guys have a wonderful work day.
What is more reasonable is that they will ask for permission to search, and your failure to grant permission will result in your termination.