Moral vs Ethical carry on 30.06

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton


Topic author
Dirthawking
Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 199
Joined: Sun Jun 02, 2013 3:48 pm

Moral vs Ethical carry on 30.06

#1

Post by Dirthawking »

We all know the law says the 30.06 signs have to meet certain standards. That is not my question.

The way I see it, is even if the sign is not "legal", it is obvious that business does not want me, nor my money there. So I don't shop at or visit those companies. No reason to give them my money. I also let all my friends know as well.

Where do you draw your line?
Some people simply need a high five, to the face, with a chair!
User avatar

Keith B
Moderator
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 18503
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: Moral vs Ethical carry on 30.06

#2

Post by Keith B »

This has been discussed ad infinitum on the forum in the past. Basically it boils down to each individual and what they are willing to chance. We all know what a legal sign is, but those that are close may cause you to be arrested and charged and you will then have to spend money to go through the legal process to try and be found not guilty.

So, bottom line, everyone must make their own decision on whether to pass a 30.06 that is not up the the legal requirements.
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4

RottenApple
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 1772
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 3:19 pm

Re: Moral vs Ethical carry on 30.06

#3

Post by RottenApple »

Keith, I don't think that's quite what he's asking. I think he's saying that if a business displays any "no gun" sign, then we shouldn't go in. And you're right, it has been discuss extensively here.

To the OP: Frankly, I disagree. We don't know why the owner/manager chose to put up a "no gun" sign. Perhaps their insurance required it, perhaps they just want to make their gun-fearing clientele feel safer, perhaps they trebly want to ban guns from their store and are too incompetent/lazy to look up the legal requirements to do so. Do you know why? I certainly don't. The ONLY way to know for sure, with 100% certainty, that the owner/manager does not want (for whatever reason) concealed handguns in their establishment is for them to post a correct and valid 30.06 sign.

Therefore I will continue to ignore and carry past any and all "no guns" sign that does not comply (or come reasonably close - 3/4" letters, for example) with 30.06.

YMMV
User avatar

mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 9045
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: Moral vs Ethical carry on 30.06

#4

Post by mojo84 »

RottenApple wrote:Keith, I don't think that's quite what he's asking. I think he's saying that if a business displays any "no gun" sign, then we shouldn't go in. And you're right, it has been discuss extensively here.

To the OP: Frankly, I disagree. We don't know why the owner/manager chose to put up a "no gun" sign. Perhaps their insurance required it, perhaps they just want to make their gun-fearing clientele feel safer, perhaps they trebly want to ban guns from their store and are too incompetent/lazy to look up the legal requirements to do so. Do you know why? I certainly don't. The ONLY way to know for sure, with 100% certainty, that the owner/manager does not want (for whatever reason) concealed handguns in their establishment is for them to post a correct and valid 30.06 sign.

Therefore I will continue to ignore and carry past any and all "no guns" sign that does not comply (or come reasonably close - 3/4" letters, for example) with 30.06.

YMMV
Do you know of any specific instance an insurance company required a no gun sign be put up by an insured business? I have been in the insurance business a long time and have never seen it or even heard of it.

The only time the carrying of guns comes up is if security guards are hired.
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.

RottenApple
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 1772
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 3:19 pm

Re: Moral vs Ethical carry on 30.06

#5

Post by RottenApple »

mojo84 wrote:Do you know of any specific instance an insurance company required a no gun sign be put up by an insured business? I have been in the insurance business a long time and have never seen it or even heard of it.

The only time the carrying of guns comes up is if security guards are hired.
There was one poster on here who claimed that their insurance company required it. Was s/he telling the truth? I've got no idea, but I've got no reason to doubt him/her either.

TBH, it doesn't really matter. It's a common excuse that is given for the posting of "no gun" signs. Regardless of whether its true or not, my point still stands: Unless it is a compliant 30.06 sign, there is no way to know what the owner/manager's intentions were.

Weg
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 574
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 1:06 pm

Re: Moral vs Ethical carry on 30.06

#6

Post by Weg »

Well, i'll speak for myself...but, I have a moral duty to protect daughters/my wife/myself in that order. I have carried both legally and illegally my entire life ( in my mid 40's). I carry weekly in places that if caught I could lose my job at the least, and go to jail at the worst. You have to make that decision yourself.

RottenApple
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 1772
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 3:19 pm

Re: Moral vs Ethical carry on 30.06

#7

Post by RottenApple »

glock27 wrote:
Weg wrote:Well, i'll speak for myself...but, I have a moral duty to protect daughters/my wife/myself in that order. I have carried both legally and illegally my entire life ( in my mid 40's). I carry weekly in places that if caught I could lose my job at the least, and go to jail at the worst.You have to make that decision yourself.

:iagree:

your not alone on this one

glad im not the only "outlaw" on this board, :cheers2:
Not by a long shot. :cheers2:

Topic author
Dirthawking
Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 199
Joined: Sun Jun 02, 2013 3:48 pm

Re: Moral vs Ethical carry on 30.06

#8

Post by Dirthawking »

Okay, I am not asking Legal here.

Let me put it this way. You and your family are on your way out to dinner. You stop at a restaurant and notice they have a 30.06 sign on the door (legal sign or not), do you:

A. Lock your gun up and go inside and enjoy a nice meal with your family

OR

B. Find someplace else to eat that welcomes CHL
Some people simply need a high five, to the face, with a chair!
User avatar

Jaguar
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 1332
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 5:24 pm
Location: Just west of Cool, Texas

Re: Moral vs Ethical carry on 30.06

#9

Post by Jaguar »

Dirthawking wrote:Okay, I am not asking Legal here.

Let me put it this way. You and your family are on your way out to dinner. You stop at a restaurant and notice they have a 30.06 sign on the door (legal sign or not), do you:

A. Lock your gun up and go inside and enjoy a nice meal with your family

OR

B. Find someplace else to eat that welcomes CHL
Legal or not makes all the difference to me.

If not, I ignore it and go have a nice meal with my family. If it is a legal sign, I find some place else to enjoy a nice meal. Unless there is no other venue that has the accommodations I want, I will not disarm - and restaurants do not generally fall into that category.
"I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." -- James Madison

chuck j
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1983
Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 12:44 pm

Re: Moral vs Ethical carry on 30.06

#10

Post by chuck j »

Dirthawking wrote:Okay, I am not asking Legal here.

Let me put it this way. You and your family are on your way out to dinner. You stop at a restaurant and notice they have a 30.06 sign on the door (legal sign or not), do you:

A. Lock your gun up and go inside and enjoy a nice meal with your family

OR

B. Find someplace else to eat that welcomes CHL
I go somewhere else to eat and do not return , plenty of eating joints around .
User avatar

tomtexan
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1186
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 7:42 pm
Location: Henderson County, TX

Re: Moral vs Ethical carry on 30.06

#11

Post by tomtexan »

I happened upon this sign today. I just went on through the gate. I had tobacco products too! :biggrinjester:

Image
The laws that forbid the carrying of arms... disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.
NRA Life Member

RottenApple
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 1772
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 3:19 pm

Re: Moral vs Ethical carry on 30.06

#12

Post by RottenApple »

Jaguar wrote:Legal or not makes all the difference to me.

If not, I ignore it and go have a nice meal with my family. If it is a legal sign, I find some place else to enjoy a nice meal. Unless there is no other venue that has the accommodations I want, I will not disarm - and restaurants do not generally fall into that category.
:iagree:

If its a valid 30.06, go somewhere else. If its not, carry away.
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”