Postby Beiruty » Thu May 23, 2013 10:50 am
This purely a savage criminal murder in a daylight. This serve no political issue or otherwise.
I'm afraid I don't understand your point.
When Clint Eastwood, in a Dirty Harry movie referred to a naked man running down the street with a meat cleaver chasing a woman, yeah, I would say that incident, if it were real, would serve no political issue or otherwise... Unless of course, feminists got a hold of it and used it to ban naked men, or meat cleavers... I'm surprised cars haven't been banned and for that matter, breathing hasn't been banned by environmentalists who opposed humans who pour out CO2 into our environment... Anyway...
As for political issues, a certain 'peaceful religion' has greatly politicized it's 'beliefs' all over the world, even in this country.
So the politics of this particular 'peaceful religion', are very well known.
The "alleged" (and self-confessed) murderer took pains to not only grant at least one video interview to a bystander, he made it very clear he did it on behalf of muslims. He even suggested the British act to remove their own government, which of course, would be a POLITICAL statement:
"We swear by almighty Allah we will never stop fighting you. The only reason we have done this is because Muslims are dying every day. This British soldier is an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth."
"You people will never be safe. Remove your governments — they don't care about you."
That was a political statement by an avowed muslim who murdered an innocent man on behalf of his religion.
This person in Woolwich England may not have planned it in the same way that Bin Laden planned the 9/11 attacks, but it's quite clear his actions closely mirror those of Major Nidal Hassan who got up from the table he was seated at, got up, and yelled " "Allahu Akbar!" and began his murderous rampage until he killed 13 and injured another 30.
The irony of the Ft. Hood shooting is, as I understand it, ARMY military personnel on their own base, are not allowed to be armed.
At any rate, it is quite clear to any objective observer that both incidents are religiously motivated.
I don't hear about the numerous incidents of Catholic, Protest, Christian, or Jewish homicide bombers or shooters who go on a rampage against innocent men, women and children.
But we all know about a certain 'peaceful religion' which tends to breed homicidal maniacs in increasing numbers who think they're doing their religion and 'brothers', a great service when they murder innocents any way they can.
It's become painfully obvious that the Boston Marathon bombers were also motivated by their religion, Islam.
The following website @
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Is ... st_attacks" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; makes for interesting reading.
The first two entries are as follows:
Germany"Munich Massacre" in Germany by Islamic "Black September" militants, 1972.
Saudi ArabiaGrand Mosque Seizure in Saudi Arabia, 1979. Approx. 250 Dead, 600 wounded.
I also seem to recall the incident initiated by ISLAMIC militants in Breslin, Russia (From:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beslan_sch ... age_crisis" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;) where over 380 people, including 186 children were brutally murdered, many shot in the head or the back as they tried to escape, others just shot in the head execution style:
"The Beslan school hostage crisis (also referred to as the Beslan school siege or Beslan massacre)[2][3][4] of early September 2004 lasted three days and involved the capture of over 1,100 people as hostages (including 777 children),[5] ending with the death of over 380 people. The crisis began when a group of armed Islamic separatist militants,"
There seems to be a pattern here... Yet some actually would say America IS NOT at war with Islam. Uh, why not? And others (sadly, including Republicans) would say that it is "Radical Islam" that is to blame for 'radicalizing' those who commit these atrocities.
Yeah, and it was ONLY 'radical islamists' all over the world who had street parties on September 11th, 2001 when our fellow Americans were murdered.
So back on point, I don't understand yours.
Respectfully...