Here's the vid: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-22562372" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6799d/6799df3355de8268dff0a515595298d99d6e360b" alt="Patriot :patriot:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00ce3/00ce3d2e461e5d35cea5e3f7252f26cb5ef429fd" alt="Texas Flag :txflag:"
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
It is Bush's fault.mr surveyor wrote:seems to me that chem and bio weapons used to be considered "WMD". And I seem to remember that saddam was moving massive convoys into Syria, presumed to be loaded with the same when the heat was really on him. Now, two questions: 1. did Syria get their chem/bio stash from days long past? 2. Are chem/bio weapons still considered "WMD"?
Did saddam possess WMD's? (I think so, in fact)