Rights and Duties while under Citizens Arrest?

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton


Topic author
Will938
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 355
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 4:08 am
Location: Houston / College Station

Rights and Duties while under Citizens Arrest?

#1

Post by Will938 »

Are there any? Do you even have to recognize it?

If you have or have not committed a crime and someone attempted to detain you would you have to put up with it?

Would you have to stay there if they did take you down?

Could you fight back?

Just seemed like an interesting question.

AG-EE
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 168
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 3:31 pm
Location: Greensboro, NC

#2

Post by AG-EE »

That is very thin ice. If you haven't done anything and someone tried to detain you with force, you can certainly respond with force, and then press charges against them.

txinvestigator
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 4331
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 6:40 pm
Location: DFW area
Contact:

#3

Post by txinvestigator »

I teach this in my Guard classes, as guards arrest with the same authority as any other person.

Here is the law;


Texas Code of Criminal Procedure
Art. 14.01. Offense within view.†
(a) A peace officer or any other person, may, without a
warrant, arrest an offender when the offense is committed in his
presence or within his view, if the offense is one classed as a felony
or as an offense against the public peace.





Art. 18.16. Preventing consequences of theft.

Any person has a right to prevent the consequences of theft by
seizing any personal property that has been stolen and bringing it,
with the person suspected of committing the theft, if that person can
be taken, before a magistrate for examination, or delivering the
property and the person suspected of committing the theft to a peace
officer for that purpose. To justify a seizure under this article,
there must be reasonable ground to believe the property is stolen, and
the seizure must be openly made and the proceedings had without delay.


Texas Civil Practices Act
§124.001. Detention.

A person who reasonably believes that another has stolen or is
attempting to steal property is privileged to detain that person in a
reasonable manner and for a reasonable time to investigate ownership
of the property.




Texas Penal Code
§9.51. Arrest and search.

(b) A person other than a peace officer (or one acting at his
direction) is justified in using force against another when and to the
degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to
make or assist in making a lawful arrest, or to prevent or assist in
preventing escape after lawful arrest if, before using force, the actor
manifests his purpose to and the reason for the arrest or reasonably
believes his purpose and the reason are already known by or cannot
reasonably be made known to the person to be arrested.


(d) A person other than a peace officer acting in a peace
officer's presence and at his direction is justified in using deadly
force against another when and to the degree the person reasonably
believes the deadly force is immediately necessary to make a lawful
arrest, or to prevent escape after a lawful arrest, if the use of
force would have been justified under Subsection (b) and:

(1) the actor reasonably believes the felony or offense
against the public peace for which arrest is authorized included the
use or attempted use of deadly force; or

(2) the actor reasonably believes there is a substantial risk
that the person to be arrested will cause death or serious bodily
injury to another if the arrest is delayed.

(e) There is no duty to retreat before using deadly force
justified by Subsection (c) or (d).

(f) Nothing in this section relating to the actor's manifestation
of purpose or identity shall be construed as conflicting with any other law
relating to the issuance, service, and execution of an arrest or search
warrant either under the laws of this state or the United States.

(g) Deadly force may only be used under the circumstances
enumerated in Subsections (c) and (d).



So any person may arrest IF the offense is committed in his presence or view, and IF it is a Felony or a Breach of the Peace. Also a person may arrest to prevent the consequences of theft.

As you can see, force can be used to effect that arrest.

One must be very careful, as mishandling an arrest can result in criminal charges against you. If you arrest a person you have restrained them.


Texas Penal Code 20.01
(1) "Restrain" means to restrict a person's movements without
consent, so as to interfere substantially with the person's liberty,
by moving the person from one place to another or by confining the
person. Restraint is "without consent" if it is accomplished by:

(A) force, intimidation, or deception;


If you arrested for a non-felony, non- breach of the peace or had no reasonable grounds to believe the person committed a theft, then you have committed unlawful restraint; a class A Misdemeanor or Felony, depending on circumstances.

If you use or threaten deadly force to make the arrest that is not an arrestable offense, it is Kidnapping, a felony.

There are no provisions in the law to make it illegal to resist a person who is a non-Peace Officer. (unless the person making the arrest is acting at the direction of a peace officer).

The problem in resisting is that if the person was justified in restraining you, you could be charged with assault for resisting.

Most people have no idea what felonies are, or what constitutes a breach of the peace.

Hope this helps some.
*CHL Instructor*


"Speed is Fine, but accuracy is final"- Bill Jordan

Remember those who died, remember those who killed them.
User avatar

seamusTX
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 13551
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:04 pm
Location: Galveston

#4

Post by seamusTX »

Thanks for the informative answer, TXI. This is something that I see discussed, and I'm not satisfied that I understand it.

In general, if you are going about your business and someone tries to stop you or make you come with them, you are not obliged to do so, right?

The gray area for me is retail store personnel. If they suspect you of theft, they are legally justified in detaining or chasing you.

In that case, what do you advise an honest citizen to do?

BTW, I'm thinking not only of mean-looking old guys like myself but young women and other vulnerable people.

- Jim
User avatar

age_ranger
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1167
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 4:11 pm
Location: Plano, Tx

#5

Post by age_ranger »

(e) There is no duty to retreat before using deadly force
justified by Subsection (c) or (d).

That's interesting!!!
http://www.berettaforum.net" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


Just remember: Your very best thinking got you where you are now!!!

HankB
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1394
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 2:03 pm
Location: Central TX, just west of Austin

#6

Post by HankB »

I don't commit crimes like robbery, theft, shoplifting, drug offenses, etc.

Still, regardless of my innocence, I would not resist an arrest being performed by a clearly-identifiable LEO - the place to fight with cops is in court, using a lawyer as the weapon of choice.

I would be most disinclined to co-operate with any attempted detention or "arrest" by a non-LEO . . . and under most circumstances, would regard any initiation of physical force by the other as assault, and react appropriately.

I'd also be disinclined to "arrest" someone - I'm not a cop, and I don't play one on TV - and it would have to be a very unusual situation for me to use deadly force if my life or the life of a loved one weren't in danger.
Original CHL: 2000: 56 day turnaround
1st renewal, 2004: 34 days
2nd renewal, 2008: 81 days
3rd renewal, 2013: 12 days
User avatar

Crossfire
Moderator
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5405
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 10:27 am
Location: DFW
Contact:

#7

Post by Crossfire »

txinvestigator wrote: Most people have no idea what felonies are, or what constitutes a breach of the peace.
OK, so what constitutes a breach of the peace?
Texas LTC Instructor, FFL, IdentoGO Fingerprinting Partner
http://www.Crossfire-Training.com

txinvestigator
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 4331
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 6:40 pm
Location: DFW area
Contact:

#8

Post by txinvestigator »

Retail stores......... If the security buzzer goes off that IS reasonable cause for them to inspect your bag against your receipt. I've had it happen to me when the tag didn't get demagnetized.

Places that want to inspect EVERY receipt do not, IMO, meet the "reasonable belief" requirement.

There is no penalty for not stopping and submitting to arrest by a non-LEO. However, as I already wrote, if you resist with force you could be additionally charged with assault.

I would not put too much worry over the issue, it is not at all common.
*CHL Instructor*


"Speed is Fine, but accuracy is final"- Bill Jordan

Remember those who died, remember those who killed them.
User avatar

gregthehand
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1399
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 5:48 pm
Location: NW Houston, TX

#9

Post by gregthehand »

Bottom line here, if you want to give up your day job to become a cop so you can arrest people do so. IF you witness a crime and you don't have the legal "authority" to pull your weapon, you shouldn't be trying to do anything else but to be a good witness. Even at the law enforcement agency I worked at they didn't want us making arrests off duty unless someone's life, personal safety, or great financial loss was at stake. He reason for this is that when your out their on your own without a radio, and immediate back-up then your simple arrest can turn bad quick. Also if you don't know how to make an you can really screw it up. Street criminals TRAIN in prison how to resist arrest, and take guns away from cops and kill them with their own duty weapon. IF your not trained how to properly make an arrest, proserve evidence, and carry a pair of cuffs you don't need to try it. Bottom line, be a good witness. Now if someone trys to arrest you and they aren't a cop, and you know you haven't done anything wrong, then I would resist. There are too many wanna be fake cops running around. Remember resiting arrest charges only applies to cops, and citizens acting under the authority of a peace officer.
My posts on this website are worth every cent you paid me for them.

txinvestigator
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 4331
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 6:40 pm
Location: DFW area
Contact:

#10

Post by txinvestigator »

llwatson wrote:
txinvestigator wrote: Most people have no idea what felonies are, or what constitutes a breach of the peace.
OK, so what constitutes a breach of the peace?
This is a lesson in and of itself Linda. I am hesitant to get into it here just from a time and my poor typing skills perspective.

For example, one of the breaches of peace is disorderly conduct. Here is ONE section of DO;


§42.01. Disorderly conduct.

(a) A person commits an offense if he intentionally or
knowingly:

(1) uses abusive, indecent, profane, or vulgar language in a
public place, and the language by its very utterance tends to incite
an immediate breach of the peace;


Notice it requires the language occur in a "public place". Where is that? Also the language, "BY ITS VERY UTTERANCE, must tend to incite an Immediate Breach of the peace".

What does that mean? When I ask in class I usually get several people who answer "if the language offends someone"....That is incorrect. The statute lists nothing about a person being offended. it requires a MUCH higher level than being offended. There has been case law on this, and it basically means that the language would cause a man of normal temperament to rise to violence.

That is much different than being offended.

There are 8 or 9 more just in DO alone, plus 4 or 5 other violations that are breaches of the peace.

Public Intoxication is NOT a breach of the peace.
*CHL Instructor*


"Speed is Fine, but accuracy is final"- Bill Jordan

Remember those who died, remember those who killed them.

txinvestigator
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 8
Posts: 4331
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 6:40 pm
Location: DFW area
Contact:

#11

Post by txinvestigator »

gregthehand wrote:Bottom line here, if you want to give up your day job to become a cop so you can arrest people do so.
Or a Security Guard............. ;-)

I can think of but a few instances where I would try to arrest as a Non-LEO. If I caught someone trying to commit a crime against me or my property, I might, depending on the circumstances.

Or like last week, when a neighborhood 18 year old grabbed a butcher knife from her house and chased another teen with it in the street over an argument they had on the school bus. The neighbor who saw it happen had a handgun available, but told me later he was not sure of his legal status to intervene with his gun, so he called 911 and watched events unfold from his window.

I have no doubt as to what I would have done.
IF you witness a crime and you don't have the legal "authority" to pull your weapon, you shouldn't be trying to do anything else but to be a good witness. Even at the law enforcement agency I worked at they didn't want us making arrests off duty unless someone's life, personal safety, or great financial loss was at stake. He reason for this is that when your out their on your own without a radio, and immediate back-up then your simple arrest can turn bad quick. Also if you don't know how to make an you can really screw it up. Street criminals TRAIN in prison how to resist arrest, and take guns away from cops and kill them with their own duty weapon. IF your not trained how to properly make an arrest, proserve evidence, and carry a pair of cuffs you don't need to try it. Bottom line, be a good witness. Now if someone trys to arrest you and they aren't a cop, and you know you haven't done anything wrong, then I would resist. There are too many wanna be fake cops running around. Remember resiting arrest charges only applies to cops, and citizens acting under the authority of a peace officer.
Exellent points.
*CHL Instructor*


"Speed is Fine, but accuracy is final"- Bill Jordan

Remember those who died, remember those who killed them.

srothstein
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5305
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:27 pm
Location: Luling, TX

#12

Post by srothstein »

TXI has pretty well covered most of this issue. I wanted to add a little to make sure everyone is aware of a few of the fine points.

One I especially like is the arrest to prevent the consequences of the theft. Any person can do this BUT, please note the code exactly. This is not an authority to arrest a thief, but an authority to seize the stolen property first, and then the thief IF he can be seized. In other words, if the thief does not have the property in his possession, you better not try to arrest him. To further this, I usually point out that this section is not under the chapter covering arrest authorities, but is covered in the search warrant section, further indicating its emphasis on property.

Also, note the wording of the authority to arrest for non-felonies. The old wording was a breach of the peace and it now reads against the public peace. I have seen many people argue that this covers all offenses since they are all charged as against the peace and dignity of the State of Texas. I agree with TXI that this is just those offenses that are a breach of the peace and occurs in public. Most of disorderly conduct is covered, and assaults that happen in public are. I am not sure a burglary of a motor vehicle would be covered. But this is a very vague area of the law that is not used very often.

The most common use of citizen's arrest laws is by retail personnel and uniformed security guards. The very grayness of this law is one of the reasons that most of the major chains do not allow their personnel to stop anyone except under the most limited circumstances. Many do not prosecute but instead bar the person from the premises just to avoid this mess.
Steve Rothstein
User avatar

jimlongley
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 6134
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 1:31 pm
Location: Allen, TX

#13

Post by jimlongley »

gregthehand wrote:Bottom line here, if you want to give up your day job to become a cop so you can arrest people do so.
I don't have a day job, but none of the PDs will hire me, something about being way too old with poor hearing and bad knees. :lol: I even got shot down for a dispatcher job a while back because my hearing wasn't up to standard. :cry:
Real gun control, carrying 24/7/365

TxBlonde
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 263
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:37 pm
Location: Mabank, Tx
Contact:

#14

Post by TxBlonde »

Thank TI, I printed that out for "In the future" matters

KBCraig
Banned
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5251
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 3:32 am
Location: Texarkana

#15

Post by KBCraig »

It's probably time to point out that the original post wasn't asking our authority to effect a citizen's arrest, but rather what duty we have to comply if someone is trying to effect a citizen's arrest against us.

And to some up: if you're innocent, and a non-LEO citizen is trying to use deadly force or threat of deadly force to arrest you, then they're trying to kidnap you, and you are clear to resist the same way you would any other kidnapping.

If they assault you, you can legally resist the same way you would any other assault.

Kevin
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”