Democrats want poor people to be victims

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Post Reply
User avatar

Topic author
ClarkLZeuss
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 368
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:10 am

Democrats want poor people to be victims

#1

Post by ClarkLZeuss »

Excellent article by John Lott:
Legislation in at least 17 states around the country is aimed specifically at making it more costly to own a gun. Democrats are voting in mass against exempting the poor from fees when it comes to guns...Democrats seem to think that waiting for police to arrive from a 911 call is good enough for the poor.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/03/ ... z2NXsaQAp1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"Love always protects." (1 Corinthians 13:7)
User avatar

Dadtodabone
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1339
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:46 pm

Re: Democrats want poor people to be victims

#2

Post by Dadtodabone »

Mr. Lott takes Texas to task on handgun licensing, where none is required, and mistakes the CHL for general licensing. While I respect Mr. Lott and his research in general, this is a glaring error that undermines my confidence in him.
"Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris!"

tommyg
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 875
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2011 9:59 am
Location: Dale, TX

Re: Democrats want poor people to be victims

#3

Post by tommyg »

I read the article it spacifically said concealed handgun permits not permits to purchase.
I think the article is right only the wording is confusing :txflag:
N.R.A. benefactor Member :tiphat: Please Support the N.R.A. :patriot:
User avatar

baldeagle
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5240
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:26 pm
Location: Richardson, TX

Re: Democrats want poor people to be victims

#4

Post by baldeagle »

Dadtodabone wrote:Mr. Lott takes Texas to task on handgun licensing, where none is required, and mistakes the CHL for general licensing. While I respect Mr. Lott and his research in general, this is a glaring error that undermines my confidence in him.
You misread it. Here's what he wrote:
The impact of fees and training is no different with concealed handgun permits. Texas has four times Indiana’s population, yet it has issued only slightly more permits, 584,000 versus 450,000. The difference is not because Texans like guns less. It is simply that Texans have a more difficult time getting permits. The fee for getting a 5-year permit in Texas is $140, but only $65 in Indiana. Similarly, Texas requires 10 hours of training and Indiana doesn't require any.
He uses the word "permit" but he's referring to the Texas CHL license.

More importantly, his point is not only valid, but it is a HUGE opening for Republicans. Pointing out that the Democrats are deliberately and consciously making it more difficult for poor people to defend themselves could drive a serious wedge between Democrats and their main constituencies and open up the possibility, in the minds of the poor, that the Democrats really DON'T have their best interests at heart.
The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. James Madison
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”