Call To Action From TSRA - HB 972 & 700

[Charles L. Cotton]

Does anyone have a link to the committee substitute for HB 700? I'd like to actually read it before giving my support. I want to see how the 30.07 is written, and if they addressed the idiotic holster requirement in the original.

It's not posted until it's approved as a substitute by the Chairman which is a formality. I've read it's okay on TPC §30.06. It adds word "concealed" in one place and nothing else is changed. That change was not necessary but it is also harmless.

Chas.

[maverick2076]

Does it address the "dual points of retention" holster?

[mojo84]

I don't like the dual point of restraint requirement but that is not enough for me to not support the bill. I see it as baby steps and we can address that flaw in due time.

[Charles L. Cotton]

Does it address the "dual points of retention" holster?

Yes, that requirement was deleted in the committee substitute.

Chas.

[Wes]

[mojo84]

Does it address the "dual points of retention" holster?

Yes, that requirement was deleted in the committee substitute.

Chas.

Excellent

[Hawk99]

Emails sent.

[maverick2076]

Does it address the "dual points of retention" holster?

Yes, that requirement was deleted in the committee substitute.

Chas.

Awesome news! Can't wait to read the revised bill.

[baldeagle]

Done.

[RoyGBiv]

Thank goodness for copy and paste.

Done.!

[J.R.@A&M]

Done.

[NorthTexas]

Emails sent!