HB47: Reduction of Class Hours for Initial CHL

This sub-forum will open for posting on Sept. 1, 2012.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Do you support reducing the 10 hr. CHL course to between 4 to 6 hours, excluding range time??

I support HB47 and I am not a CHL Instructor
90
66%
I support HB47 and I am a CHL Instructor
25
18%
I oppose HB47 and I am not a CHL Instructor
20
15%
I oppose HB47 and I am a CHL Instructor
2
1%
 
Total votes: 137

User avatar

Topic author
Charles L. Cotton
Site Admin
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 17787
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX
Contact:

HB47: Reduction of Class Hours for Initial CHL

#1

Post by Charles L. Cotton »

I have published an article on http://www.TexasFirearmsCoalition.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; titled Texans Need Relief from Excessively Long CHL Courses. I want to get an idea where people stand on this issue. There hasn't been much communication with elected officials since no hearings have been set. However, a limited number of very vocal instructors are apparently contacting House Members so the only input they are receiving at this point is in opposition to HB47.

Please read the linked article, then vote in this poll, if you are interested in this subject.

Thanks,
Chas.

Ipconfig
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 91
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 2:33 pm

Re: HB47: Reduction of Class Hours for Initial CHL

#2

Post by Ipconfig »

Will there still be a range time required?
User avatar

RoyGBiv
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 9551
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:41 am
Location: Fort Worth

Re: HB47: Reduction of Class Hours for Initial CHL

#3

Post by RoyGBiv »

I've said it before and I'll say it again here... 10 hours is unnecessary.
I'd consider 4 hours a solid improvement.
I'd prefer zero mandatory hours and passing a written test on TX laws.
I'm a realist and can support the incremental change to 4-6 mandatory hours.

I worry about the cottage industry of instructors that make their livelihood (or their guns and ammo money anyway) opposing legislation that could harm them financially.
I am not a lawyer. This is NOT legal advice.!
Nothing tempers idealism quite like the cold bath of reality.... SQLGeek
User avatar

RX8er
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 1269
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 10:36 pm
Location: Northeast Fort Worth

Re: HB47: Reduction of Class Hours for Initial CHL

#4

Post by RX8er »

I know we have hashed this out before on other threads and I'm glad to see a poll. I voted non instructor in favor of.
Final Shot offers Firearms / FFL Transfers / CHL Instruction. Please like our Facebook Page.
If guns kill people, do pens misspell words?
I like options: Sig Sauer | DPMS | Springfield Armory | Glock | Beretta
User avatar

The_Busy_Mom
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 352
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 10:07 pm
Location: DFW Metro Area

Re: HB47: Reduction of Class Hours for Initial CHL

#5

Post by The_Busy_Mom »

I wish there was a button for "Instructor Applicant" who supports the bill, as that would be me. Texans are an adapting people - Instructors will find a way to keep their income while keeping classes 4-6 hours. I know I already have some ideas how I could make this work for me!

:txflag: TBM
Texas CHL Instructor / NRA Certified Instructor
Final Shot Armory - Specializing in Firearms Sales & Transfers, NFA Sales
$20 Transfers for Current TX CHL Holders, Military, Teachers, LEO / $25 Everyone else
http://www.FinalShotUS.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar

RX8er
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 1269
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 10:36 pm
Location: Northeast Fort Worth

Re: HB47: Reduction of Class Hours for Initial CHL

#6

Post by RX8er »

The_Busy_Mom wrote:I wish there was a button for "Instructor Applicant" who supports the bill, as that would be me. Texans are an adapting people - Instructors will find a way to keep their income while keeping classes 4-6 hours. I know I already have some ideas how I could make this work for me!

:txflag: TBM

This just means that you should be able to teach two classes a day instead of just one. Wooohoooo, more money!!! :crazy:
Final Shot offers Firearms / FFL Transfers / CHL Instruction. Please like our Facebook Page.
If guns kill people, do pens misspell words?
I like options: Sig Sauer | DPMS | Springfield Armory | Glock | Beretta
User avatar

GeekwithaGun
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1001
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 10:30 am
Location: Hickory Creek

Re: HB47: Reduction of Class Hours for Initial CHL

#7

Post by GeekwithaGun »

Non-Instructor in favor.

One of the reasons my wife does not want to take the CHL course is the 10 hour classroom time.

It would also seem to me that an instructor could have 2 classes in a day if they are only 4 hours long and actually double their income. Of course the instructor may or may not be able to have range portion on same day depending on location.

(RX8er beat me)
Last edited by GeekwithaGun on Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
NRA Life Member
User avatar

Gameover
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 186
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 3:34 pm
Location: Grand Prairie

Re: HB47: Reduction of Class Hours for Initial CHL

#8

Post by Gameover »

4-6 hours would be much better then 10. I think if they cut the youtube videos out of the class I took it would have fallin in that time frame. Now my question would be if you cut the time in half does the price go with it?
Question everything
User avatar

Hola Gato
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 79
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:30 pm

Re: HB47: Reduction of Class Hours for Initial CHL

#9

Post by Hola Gato »

It's a nice change but it's only a one time thing for the long class. Campus carry and open carry are both better changes worth calling my state rep and senator,
I didn't vote for Obama.
Somebody else did that.
User avatar

Topic author
Charles L. Cotton
Site Admin
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 17787
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX
Contact:

Re: HB47: Reduction of Class Hours for Initial CHL

#10

Post by Charles L. Cotton »

Ipconfig wrote:Will there still be a range time required?
Yes.

Chas.

MMac
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 11:04 pm
Location: Houston/Klein Tx

Re: HB47: Reduction of Class Hours for Initial CHL

#11

Post by MMac »

I believe a basic handgun class should be required as well. I've seen some who get a CHL and had never shot a pistol before attending the class. Just because they get a CHL they still have no idea how to handle the weapon. I worked for a while in a gun range, and I've seen it first hand.
Mac
Houston/Klein, TX
NRA Member
S&W M&P 9FS, 9c, Shield 9, 15-22
User avatar

Crossfire
Moderator
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 5404
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 10:27 am
Location: DFW
Contact:

Re: HB47: Reduction of Class Hours for Initial CHL

#12

Post by Crossfire »

In full support, and an instructor. 10 hours is too long for people to retain most of the material. Cover the important parts (Chapter 46, Chapter 9, 30.06) and cut out the fluff.
Texas LTC Instructor, FFL, IdentoGO Fingerprinting Partner
http://www.Crossfire-Training.com
User avatar

TheArmedFarmer
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 574
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 9:18 pm
Location: Grapevine

Re: HB47: Reduction of Class Hours for Initial CHL

#13

Post by TheArmedFarmer »

10 hours was a significant burden for Mrs. Armed Farmer who had a baby at the time. A 4 to 6 hour class would have been much easier. 10 hours is excessive and un-necessary. Much of the time was spent just sitting around, shooting the bull and waiting for people to get their fingerprints done and photos taken.
Life member: NRA, THSC, HSLDA.
User avatar

sjfcontrol
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Flint, TX

Re: HB47: Reduction of Class Hours for Initial CHL

#14

Post by sjfcontrol »

Crossfire wrote:In full support, and an instructor. 10 hours is too long for people to retain most of the material. Cover the important parts (Chapter 46, Chapter 9, 30.06) and cut out the fluff.
Um, feel free to correct me, but its my understanding that the required subject matter would not change. So we'd still have to do NVDR, and all the other subjects. Right?
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget. Image
User avatar

Crossfire
Moderator
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 5404
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 10:27 am
Location: DFW
Contact:

Re: HB47: Reduction of Class Hours for Initial CHL

#15

Post by Crossfire »

sjfcontrol wrote:
Crossfire wrote:In full support, and an instructor. 10 hours is too long for people to retain most of the material. Cover the important parts (Chapter 46, Chapter 9, 30.06) and cut out the fluff.
Um, feel free to correct me, but its my understanding that the required subject matter would not change. So we'd still have to do NVDR, and all the other subjects. Right?
Right? Geees, I hope not! But, don't know at this point.
Texas LTC Instructor, FFL, IdentoGO Fingerprinting Partner
http://www.Crossfire-Training.com
Post Reply

Return to “2013 Texas Legislative Session”