Feinstein AWB bans all Glocks?
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 5776
- Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 5:01 pm
- Location: Austin area
Feinstein AWB bans all Glocks?
This guy says an obscure portion of DiFi's AWB could be construed to ban all Glocks
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
posting from phone do can't embed video
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
posting from phone do can't embed video
Re: Feinstein AWB bans all Glocks?
As I understood it, it bans all guns "capable" of using a magazine over 10 rounds.
That includes all 1911s too
1911 .45 Acp 15 - Rd. Mag
and really, all guns which accept magazines
That includes all 1911s too
1911 .45 Acp 15 - Rd. Mag
and really, all guns which accept magazines
I'm no lawyer
"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
-
- Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 9:47 pm
- Location: Euless, TX
- Contact:
Re: Feinstein AWB bans all Glocks?
I think we'll find that it bans anything with a "grip". Page 13, IIRC.
35 days...mailbox to mailbox
Re: Feinstein AWB bans all Glocks?
Okay. Which one is crazier? DiFI or that other one that thought Guam might tip over if we put too much stuff on it?
I am not and have never been a LEO. My avatar is in honor of my friend, Dallas Police Sargent Michael Smith, who was murdered along with four other officers in Dallas on 7.7.2016.
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 895
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 11:18 am
- Location: Friendswood, Texas
Re: Feinstein AWB bans all Glocks?
Those islands "flip over" all the time.C-dub wrote:Okay. Which one is crazier? DiFI or that other one that thought Guam might tip over if we put too much stuff on it?
"Character is doing the right thing, even when nobody is looking" - J.C. watts Jr.
CHL since Jan. 2013
53 days mailbox to mailbox.
CHL since Jan. 2013
53 days mailbox to mailbox.
-
- Moderator
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 6458
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 4:50 pm
- Location: Outskirts of Houston
Re: Feinstein AWB bans all Glocks?
Actually no, they don't.Wodathunkit wrote:Those islands "flip over" all the time.C-dub wrote:Okay. Which one is crazier? DiFI or that other one that thought Guam might tip over if we put too much stuff on it?
I grew up in Southeast Asia. Went to high school there.
Been to Guam at least a half-dozen times.
Lived in the Philippines for seven years.
Guam is not going to tip over and sink into the ocean.
Join the NRA or upgrade your membership today. Support the Texas Firearms Coalition and subscribe to the Podcast.
I’ve contacted my State Rep, Gary Elkins, about co-sponsoring HB560. Have you contacted your Rep?
NRA Benefactor Life Member
I’ve contacted my State Rep, Gary Elkins, about co-sponsoring HB560. Have you contacted your Rep?
NRA Benefactor Life Member
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 5298
- Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:27 pm
- Location: Luling, TX
Re: Feinstein AWB bans all Glocks?
Well, it won't if we don't put too many sailors on it. If we were to overload it, you could never tell what would happen.Skiprr wrote:Guam is not going to tip over and sink into the ocean.
Steve Rothstein
Re: Feinstein AWB bans all Glocks?
Fortunately, you are mistaken in saying that Feinstein's bill, S.150, would ban all firearms capable of using a magazine over 10 rds. The bill specifically exempts by name various arms capable of using mags of greater than 10 rds. Among these specified exemptions are versions of the Mini 14, Mini Thirty, and M1 Carbine that have a fixed stock. What the bill actually proposes is bad enough without us claiming it says things that it does not.
Here's the text of the bill: http://www.feinstein.senate.gov/public/ ... e69f517fb4" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 5110
- Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 12:00 pm
- Location: North Texas
Re: Feinstein AWB bans all Glocks?
Bottom line is that it is not going to ban anything. It is NOT going to pass in the Senate or the House!
Alan - ANYTHING I write is MY OPINION only.
Certified Curmudgeon - But, my German Shepherd loves me!
NRA-Life, USN '65-'69 & '73-'79: RM1
1911's RULE!
Certified Curmudgeon - But, my German Shepherd loves me!
NRA-Life, USN '65-'69 & '73-'79: RM1
1911's RULE!
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 1352
- Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2009 3:23 am
- Location: North Texas
Re: Feinstein AWB bans all Glocks?
Pfft, someone has never sat the wrong way on an inner tube...srothstein wrote:Well, it won't if we don't put too many sailors on it. If we were to overload it, you could never tell what would happen.Skiprr wrote:Guam is not going to tip over and sink into the ocean.
Amazing how those lava rocks are light enough that they'll keep that entire island floating! When did they tether Guam in that area? It was around WWI, right?
“Beware the fury of a patient man.” - John Dryden
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 3166
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:39 am
- Location: Bay Area, CA
Re: Feinstein AWB bans all Glocks?
Right afterwards, yeah.MadMonkey wrote:Pfft, someone has never sat the wrong way on an inner tube...srothstein wrote:Well, it won't if we don't put too many sailors on it. If we were to overload it, you could never tell what would happen.Skiprr wrote:Guam is not going to tip over and sink into the ocean.
Amazing how those lava rocks are light enough that they'll keep that entire island floating! When did they tether Guam in that area? It was around WWI, right?
I am not a lawyer, nor have I played one on TV, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, nor should anything I say be taken as legal advice. If it is important that any information be accurate, do not use me as the only source.
Re: Feinstein AWB bans all Glocks?
I believe that you are almost certainly correct. The chair of the committee with jurisdiction over the bill, Sen. Patrick Leahy of VT, has indicated that he might not even vote to send the bill to the floor and is not confident it will make it out of committee. The Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid, voted against the 1994 ban, and hasn't committed to allowing it to come to a vote on the floor even if it gets out of committee. Reid can count and knows there probably aren't enough votes in the Senate for passage. If the bill comes to the floor in the Senate it will put many red/purple state Dem senators in a lose-lose situation. If they vote for the bill, they anger their constituents; if they don't, they anger the base of the Dem party. And the bill's chances in the House are even worse.AEA wrote:Bottom line is that it is not going to ban anything. It is NOT going to pass in the Senate or the House!
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 260
- Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 7:53 am
- Location: austex
Re: Feinstein AWB bans all Glocks?
How about instead of banning firearms and magazine clips and barrel shrouds and mufflers we ban all the people that think the world is full of unicorns and Care Bears from seeking public office and/or speaking on network news/television of any sort...
You keep your ideas in your own fantasyland and ill keep my glock 1911 and Evil Black Rifle
You keep your ideas in your own fantasyland and ill keep my glock 1911 and Evil Black Rifle
Chl class for me and wife=$225. Chl application fees =$280. Chl gear for 2=more $ the previous. Moving from sheep to sheepdog = priceless
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 26852
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
- Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
- Contact:
Re: Feinstein AWB bans all Glocks?
All candidates could be easily screened by asking them one simple question that has a one word answer. The ones that answer it correctly would likely be qualified on all counts:
"Do you believe that government can create wealth?"
Those that answer "Yes" can go get themselves a job as a dog robber. Those that answer "No" can get their names on the ballot.
"Do you believe that government can create wealth?"
Those that answer "Yes" can go get themselves a job as a dog robber. Those that answer "No" can get their names on the ballot.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”
― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"
#TINVOWOOT
― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"
#TINVOWOOT
-
- Banned
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 5:47 am
- Location: San Leon Texas
Re: Feinstein AWB bans all Glocks?
Tam your being unfair to dog robbers, they are good people.