Feinstein AWB bans all Glocks?

What's going on in Washington, D.C.?

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Post Reply
User avatar

Topic author
A-R
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5776
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 5:01 pm
Location: Austin area

Feinstein AWB bans all Glocks?

#1

Post by A-R »

This guy says an obscure portion of DiFi's AWB could be construed to ban all Glocks

" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

posting from phone do can't embed video

RPB
Banned
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 8697
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Feinstein AWB bans all Glocks?

#2

Post by RPB »

As I understood it, it bans all guns "capable" of using a magazine over 10 rounds.
That includes all 1911s too

1911 .45 Acp 15 - Rd. Mag

Image

and really, all guns which accept magazines
Image
I'm no lawyer

"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
User avatar

Choctaw
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 67
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 9:47 pm
Location: Euless, TX
Contact:

Re: Feinstein AWB bans all Glocks?

#3

Post by Choctaw »

I think we'll find that it bans anything with a "grip". Page 13, IIRC.
35 days...mailbox to mailbox
User avatar

C-dub
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 13562
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Feinstein AWB bans all Glocks?

#4

Post by C-dub »

Okay. Which one is crazier? DiFI or that other one that thought Guam might tip over if we put too much stuff on it?
I am not and have never been a LEO. My avatar is in honor of my friend, Dallas Police Sargent Michael Smith, who was murdered along with four other officers in Dallas on 7.7.2016.
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider
User avatar

Wodathunkit
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 895
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 11:18 am
Location: Friendswood, Texas

Re: Feinstein AWB bans all Glocks?

#5

Post by Wodathunkit »

C-dub wrote:Okay. Which one is crazier? DiFI or that other one that thought Guam might tip over if we put too much stuff on it?
Those islands "flip over" all the time. :biggrinjester:
"Character is doing the right thing, even when nobody is looking" - J.C. watts Jr.
CHL since Jan. 2013
53 days mailbox to mailbox.
User avatar

Skiprr
Moderator
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 6458
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 4:50 pm
Location: Outskirts of Houston

Re: Feinstein AWB bans all Glocks?

#6

Post by Skiprr »

Wodathunkit wrote:
C-dub wrote:Okay. Which one is crazier? DiFI or that other one that thought Guam might tip over if we put too much stuff on it?
Those islands "flip over" all the time. :biggrinjester:
Actually no, they don't.

I grew up in Southeast Asia. Went to high school there.

Been to Guam at least a half-dozen times.

Lived in the Philippines for seven years.

Guam is not going to tip over and sink into the ocean.
Join the NRA or upgrade your membership today. Support the Texas Firearms Coalition and subscribe to the Podcast.
I’ve contacted my State Rep, Gary Elkins, about co-sponsoring HB560. Have you contacted your Rep?
NRA Benefactor Life Member

srothstein
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5298
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:27 pm
Location: Luling, TX

Re: Feinstein AWB bans all Glocks?

#7

Post by srothstein »

Skiprr wrote:Guam is not going to tip over and sink into the ocean.
Well, it won't if we don't put too many sailors on it. If we were to overload it, you could never tell what would happen.
Steve Rothstein

oldtexan

Re: Feinstein AWB bans all Glocks?

#8

Post by oldtexan »

RPB wrote:As I understood it, it bans all guns "capable" of using a magazine over 10 rounds.
That includes all 1911s too

1911 .45 Acp 15 - Rd. Mag

[ Image ]

and really, all guns which accept magazines
[ Image ]
Fortunately, you are mistaken in saying that Feinstein's bill, S.150, would ban all firearms capable of using a magazine over 10 rds. The bill specifically exempts by name various arms capable of using mags of greater than 10 rds. Among these specified exemptions are versions of the Mini 14, Mini Thirty, and M1 Carbine that have a fixed stock. What the bill actually proposes is bad enough without us claiming it says things that it does not.

Here's the text of the bill: http://www.feinstein.senate.gov/public/ ... e69f517fb4" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar

AEA
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5110
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 12:00 pm
Location: North Texas

Re: Feinstein AWB bans all Glocks?

#9

Post by AEA »

Bottom line is that it is not going to ban anything. It is NOT going to pass in the Senate or the House! :tiphat:
Alan - ANYTHING I write is MY OPINION only.
Certified Curmudgeon - But, my German Shepherd loves me!
NRA-Life, USN '65-'69 & '73-'79: RM1
1911's RULE!
User avatar

MadMonkey
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1352
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2009 3:23 am
Location: North Texas

Re: Feinstein AWB bans all Glocks?

#10

Post by MadMonkey »

srothstein wrote:
Skiprr wrote:Guam is not going to tip over and sink into the ocean.
Well, it won't if we don't put too many sailors on it. If we were to overload it, you could never tell what would happen.
Pfft, someone has never sat the wrong way on an inner tube...

Amazing how those lava rocks are light enough that they'll keep that entire island floating! When did they tether Guam in that area? It was around WWI, right?
“Beware the fury of a patient man.” - John Dryden

Dave2
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3166
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:39 am
Location: Bay Area, CA

Re: Feinstein AWB bans all Glocks?

#11

Post by Dave2 »

MadMonkey wrote:
srothstein wrote:
Skiprr wrote:Guam is not going to tip over and sink into the ocean.
Well, it won't if we don't put too many sailors on it. If we were to overload it, you could never tell what would happen.
Pfft, someone has never sat the wrong way on an inner tube...

Amazing how those lava rocks are light enough that they'll keep that entire island floating! When did they tether Guam in that area? It was around WWI, right?
Right afterwards, yeah.
:leaving
I am not a lawyer, nor have I played one on TV, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, nor should anything I say be taken as legal advice. If it is important that any information be accurate, do not use me as the only source.

oldtexan

Re: Feinstein AWB bans all Glocks?

#12

Post by oldtexan »

AEA wrote:Bottom line is that it is not going to ban anything. It is NOT going to pass in the Senate or the House! :tiphat:
I believe that you are almost certainly correct. The chair of the committee with jurisdiction over the bill, Sen. Patrick Leahy of VT, has indicated that he might not even vote to send the bill to the floor and is not confident it will make it out of committee. The Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid, voted against the 1994 ban, and hasn't committed to allowing it to come to a vote on the floor even if it gets out of committee. Reid can count and knows there probably aren't enough votes in the Senate for passage. If the bill comes to the floor in the Senate it will put many red/purple state Dem senators in a lose-lose situation. If they vote for the bill, they anger their constituents; if they don't, they anger the base of the Dem party. And the bill's chances in the House are even worse.

packa45
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 260
Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 7:53 am
Location: austex

Re: Feinstein AWB bans all Glocks?

#13

Post by packa45 »

How about instead of banning firearms and magazine clips and barrel shrouds and mufflers we ban all the people that think the world is full of unicorns and Care Bears from seeking public office and/or speaking on network news/television of any sort...

You keep your ideas in your own fantasyland and ill keep my glock 1911 and Evil Black Rifle
Chl class for me and wife=$225. Chl application fees =$280. Chl gear for 2=more $ the previous. Moving from sheep to sheepdog = priceless
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 26852
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Feinstein AWB bans all Glocks?

#14

Post by The Annoyed Man »

All candidates could be easily screened by asking them one simple question that has a one word answer. The ones that answer it correctly would likely be qualified on all counts:

"Do you believe that government can create wealth?"

Those that answer "Yes" can go get themselves a job as a dog robber. Those that answer "No" can get their names on the ballot.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT

JP171
Banned
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1406
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 5:47 am
Location: San Leon Texas

Re: Feinstein AWB bans all Glocks?

#15

Post by JP171 »

Tam your being unfair to dog robbers, they are good people.
Post Reply

Return to “Federal”