Mandatory Gun Insurance

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

Topic author
RoyGBiv
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 9579
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:41 am
Location: Fort Worth

Mandatory Gun Insurance

#1

Post by RoyGBiv »

Yet another battlefront....

Honestly folks, if you've not yet joined the NRA, what are you waiting for?

http://m.apnews.com/ap/db_268743/conten ... d=uHtEbe01" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
BOSTON (AP) - As lawmakers cast around for ways to curb gun-related violence, some are hoping the insurance market might offer incentives.

A bill filed Friday in Massachusetts would require gun owners to purchase liability insurance in the event that a firearm is used to injure.

The insurance policies would give those injured by a weapon a legal recourse, backers of the bill say, but they also would create financial incentives that could reduce accidents and fatalities. Gun owners, for example, might see lower insurance rates if they agreed to take firearms training courses and properly stored their weapons.

"Insurance companies were able to discourage smoking through the marketplace and make cars safer through the marketplace," said state Rep. David Linsky, the bill's sponsor.

<snip>

"It's time that we think about alternative ways that we can effectively deal with gun violence," the Massachusetts Democrat said. "We need better research. We need better understanding. We need to try different approaches to protect our children."
And just as a reminder.....
"The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation. " -Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler, Publ. Houghton Miflin, 1943, Page 403
I am not a lawyer. This is NOT legal advice.!
Nothing tempers idealism quite like the cold bath of reality.... SQLGeek

Andrew

Re: Mandatory Gun Insurance

#2

Post by Andrew »

Would be considered an infringement, the same as a poll tax?
User avatar

Superman
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 309
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 6:44 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Mandatory Gun Insurance

#3

Post by Superman »

RoyGBiv wrote: And just as a reminder.....
"The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation. " -Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler, Publ. Houghton Miflin, 1943, Page 403
Can we please resolve to do a little more leg work on researching sensationalist quotes like this? It only gives fuel to the libs to call us out on how ignorant we are. Hitler did not say that quote and I'm pretty sure you won't find it in the publication you sited. Hitler did write the first sentence of that quote:
The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people.
But the rest of it came from an imaginary letter written by Rabbi Daniel Lapin in 2004 about what Hitler "would have written" if he were alive to write it in the present day:

Instructive Link :biggrinjester:

Direct Link

We have to set our bar higher so that we are above reproach. :txflag:

RPB
Banned
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 8697
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Mandatory Gun Insurance

#4

Post by RPB »

Well ... you got paperwork sayin' I own a gun so I MUST buy insurance? :txflag: ...Well ...all my guns fell out of my boat ...

You think I'll create paperwork, a database of what I own, available to a government, by listing them with an Insurer? wait a minute while I ...
:smilelol5: :smilelol5: "rlol" "rlol" "rlol" :smilelol5: :smilelol5: :smilelol5: "rlol" "rlol" "rlol" :smilelol5: :smilelol5: "rlol" "rlol" "rlol"

ok, here's the serial number

Image
I'm no lawyer

"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
User avatar

JALLEN
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 3081
Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 4:11 pm
Location: Comal County

Re: Mandatory Gun Insurance

#5

Post by JALLEN »

That just shows how stupid these lawmakers are. Didn't any of them go to Harvard Law Shool right there in the back yard?

Nobody is going to write insurance that covers you against your intentional acts. Liability insurance is for damages inflicted on others due to negligent acts or omissions.

So, if you negligently used a gun, an "ND" to be precise, you'd be covered. But if you hauled out Old Smokey and blasted someone on purpose, no coverage.

Hey, wait a minute! Is this some sneaky trick to get people to send money to insurance companies for no coverage at all?
Luckily, I have enough willpower to control the driving ambition that rages within me.
User avatar

Zoo
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 135
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 8:47 pm

Re: Mandatory Gun Insurance

#6

Post by Zoo »

JALLEN wrote:Hey, wait a minute! Is this some sneaky trick to get people to send money to insurance companies for no coverage at all?
Well, it is Massachusetts. Just look how they inspired Obamacare.
The city is not a concrete jungle. It is a human zoo.
User avatar

JJVP
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2093
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 4:34 pm
Location: League City, TX

Re: Mandatory Gun Insurance

#7

Post by JJVP »

The insurance policies would give those injured by a weapon a legal recourse, backers of the bill say, but they also would create financial incentives that could reduce accidents and fatalities.
So now the BG's can get money from the insurance company if you shoot them. Brilliant. "rlol"
2nd Amendment. America's Original Homeland Security.
Alcohol, Tobacco , Firearms. Who's Bringing the Chips?
No Guns. No Freedom. Know Guns. Know Freedom.
User avatar

JALLEN
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 3081
Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 4:11 pm
Location: Comal County

Re: Mandatory Gun Insurance

#8

Post by JALLEN »

JJVP wrote:
The insurance policies would give those injured by a weapon a legal recourse, backers of the bill say, but they also would create financial incentives that could reduce accidents and fatalities.
So now the BG's can get money from the insurance company if you shoot them. Brilliant. "rlol"
This is ridiculous. If you shoot someone without justification, you have legal remedies, battery to start with, if it is malicious, then perhaps punitive damages. Insurance companies will cover not one dime of that, unless it is clearly negligent, and no punitive damages unless it was grossly so and then some.

If you hit someone with your car, it is probably carelessness, etc. but if you intentionally ram someone, the insurance company isn't involved. Liability insurance excludes intentional conduct.

Fire insurance excludes arson, deliberately setting your house on fire.

Is the BG going to claim that the shooter carelessly thought he was a BG, but really he was just turning his life around? :smilelol5:
Luckily, I have enough willpower to control the driving ambition that rages within me.
User avatar

Topic author
RoyGBiv
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 9579
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:41 am
Location: Fort Worth

Re: Mandatory Gun Insurance

#9

Post by RoyGBiv »

Superman wrote: Instructive Link :biggrinjester:

Direct Link

We have to set our bar higher so that we are above reproach. :txflag:
I definitely DID check..
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Quote_from_me ... e_children" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Sometimes the internets are wrong..

Mea Culpa.
I am not a lawyer. This is NOT legal advice.!
Nothing tempers idealism quite like the cold bath of reality.... SQLGeek
User avatar

Jumping Frog
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5488
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:13 am
Location: Klein, TX (Houston NW suburb)

Re: Mandatory Gun Insurance

#10

Post by Jumping Frog »

JALLEN wrote:Liability insurance excludes intentional conduct.
True.

However, acting in self defense isn't an intentional tort. The other party's actions were intentional, the insured's actions were simply a legal response to their actions.
-Just call me Bob . . . Texas Firearms Coalition, NRA Life member, TSRA Life member, and OFCC Patron member

This froggie ain't boiling! Shall not be infringed! Μολών Λαβέ

oldtexan

Re: Mandatory Gun Insurance

#11

Post by oldtexan »

Superman wrote:
RoyGBiv wrote: And just as a reminder.....
"The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation. " -Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler, Publ. Houghton Miflin, 1943, Page 403
Can we please resolve to do a little more leg work on researching sensationalist quotes like this? It only gives fuel to the libs to call us out on how ignorant we are. Hitler did not say that quote and I'm pretty sure you won't find it in the publication you sited. Hitler did write the first sentence of that quote:
The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people.
But the rest of it came from an imaginary letter written by Rabbi Daniel Lapin in 2004 about what Hitler "would have written" if he were alive to write it in the present day:

Instructive Link :biggrinjester:

Direct Link

We have to set our bar higher so that we are above reproach. :txflag:
Superman, thanks for posting this.

Daisy Cutter
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 50
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 3:23 pm

Re: Mandatory Gun Insurance

#12

Post by Daisy Cutter »

An insurance requirement might actually backfire on the anti-gunners, since the actuaries would discover that guns owned by law-abiding citizens are very rarely used in actual injury shootings, and the premium would be so small as to almost not warrant the effort. And criminals would not bother to get the insurance anyway. And the know-nothing reporters would never ask "Did the (criminal) shooter have the mandatory insurance?"

Contrast my vehicle's liability insurance portion, which is only about $120 a year for $250,000 bodily injury, and this is covering me and my 3000 lb machine (the truck) in which I hurtle down freeways every day while juggling coffee cup, cellphone, steering wheel, notepad, and stickshift, dicing with big rigs, grannies going a careful 45 mph, casual lane-changers, not to mention my fellow cellphone chatterers.

RPB
Banned
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 8697
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Mandatory Gun Insurance

#13

Post by RPB »

California Proposes Gun Liability Insurance Mandate
http://conservativeread.com/california- ... ROwA2eC9X0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
If they can’t completely ban guns, at least they can try to “price gun-owners out of existence,” as Sam Peredes of Gun Owners of California put it. California Democrats are trying to force gun-owners to purchase liability
insurance to cover damages or injuries incurred by their firearms, kind of like car insurance. Part of the legislation would give gun-owners lower insurance rates if they keep their guns locked away in a safe at all times. An NBC affiliate in San Diego reported on the Democrat legislators’ stated motives for their bill:
Would my fire insurance rates be lower if I keep my fire extinguisher locked away in a safe?
I'm no lawyer

"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
User avatar

LSUTiger
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1169
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 2:36 pm

Re: Mandatory Gun Insurance

#14

Post by LSUTiger »

I am sure they would want you to list all your guns and serial numbers. Its just another form of registration.
Chance favors the prepared. Making good people helpless doesn't make bad people harmless.
There is no safety in denial. When seconds count the Police are only minutes away.
Sometimes I really wish a lawyer would chime in and clear things up. Do we have any lawyers on this forum?
User avatar

Beiruty
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 9655
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 9:22 pm
Location: Allen, Texas

Re: Mandatory Gun Insurance

#15

Post by Beiruty »

How about forcing criminals to have criminal liability insurance? A minimum of $100,000 for property crime and $10,000,000 for bodily harm crimes? :smilelol5: :smilelol5: :smilelol5: :smilelol5:
:roll: :roll: :roll:
Beiruty,
United we stand, dispersed we falter
2014: NRA Endowment lifetime member
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”