Background checks looking like the "compromise"

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

Topic author
A-R
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 5776
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 5:01 pm
Location: Austin area

Background checks looking like the "compromise"

#1

Post by A-R »

Some news sites this morning are reporting that NRA President has "accepted" background checks
http://news.yahoo.com/nra-chief-says-gr ... itics.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Not quite what he said, see full interview here (starting roughly between 1:30 and 2:00
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505263_162- ... wont-work/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I am getting the sense that an end to private sales is the "compromise" all gun owners/buyers will force forced to accept.

I for one DO NOT accept this (I used to believe in this until I started thinking through the ramifications of this - the so-called "long game" of gun control).
User avatar

carlson1
Moderator
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 11822
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 1:11 am

Re: Background checks looking like the "compromise"

#2

Post by carlson1 »

If we loose the right for individual sales it is just another piece of our 2A rights taken away. They will continue to chip away at them to eventually they are gone completely.
Image
User avatar

mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 9045
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: Background checks looking like the "compromise"

#3

Post by mojo84 »

I wonder of the FFLs support this as it will drive business their way.
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.

Rabert
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2013 10:06 am

Re: Background checks looking like the "compromise"

#4

Post by Rabert »

I don't really have a problem with national database background checks for new gun sales. There's no reason why it shouldn't be as quick as our current background check. However if they make you wait several days ... that's a big problem and there's no reason for it either. But Obama is trying to make it mandatory for ALL sales - even private ones? That little demand may not pass the Constitutional test.
User avatar

anygunanywhere
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 9
Posts: 7877
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
Location: Richmond, Texas

Re: Background checks looking like the "compromise"

#5

Post by anygunanywhere »

No compromise.

When private sales are outlawed, I will become an outlaw.

Anygunanywhere
"When democracy turns to tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote." Mike Vanderboegh

"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand
User avatar

nitrogen
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2322
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 1:15 pm
Location: Sachse, TX
Contact:

Re: Background checks looking like the "compromise"

#6

Post by nitrogen »

If the NRA gives up on this, i'll have wasted money on a life membership.
.השואה... לעולם לא עוד
Holocaust... Never Again.
Some people create their own storms and get upset when it rains.
--anonymous
User avatar

Beiruty
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 9655
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 9:22 pm
Location: Allen, Texas

Re: Background checks looking like the "compromise"

#7

Post by Beiruty »

nitrogen wrote:If the NRA gives up on this, i'll have wasted money on a life membership.
NRA asked BATF to provide a booth for gun-checkout after background checks at gun shows, and the BTAF said we are not interested :shock: :shock:

If the compromise is only limited to gun-shows and not friend to friend private sale or family to family transfer, then I can live with that.

BTW how the Feds are going to enforce background checks on private sale/transfer?!!!
Beiruty,
United we stand, dispersed we falter
2014: NRA Endowment lifetime member

RottenApple
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1772
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 3:19 pm

Re: Background checks looking like the "compromise"

#8

Post by RottenApple »

anygunanywhere wrote:No compromise.

When private sales are outlawed, I will become an outlaw.

Anygunanywhere
:iagree:

knotquiteawake
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 772
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 9:18 am
Location: Rowlett, TX

Re: Background checks looking like the "compromise"

#9

Post by knotquiteawake »

Beiruty wrote:
BTW how the Feds are going to enforce background checks on private sale/transfer?!!!
Exactly.

The only way would be to have a requirement of paperwork for every gun, i.e. registry which we know won't fly.
User avatar

SQLGeek
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3269
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 1:48 am
Location: Richmond, TX

Re: Background checks looking like the "compromise"

#10

Post by SQLGeek »

Fine. They get private party background checks. In exchange I want the Huges Amendment repealed and sound suppressors deregulated. That's compromise.
Psalm 91:2
User avatar

Wes
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 885
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 6:02 pm
Location: Ft Worth
Contact:

Re: Background checks looking like the "compromise"

#11

Post by Wes »

All he is saying is they support the nics system, and think the mental health aspect of it should be improved. He is careful with his words IMO and does not say they support personal sale checks, just that they would like to see the proposal of how they would enforce it. I'm not against that system for commercial sales but my right to sell private property should vener be required to go through it. I have seen no where the NRA has said they think otherwise. Even when he says they suggested a booth he doesn't say they recommend all sales go through it. I see it more as a recommendation to give people the option. I know I would appreciate the option at a gun show as I personally would not sell to someone without a chl at one. That's my choice though, I am free to make that choice. No one should shove that choice down my throat. If there was an ffl transfer only booth at the show I might use it, might not. Again, give me the choice, don't force me. Forcing this could definitely be a stepping stone to a registry.
Alliance Arsenal - Firearms and transfers in north Ft. Worth
User avatar

Topic author
A-R
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 5776
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 5:01 pm
Location: Austin area

Re: Background checks looking like the "compromise"

#12

Post by A-R »

Beiruty wrote:BTW how the Feds are going to enforce background checks on private sale/transfer?!!!
Later, when they've passed another law giving them permission to check on your guns - you know, to make sure they're stored safely ... for the kids you know - they'll check that each gun you have was in fact "released" to you via the NICS ... if you own a gun that doesn't have a prior NICS hit, then obviously your obtained it illegally, bypassing the background check system. Here are your new bracelets ... we'll take ALL of your guns now, you won't "need" them where you're going

wdeaver
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:09 pm
Location: Denton County

Re: Background checks looking like the "compromise"

#13

Post by wdeaver »

A free man should not have to get a permission slip from Uncle Sam before privately transferring a firearm to his son, or selling one to his friend. They say politics is all about compromise. That's the reason we need to elect statesmen instead of politicians.

Redneck_Buddha
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1566
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 4:35 pm
Location: Little Elm, TX

Re: Background checks looking like the "compromise"

#14

Post by Redneck_Buddha »

What about inherited firearms? Ones inherited that are also antique and collectable?

Dave2
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 3166
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:39 am
Location: Bay Area, CA

Re: Background checks looking like the "compromise"

#15

Post by Dave2 »

A-R wrote:
Beiruty wrote:BTW how the Feds are going to enforce background checks on private sale/transfer?!!!
Later, when they've passed another law giving them permission to check on your guns - you know, to make sure they're stored safely ... for the kids you know - they'll check that each gun you have was in fact "released" to you via the NICS ... if you own a gun that doesn't have a prior NICS hit, then obviously your obtained it illegally, bypassing the background check system. Here are your new bracelets ... we'll take ALL of your guns now, you won't "need" them where you're going
I bought that gun before FTF became illegal (and, at least so far, that would be the truth for me).
I am not a lawyer, nor have I played one on TV, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, nor should anything I say be taken as legal advice. If it is important that any information be accurate, do not use me as the only source.
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”