Refer to folks with CHL as Peacekeepers
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Refer to folks with CHL as Peacekeepers
I would like to see all folks that hold a Concealed Handgun License refered to as a "Peacekeeper". We help maintain the peace. The name helps generate trust with the public instead of suspicion of lawlessness.
What do you think?
Fireball
What do you think?
Fireball
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 4331
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 6:40 pm
- Location: DFW area
- Contact:
Re: Refer to folks with CHL as Peacekeepers
Interesting and I see where you are coming from. However, I am NOT a peacekeeper. The primary purpose for my CHL is the protection of my family and myself.fireball wrote:I would like to see all folks that hold a Concealed Handgun License refered to as a "Peacekeeper". We help maintain the peace. The name helps generate trust with the public instead of suspicion of lawlessness.
What do you think?
Fireball
I do not intervene in arguments between other people, disturbances, disorderly persons, etc, etc, etc.
*CHL Instructor*
"Speed is Fine, but accuracy is final"- Bill Jordan
Remember those who died, remember those who killed them.
"Speed is Fine, but accuracy is final"- Bill Jordan
Remember those who died, remember those who killed them.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 917
- Joined: Tue May 09, 2006 9:12 am
- Location: The part of Texas that isn't like Texas
-
- Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 9:15 pm
- Location: Friendswood, Texas
I understand that we're not cops, and shouldn't be looking to intervene. I think the point fireball was trying to make was the importance of semantics.
I admit to getting a little steamed reading a Houston Chronicle editorial yesterday that ranted about the VT shootings. It kept repeating the mantra that the only purpose of hand guns was to kill people, and therefore only police and military should be allowed to have them. I felt like asking if the police were like 007, with a "license to kill." Actually we know that they aren't for killing, they're for protection.
I think the next time I hear someone say that, I'll answer that a hand gun isn't a killing machine, it's a tool for "conflict resolution."
Scott
I admit to getting a little steamed reading a Houston Chronicle editorial yesterday that ranted about the VT shootings. It kept repeating the mantra that the only purpose of hand guns was to kill people, and therefore only police and military should be allowed to have them. I felt like asking if the police were like 007, with a "license to kill." Actually we know that they aren't for killing, they're for protection.
I think the next time I hear someone say that, I'll answer that a hand gun isn't a killing machine, it's a tool for "conflict resolution."
Scott
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 1507
- Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:11 pm
- Location: North Texas
quote
Last edited by ScubaSigGuy on Thu Apr 19, 2007 12:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
S.S.G.
"A champion doesn’t become a champion in the ring. He is merely recognized in the ring.The ‘becoming’ happens during his daily routine." Joe Louis
NRA MEMBER
"A champion doesn’t become a champion in the ring. He is merely recognized in the ring.The ‘becoming’ happens during his daily routine." Joe Louis
NRA MEMBER
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 7590
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 11:17 pm
- Location: 77504
I'm not really surprised the Houston Comical's position on Monday's incident...So I yawn rather profusely...
As for the originator of this thread, I'm in the boat with "Txi" on this one...
Priority One: myself and family...
Secondary Priority:
If the situation dictates, and I can reasonably assume deadly force is necessary to stop an attack, or an attack in progress, then yes, that would come into play, but only at that time...The odds of getting involved in something like that are pretty slim anyway...
As for the originator of this thread, I'm in the boat with "Txi" on this one...
Priority One: myself and family...
Secondary Priority:
If the situation dictates, and I can reasonably assume deadly force is necessary to stop an attack, or an attack in progress, then yes, that would come into play, but only at that time...The odds of getting involved in something like that are pretty slim anyway...
"Perseverance and Preparedness triumph over Procrastination and Paranoia every time.” -- Steve
NRA - Life Member
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
Μολών λαβέ!
NRA - Life Member
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
Μολών λαβέ!
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 591
- Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:02 pm
- Location: NW of Houston
No peacekeeper here either. I'm leaving that to the professionals.
I signed up to protect me and mine. If everybody would do that, I think we would all be fine.
Dial 911, is for people who don't want to be bothered with taking care of themselves.
Sorry if I'm a little harsh today, but I've heard just a little too much whining recently(not here).................OE
I signed up to protect me and mine. If everybody would do that, I think we would all be fine.
Dial 911, is for people who don't want to be bothered with taking care of themselves.
Sorry if I'm a little harsh today, but I've heard just a little too much whining recently(not here).................OE
NRA
TSRA
JPFO
American Legion
USN (69-77)
What did you expect?
TSRA
JPFO
American Legion
USN (69-77)
What did you expect?
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 3374
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 7:54 pm
- Location: DFW, TX
- Contact:
CHL = Law Abiding Citizen, exercising their rights. The term "peacekeeper" implies an assigned responsibility. No thanks.
I am scared of empty guns and keep mine loaded at all times. The family knows the guns are loaded and treats them with respect. Loaded guns cause few accidents; empty guns kill people every year. -Elmer Keith. 1961
Greetings--
I, also, do not think of myself as a "peacekeeper". That implies a responsibility, a duty if you will, that I am not willing to accept. My purpose for obtaining my CHL, carrying, and obtaining training is for the protection of myself and my family.
Perhaps if one wants to create a label, the term "deterrent" would be more accurate.
As I'm sure we all have, I question myself as to what would I do in a situation that could cause me to take action for the safety of those (non-family) around me. I would hope that my wits and training would cause me to react in a manner that would provide 1) for my safety, then 2) take action to stop the threat if possible without violating # 1 !
I, also, do not think of myself as a "peacekeeper". That implies a responsibility, a duty if you will, that I am not willing to accept. My purpose for obtaining my CHL, carrying, and obtaining training is for the protection of myself and my family.
Perhaps if one wants to create a label, the term "deterrent" would be more accurate.
As I'm sure we all have, I question myself as to what would I do in a situation that could cause me to take action for the safety of those (non-family) around me. I would hope that my wits and training would cause me to react in a manner that would provide 1) for my safety, then 2) take action to stop the threat if possible without violating # 1 !
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 4331
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 6:40 pm
- Location: DFW area
- Contact:
No, a fireaarm is a tool to defend yourself from a deadly assault, not to resolve conflict.Scott Murray wrote: I think the next time I hear someone say that, I'll answer that a hand gun isn't a killing machine, it's a tool for "conflict resolution."
Scott
*CHL Instructor*
"Speed is Fine, but accuracy is final"- Bill Jordan
Remember those who died, remember those who killed them.
"Speed is Fine, but accuracy is final"- Bill Jordan
Remember those who died, remember those who killed them.