Gun confiscation
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 4
- Posts: 376
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:01 pm
- Location: Cedar Park / Austin
Re: Gun confiscation
Oboma is being under esimated here. Before the end of his next term he will make some sort of end run around the Constitusion to ban guns in the US. Perhapse a treaty with the UN. Whatever it takes. Turn them in or go to jail. Mark my words.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 4
- Posts: 5240
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:26 pm
- Location: Richardson, TX
Re: Gun confiscation
90 million Americans own guns. If 10% of them refuse to give them up, that's 9 million people. Where's the government going to put them all? I think outright confiscation will lead to civil war, and the government will lose in that case. 9 million motivated gun owners is about 7 times the total US military strength. Some of those military will not shoot Americans, and many of those 9 million are veterans of wars. The bloodbath would be horrible, and the government would not hold the moral high ground.handog wrote:Oboma is being under esimated here. Before the end of his next term he will make some sort of end run around the Constitusion to ban guns in the US. Perhapse a treaty with the UN. Whatever it takes. Turn them in or go to jail. Mark my words.
The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. James Madison
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member
Re: Gun confiscation
Maybe something like this would be the preferred method of assisting citizens be in compliance with the new pending laws. Courtesy of Homeland Security.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 4
- Posts: 376
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:01 pm
- Location: Cedar Park / Austin
Re: Gun confiscation
How about the outright confiscation during Katrina. Where were the 10% ?baldeagle wrote:90 million Americans own guns. If 10% of them refuse to give them up, that's 9 million people. Where's the government going to put them all? I think outright confiscation will lead to civil war, and the government will lose in that case. 9 million motivated gun owners is about 7 times the total US military strength. Some of those military will not shoot Americans, and many of those 9 million are veterans of wars. The bloodbath would be horrible, and the government would not hold the moral high ground.handog wrote:Oboma is being under esimated here. Before the end of his next term he will make some sort of end run around the Constitusion to ban guns in the US. Perhapse a treaty with the UN. Whatever it takes. Turn them in or go to jail. Mark my words.
DHS just purchase 1.4 billion rounds of ammo. Bloodbath?
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 3166
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:39 am
- Location: Bay Area, CA
Re: Gun confiscation
Dunno... Are we sure 10% of gun owners didn't lie and say they didn't own any guns?handog wrote:How about the outright confiscation during Katrina. Where were the 10% ?baldeagle wrote:90 million Americans own guns. If 10% of them refuse to give them up, that's 9 million people. Where's the government going to put them all? I think outright confiscation will lead to civil war, and the government will lose in that case. 9 million motivated gun owners is about 7 times the total US military strength. Some of those military will not shoot Americans, and many of those 9 million are veterans of wars. The bloodbath would be horrible, and the government would not hold the moral high ground.handog wrote:Oboma is being under esimated here. Before the end of his next term he will make some sort of end run around the Constitusion to ban guns in the US. Perhapse a treaty with the UN. Whatever it takes. Turn them in or go to jail. Mark my words.
I am not a lawyer, nor have I played one on TV, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, nor should anything I say be taken as legal advice. If it is important that any information be accurate, do not use me as the only source.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 4
- Posts: 376
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:01 pm
- Location: Cedar Park / Austin
Re: Gun confiscation
They may have. They could have buried their guns in the back yard. Making them all but useless. If so, they gave up their right to keep and bear arms. Bear meaning hold or carry. So much for the blood bath scenario.Dave2 wrote:Dunno... Are we sure 10% of gun owners didn't lie and say they didn't own any guns?handog wrote:How about the outright confiscation during Katrina. Where were the 10% ?baldeagle wrote:90 million Americans own guns. If 10% of them refuse to give them up, that's 9 million people. Where's the government going to put them all? I think outright confiscation will lead to civil war, and the government will lose in that case. 9 million motivated gun owners is about 7 times the total US military strength. Some of those military will not shoot Americans, and many of those 9 million are veterans of wars. The bloodbath would be horrible, and the government would not hold the moral high ground.handog wrote:Oboma is being under esimated here. Before the end of his next term he will make some sort of end run around the Constitusion to ban guns in the US. Perhapse a treaty with the UN. Whatever it takes. Turn them in or go to jail. Mark my words.
-
- Junior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 9:19 am
Re: Gun confiscation
All they need to do is add all semiautomatics to title 2 instead of banning by name or looks. Then the semiautos would need to be on the national registry or it's a Federal felony. Transfers would have to go through a Class 3 FFL with all the paperwork, transfer tax, and FBI approval. Also a CLEO sign off is required for transfers to individuals.
There are many Federal and local LEO who are willing to enforce this law currently, and adding semiautomatics would not change the basic nature of the law. Faced with the threat of losing their paychecks and pensions, I know how I would bet.
There are also many local LEO who enforce the handgun bans in Chicago, New York, etc. There are even more LEO who enforce laws that infringe the right to bear arms, so it's reasonable to think they would enforce an outright ban with the same enthusiasm and rationalization. After all, it would still be legal to own bolt action rifles and pump shotguns.
There are many Federal and local LEO who are willing to enforce this law currently, and adding semiautomatics would not change the basic nature of the law. Faced with the threat of losing their paychecks and pensions, I know how I would bet.
There are also many local LEO who enforce the handgun bans in Chicago, New York, etc. There are even more LEO who enforce laws that infringe the right to bear arms, so it's reasonable to think they would enforce an outright ban with the same enthusiasm and rationalization. After all, it would still be legal to own bolt action rifles and pump shotguns.
-
- Junior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:09 am
Re: Gun confiscation
Remember, treaty requires 2/3 of the Senate to ratify.handog wrote:Oboma is being under esimated here. Before the end of his next term he will make some sort of end run around the Constitusion to ban guns in the US. Perhapse a treaty with the UN. Whatever it takes. Turn them in or go to jail. Mark my words.
Join the Dallas City Troop
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 263
- Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 11:32 pm
- Location: Houston, Texas
- Contact:
Re: Gun confiscation
What wasn't lost in my boating accident was recently sold off at the GRB gun show in Houston...RockingRook wrote: I used to have 8 long guns, and 7 handguns. I gave all my long guns to my son and am left with 4 handguns.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 4159
- Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:01 pm
- Location: Northern DFW
Re: Gun confiscation
Do you mean like the Kyoto Treaty that the EPA is currently implementing?Tim_the_Bald wrote:Remember, treaty requires 2/3 of the Senate to ratify.handog wrote:Oboma is being under esimated here. Before the end of his next term he will make some sort of end run around the Constitusion to ban guns in the US. Perhapse a treaty with the UN. Whatever it takes. Turn them in or go to jail. Mark my words.
6/23-8/13/10 -51 days to plastic
Dum Spiro, Spero
Dum Spiro, Spero
Re: Gun confiscation
I wish my kayak didn't tip over/turtle so easily ...Rugrash wrote:What wasn't lost in my boating accident was recently sold off at the GRB gun show in Houston...RockingRook wrote: I used to have 8 long guns, and 7 handguns. I gave all my long guns to my son and am left with 4 handguns.
I'm no lawyer
"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
Re: Gun confiscation
One of my friends has suggested that gun confiscation might be the one thing that would actually cause Texas to secede from the union.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 5488
- Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:13 am
- Location: Klein, TX (Houston NW suburb)
Re: Gun confiscation
If it ever came to confiscation, I am not going to play the "boating accident" card. I'll be quite up front in saying, they are mine, you cannot have them. If you want them, come and try to take them.RPB wrote:I wish my kayak didn't tip over/turtle so easily ...Rugrash wrote:What wasn't lost in my boating accident was recently sold off at the GRB gun show in Houston...RockingRook wrote: I used to have 8 long guns, and 7 handguns. I gave all my long guns to my son and am left with 4 handguns.
-Just call me Bob . . . Texas Firearms Coalition, NRA Life member, TSRA Life member, and OFCC Patron member
This froggie ain't boiling! Shall not be infringed! Μολών Λαβέ
This froggie ain't boiling! Shall not be infringed! Μολών Λαβέ
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 823
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 2:30 pm
- Location: Wild West Houston
Re: Gun confiscation
I think your friend is out of touch with the bosses in Austin. Texas still doesn't have school carry, not even the watered down version limited to universities. Austin won't allow Texans with a carry license to carry handguns openly, when most other states with carry licenses do. Many of those states even allow UNLICENSED citizens to carry openly while in Texas you can lose your carry license and do jail time for not hiding your handgun.philip964 wrote:One of my friends has suggested that gun confiscation might be the one thing that would actually cause Texas to secede from the union.
Your friend really thinks those same people in Austin would vote to secede over one more federal gun law?
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 730
- Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:54 pm
Re: Gun confiscation
First, the military and LEO's follow the orders of those appointed over them, and if the law calls for gun confiscation, then they WILL do as they are ordered and attempt to confiscate guns.LSUTiger wrote:This is the same type of feedback I have received from my ex-military and LEO buddies. I hope what they say is true, that for the most part the LE and Military won't enforce gun confiscation.
Period.
Second, house to house gun confiscation is simply not practical. While I can see selected areas of any given community being targeted and searched, I don't see this course of action being employed for EVERY home in the nation. I can see them trying to establish a "no later time" for turn in, after which, any firearms found would be grounds for criminal charges.
Regardless, execution of any confiscation policy would require an enormous amount of logistical support and assets that can certainly be disrupted by a determined group of citizens without resorting to directly targeting individuals that are tasked with carrying out such policies.
88 day wait for the state to approve my constitutional right to bear arms...