Gun confiscation

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

handog
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 376
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:01 pm
Location: Cedar Park / Austin

Re: Gun confiscation

#16

Post by handog »

Oboma is being under esimated here. Before the end of his next term he will make some sort of end run around the Constitusion to ban guns in the US. Perhapse a treaty with the UN. Whatever it takes. Turn them in or go to jail. Mark my words.
User avatar

baldeagle
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 5240
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:26 pm
Location: Richardson, TX

Re: Gun confiscation

#17

Post by baldeagle »

handog wrote:Oboma is being under esimated here. Before the end of his next term he will make some sort of end run around the Constitusion to ban guns in the US. Perhapse a treaty with the UN. Whatever it takes. Turn them in or go to jail. Mark my words.
90 million Americans own guns. If 10% of them refuse to give them up, that's 9 million people. Where's the government going to put them all? I think outright confiscation will lead to civil war, and the government will lose in that case. 9 million motivated gun owners is about 7 times the total US military strength. Some of those military will not shoot Americans, and many of those 9 million are veterans of wars. The bloodbath would be horrible, and the government would not hold the moral high ground.
The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. James Madison
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member

brentski
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 11:43 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Gun confiscation

#18

Post by brentski »

Maybe something like this would be the preferred method of assisting citizens be in compliance with the new pending laws. Courtesy of Homeland Security.
Attachments
dhs-truck.jpg
User avatar

handog
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 376
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:01 pm
Location: Cedar Park / Austin

Re: Gun confiscation

#19

Post by handog »

baldeagle wrote:
handog wrote:Oboma is being under esimated here. Before the end of his next term he will make some sort of end run around the Constitusion to ban guns in the US. Perhapse a treaty with the UN. Whatever it takes. Turn them in or go to jail. Mark my words.
90 million Americans own guns. If 10% of them refuse to give them up, that's 9 million people. Where's the government going to put them all? I think outright confiscation will lead to civil war, and the government will lose in that case. 9 million motivated gun owners is about 7 times the total US military strength. Some of those military will not shoot Americans, and many of those 9 million are veterans of wars. The bloodbath would be horrible, and the government would not hold the moral high ground.
How about the outright confiscation during Katrina. Where were the 10% ?

DHS just purchase 1.4 billion rounds of ammo. Bloodbath?

Dave2
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 3166
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:39 am
Location: Bay Area, CA

Re: Gun confiscation

#20

Post by Dave2 »

handog wrote:
baldeagle wrote:
handog wrote:Oboma is being under esimated here. Before the end of his next term he will make some sort of end run around the Constitusion to ban guns in the US. Perhapse a treaty with the UN. Whatever it takes. Turn them in or go to jail. Mark my words.
90 million Americans own guns. If 10% of them refuse to give them up, that's 9 million people. Where's the government going to put them all? I think outright confiscation will lead to civil war, and the government will lose in that case. 9 million motivated gun owners is about 7 times the total US military strength. Some of those military will not shoot Americans, and many of those 9 million are veterans of wars. The bloodbath would be horrible, and the government would not hold the moral high ground.
How about the outright confiscation during Katrina. Where were the 10% ?
Dunno... Are we sure 10% of gun owners didn't lie and say they didn't own any guns?
I am not a lawyer, nor have I played one on TV, nor did I stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night, nor should anything I say be taken as legal advice. If it is important that any information be accurate, do not use me as the only source.
User avatar

handog
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 376
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:01 pm
Location: Cedar Park / Austin

Re: Gun confiscation

#21

Post by handog »

Dave2 wrote:
handog wrote:
baldeagle wrote:
handog wrote:Oboma is being under esimated here. Before the end of his next term he will make some sort of end run around the Constitusion to ban guns in the US. Perhapse a treaty with the UN. Whatever it takes. Turn them in or go to jail. Mark my words.
90 million Americans own guns. If 10% of them refuse to give them up, that's 9 million people. Where's the government going to put them all? I think outright confiscation will lead to civil war, and the government will lose in that case. 9 million motivated gun owners is about 7 times the total US military strength. Some of those military will not shoot Americans, and many of those 9 million are veterans of wars. The bloodbath would be horrible, and the government would not hold the moral high ground.
How about the outright confiscation during Katrina. Where were the 10% ?
Dunno... Are we sure 10% of gun owners didn't lie and say they didn't own any guns?
They may have. They could have buried their guns in the back yard. Making them all but useless. If so, they gave up their right to keep and bear arms. Bear meaning hold or carry. So much for the blood bath scenario.

Panzer Possum
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 41
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 9:19 am

Re: Gun confiscation

#22

Post by Panzer Possum »

All they need to do is add all semiautomatics to title 2 instead of banning by name or looks. Then the semiautos would need to be on the national registry or it's a Federal felony. Transfers would have to go through a Class 3 FFL with all the paperwork, transfer tax, and FBI approval. Also a CLEO sign off is required for transfers to individuals.

There are many Federal and local LEO who are willing to enforce this law currently, and adding semiautomatics would not change the basic nature of the law. Faced with the threat of losing their paychecks and pensions, I know how I would bet.

There are also many local LEO who enforce the handgun bans in Chicago, New York, etc. There are even more LEO who enforce laws that infringe the right to bear arms, so it's reasonable to think they would enforce an outright ban with the same enthusiasm and rationalization. After all, it would still be legal to own bolt action rifles and pump shotguns.
User avatar

Tim_the_Bald
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 23
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:09 am

Re: Gun confiscation

#23

Post by Tim_the_Bald »

handog wrote:Oboma is being under esimated here. Before the end of his next term he will make some sort of end run around the Constitusion to ban guns in the US. Perhapse a treaty with the UN. Whatever it takes. Turn them in or go to jail. Mark my words.
Remember, treaty requires 2/3 of the Senate to ratify.
Join the Dallas City Troop

Rugrash
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 263
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 11:32 pm
Location: Houston, Texas
Contact:

Re: Gun confiscation

#24

Post by Rugrash »

RockingRook wrote: I used to have 8 long guns, and 7 handguns. I gave all my long guns to my son and am left with 4 handguns.
What wasn't lost in my boating accident was recently sold off at the GRB gun show in Houston...

chasfm11
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 4159
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:01 pm
Location: Northern DFW

Re: Gun confiscation

#25

Post by chasfm11 »

Tim_the_Bald wrote:
handog wrote:Oboma is being under esimated here. Before the end of his next term he will make some sort of end run around the Constitusion to ban guns in the US. Perhapse a treaty with the UN. Whatever it takes. Turn them in or go to jail. Mark my words.
Remember, treaty requires 2/3 of the Senate to ratify.
Do you mean like the Kyoto Treaty that the EPA is currently implementing?
6/23-8/13/10 -51 days to plastic
Dum Spiro, Spero

RPB
Banned
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 8697
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Gun confiscation

#26

Post by RPB »

Rugrash wrote:
RockingRook wrote: I used to have 8 long guns, and 7 handguns. I gave all my long guns to my son and am left with 4 handguns.
What wasn't lost in my boating accident was recently sold off at the GRB gun show in Houston...
I wish my kayak didn't tip over/turtle so easily ...
I'm no lawyer

"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"

philip964
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 18287
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:30 pm

Re: Gun confiscation

#27

Post by philip964 »

One of my friends has suggested that gun confiscation might be the one thing that would actually cause Texas to secede from the union.
User avatar

Jumping Frog
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5488
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:13 am
Location: Klein, TX (Houston NW suburb)

Re: Gun confiscation

#28

Post by Jumping Frog »

RPB wrote:
Rugrash wrote:
RockingRook wrote: I used to have 8 long guns, and 7 handguns. I gave all my long guns to my son and am left with 4 handguns.
What wasn't lost in my boating accident was recently sold off at the GRB gun show in Houston...
I wish my kayak didn't tip over/turtle so easily ...
If it ever came to confiscation, I am not going to play the "boating accident" card. I'll be quite up front in saying, they are mine, you cannot have them. If you want them, come and try to take them.
-Just call me Bob . . . Texas Firearms Coalition, NRA Life member, TSRA Life member, and OFCC Patron member

This froggie ain't boiling! Shall not be infringed! Μολών Λαβέ

bayouhazard
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 823
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 2:30 pm
Location: Wild West Houston

Re: Gun confiscation

#29

Post by bayouhazard »

philip964 wrote:One of my friends has suggested that gun confiscation might be the one thing that would actually cause Texas to secede from the union.
I think your friend is out of touch with the bosses in Austin. Texas still doesn't have school carry, not even the watered down version limited to universities. Austin won't allow Texans with a carry license to carry handguns openly, when most other states with carry licenses do. Many of those states even allow UNLICENSED citizens to carry openly while in Texas you can lose your carry license and do jail time for not hiding your handgun.

Your friend really thinks those same people in Austin would vote to secede over one more federal gun law? :lol::
User avatar

Texas Dan Mosby
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 730
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 3:54 pm

Re: Gun confiscation

#30

Post by Texas Dan Mosby »

LSUTiger wrote:This is the same type of feedback I have received from my ex-military and LEO buddies. I hope what they say is true, that for the most part the LE and Military won't enforce gun confiscation.
First, the military and LEO's follow the orders of those appointed over them, and if the law calls for gun confiscation, then they WILL do as they are ordered and attempt to confiscate guns.

Period.

Second, house to house gun confiscation is simply not practical. While I can see selected areas of any given community being targeted and searched, I don't see this course of action being employed for EVERY home in the nation. I can see them trying to establish a "no later time" for turn in, after which, any firearms found would be grounds for criminal charges.

Regardless, execution of any confiscation policy would require an enormous amount of logistical support and assets that can certainly be disrupted by a determined group of citizens without resorting to directly targeting individuals that are tasked with carrying out such policies.
88 day wait for the state to approve my constitutional right to bear arms...
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”