A Leter to my Local School Superintendent

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

Topic author
RoyGBiv
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 9551
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:41 am
Location: Fort Worth

A Leter to my Local School Superintendent

#1

Post by RoyGBiv »

Here's a letter I've drafted to the Superintendent of my local ISD... I'll also cc: the Board.
Comments/suggestions are welcome. I plan on hitting the SEND button tomorrow after I've had a chance to review it.
Dear ________________,
After the tragic events in Connecticut last week, I'm sure you've been flooded with "What are we doing about this?" questions and suggestions. Hopefully some of the suggestions you're receiving are grounded in fact and not just emotion.

It's been my opinion for some time that "Gun Free Zones" and "Gun Free Schools" are nothing more than feel-good words that have little connection to securing real safety. These words are little more than hollow marketing phrases intended to placate the masses, empty words that accomplish nothing, that leave our most precious, most vulnerable loved ones at increased risk from the kind of evil we saw in Newtown last Friday. Who obeys those signs? Will an evil killer be stopped by a plastic sign on your door? It's the height of hubris, and completely irresponsible for us to believe so.

When I was VP of our HOA a few years ago, our gated community was hit with a string of car and home break-ins'. I was amazed that residents reactions were "but we have gates.... how come the gates didn't stop this? We need to add cameras, that will be even better." People completely ignored the fact that the cars broken into were parked on the street instead of in garages, and the houses robbed were chosen because the thieves stole the garage door openers out of the cars parked in the street. Where is personal responsibility, reality-based security assessment and planning today?

As a parent of children in your district, I've stood by shaking my head at the false security provided by a locked door and buzzer system. Anyone who rings the bell gets buzzed in. What good is that kind of security? Let's admit today that it's no good at all in an active shooter situation. Even if you don't buzz them in, as we saw in CT an active shooter can come through the glass with a single shot.

Now that the shooter is in the building, what are we teaching students and faculty to do? Lock the doors. Hide under their desks. Huddle together in bunches making easy groups of targets. This plan is effective to some extent, certainly. But at some point having your intended victims bunched up in locked rooms just makes things easier for the evil-doers. It's time to move beyond feel good signs and cooperative-victim behaviors and start training our students and faculty that there may come a point where taking an active role in your own self defense becomes the better, more sensible, less deadly thing to do.

With this in mind I would encourage you to consider two fundamental changes to your security planning.

1. ALICE** (or similar) training. Alert, Lockdown, Inform, Counter, Evacuate. http://www.responseoptions.com/pages/home.asp" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
We seem to be doing a fair job with A, L, I and E, but we do nothing about "Countering". We're teaching people to be passive, and that allows evil-doers time and opportunity. (** note: I have no affiliation with this organization)

and

2. It's time to follow the lead of Harrold ISD and allow (encourage and provide training) teachers and faculty to carry weapons on campus. Rather than throw her body in front of an active shooter, I believe Sandy Hook Principal Dawn Hochsprung and many of her students and faculty would be alive today if she had an effective weapon with which to fight her attacker. We certainly don't like the feelings invoked by the idea of guns in schools, but the fact is that a gun in the hands of properly trained volunteers would have saved lives in Sandy Hook. Every time I see a "No Guns" sign on the door of your schools I cringe. Who is that sign stopping? Certainly not the "bad guys". I encourage you to contact the leadership at Harrold (David Thweatt is the Superintendent there, david.thweatt@harroldisd.net ) and solicit their feedback. You and your board have the legal authority under Texas law to make this a reality. The ISD can make this happen if it chooses to do so. I'd be happy to help with fund raising for training if needed.

We all wish the world was a place where evil didn't exist, or at least a place where even the wort evils still respected the lives of children. Unfortunately, reality is quite different. Regardless of our political opinions on guns, we must own up to the fact that we cannot eliminate the kind of evil that would kill innocent children. We can never completely eliminate the threat of a determined, deranged killer. We must face this problem with our eyes open and plan our course based on those things that are within our grasp to control. We can't rely on more words or more legislation, or on a ridiculous wish that some signs posted on fragile glass doors will keep our children safe. I pray that myth was forever shattered by the senseless tragedy in Newtown.

Thanks very much for your time in reading this. Please feel free to share this message with others who may have an interest in this subject. I would welcome the opportunity to talk with you further, should you have any questions.

Best Regards,
RGB
I am not a lawyer. This is NOT legal advice.!
Nothing tempers idealism quite like the cold bath of reality.... SQLGeek

Shoot_First
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 189
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 5:25 pm
Location: Texas

Re: A Leter to my Local School Superintendent

#2

Post by Shoot_First »

I have discussed this subject with friends over the last few days without coming up with many good answers. So far:

1. Armed security or "resource" officers in every school...very expensive!
2. Volunteer CHL holders to patrol in those schools without armed security officers... a legal nightmare along with a host of coordination and scheduling issues.
3. Emergency escape door or window in every 1st floor classroom.
4. A large, ie, auditorium or gym, room that could be made into a somewhat secure safe room...not enough time to get there, shooter could shoot thru doors or gas, a bomb, or a fire could kill all.

Wish there was more, but absent other feedback RBG's draft is a good start.

Rex B
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3615
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 3:30 pm
Location: DFW

Re: A Leter to my Local School Superintendent

#3

Post by Rex B »

RGB, I think your message is well thought out and cover the points.
I'd send it as-is.

Good job :cheers2:
-----------
“Sometimes there is no alternative to uncertainty except to await the arrival of more and better data.” C. Wunsch
User avatar

mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 9043
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: A Leter to my Local School Superintendent

#4

Post by mojo84 »

Talking to my fifth grader when she got home from school. She indicated there wasn't a lot of talk about the Conn shooting. She did say she could tell the teachers seemed "nervous" and that something was different. All the exterior doors were locked down a little earlier than normal and there were two police officers walking around the school all day. They normally do not have a fulltime SRO. Usually, the SRO from either the high school or middle school stops by periodically.

Not sure how long the two police officers being stationed there will last but at least they are taking some steps. We also received an email reiterating the policy that all visitors must check in at the office and get a visitor sticker.

The other somewhat comforting thing is the Sheriff's office headquarters is across the street.

I am also contemplating sending a similar letter.
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.

Ericstac
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 467
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2012 6:21 am
Location: Fort Bend Co.

Re: A Leter to my Local School Superintendent

#5

Post by Ericstac »

It's a lot more thorough than the one I shot to the super in my ISD today.. One thing you might consider is starting off with something positive... Here is mine,

Mr. Super,

I wanted to thank you for what I would call a conversative approach to our school system. I continously shock others when I tell them the kind of guidelines that are setup to keep our children clean and respectful kids. I am also shocked when others tell me how their kids can walk around with their clothes baggy in every direction and hair as long as they want. It is rediculous, but it reminds me of why I am so proud of Needville ISD.

My main concern, or I should say, the main concern from our tight niched community is the safety of our children at all the campuses. This of course was brought to light after Friday's tragedy in Newtown, CT. I had a small gathering Friday evening which included several that had children in Needville and we were all concerned about the low level of security in place today. I'm quite sure you have a current plan for an active shooter or some other level of threat but I know it isn't enough. I have been to the schools plenty of times and it is very easy to walk through and enter into any class desired.

Just like nearly all of our community my family backs our 2nd amendment rights and feel that the school district need to take the next step into stopping these acts of violence. Having our schools known as "gun free zones" lets the terrorist know that he will not be met with exchanged fire. He knows entering our schools he has a good 5-10 minutes to do what ever he pleases before taking his life once the law enforcement arrives. If you look at all the mass murders in the States you will find most are in "gun free zones" and many, many times the agressor kills himeself once the police or some other threat intervenes.

Other communities much like ours are taking action and approving policy chages allowing teachers and staff to conceal carry while on the job. I hope our district is following these same principles to help deter and minimize the risk and damage that one could cause on our community today.


Texas School Approves Carry
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,404721,00.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


Oregon Mall Shooter kills himself after seeing a defendant and his gun
http://www.kgw.com/news/Clackamas-man-a ... 93571.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


I am writing to you on behelf of our community and we would like to know when someone enters our schools and has a gun drawn on our child who will be pointing back?

Thank you for your time and I look forward to your response.

Eric
User avatar

Topic author
RoyGBiv
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 9551
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:41 am
Location: Fort Worth

Re: A Leter to my Local School Superintendent

#6

Post by RoyGBiv »

Ericstac wrote:
Oregon Mall Shooter kills himself after seeing a defendant and his gun
http://www.kgw.com/news/Clackamas-man-a ... 93571.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I've been trying to find a way to make this point.... Still working on it.

Thanks to all for the feedback/suggestions... Please keep them coming. :tiphat:

I'll post the final version here tomorrow in case anyone might find it useful.
I am not a lawyer. This is NOT legal advice.!
Nothing tempers idealism quite like the cold bath of reality.... SQLGeek
User avatar

Wodathunkit
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 895
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 11:18 am
Location: Friendswood, Texas

Re: A Leter to my Local School Superintendent

#7

Post by Wodathunkit »

Roy, I like the thought but might I offer a different approach. Child safety is so important that I'm thinking about scheduling a face-2-face meeting with our superintendent. I would save the letter you wrote for a "letter to the editor" of our local paper if I thought the meeting didn't lead down the right path.

Sit with him/her, they may need support from you for this campaign to be successful.

My 2 cents
"Character is doing the right thing, even when nobody is looking" - J.C. watts Jr.
CHL since Jan. 2013
53 days mailbox to mailbox.
User avatar

Topic author
RoyGBiv
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 9551
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:41 am
Location: Fort Worth

Re: A Leter to my Local School Superintendent

#8

Post by RoyGBiv »

Wodathunkit wrote:Roy, I like the thought but might I offer a different approach. Child safety is so important that I'm thinking about scheduling a face-2-face meeting with our superintendent. I would save the letter you wrote for a "letter to the editor" of our local paper if I thought the meeting didn't lead down the right path.

Sit with him/her, they may need support from you for this campaign to be successful.

My 2 cents
I'm working on beefing up the closing statement a bit... making it more of a "I'm ready to get to work with you" thing. Honestly, if he's not at least considering something like this then I'm not inclined to waste my or his time on a face to face... For me this was more of a non-confrontational opening move ... Something I could follow up with a call or meeting request... Maybe I have that backwards.. I'll think on it a bit.. I'm assuming he's waist deep in opinions and concerned parents right now...

I do see your point.... I've got a good relationship with some of the principals, I might just give them a call and see if they have any feeling for where the Super's head is at on this...

Thanks.!
I am not a lawyer. This is NOT legal advice.!
Nothing tempers idealism quite like the cold bath of reality.... SQLGeek
User avatar

Wodathunkit
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 895
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 11:18 am
Location: Friendswood, Texas

Re: A Leter to my Local School Superintendent

#9

Post by Wodathunkit »

RoyGBiv wrote:
Wodathunkit wrote:Roy, I like the thought but might I offer a different approach. Child safety is so important that I'm thinking about scheduling a face-2-face meeting with our superintendent. I would save the letter you wrote for a "letter to the editor" of our local paper if I thought the meeting didn't lead down the right path.

Sit with him/her, they may need support from you for this campaign to be successful.

My 2 cents
I'm working on beefing up the closing statement a bit... making it more of a "I'm ready to get to work with you" thing. Honestly, if he's not at least considering something like this then I'm not inclined to waste my or his time on a face to face... For me this was more of a non-confrontational opening move ... Something I could follow up with a call or meeting request... Maybe I have that backwards.. I'll think on it a bit.. I'm assuming he's waist deep in opinions and concerned parents right now...

I do see your point.... I've got a good relationship with some of the principals, I might just give them a call and see if they have any feeling for where the Super's head is at on this...

Thanks.!
That is a thought, if you can get principals on your side, and maybe the PTA, then you might have some leverage with a letter or meeting.
"Character is doing the right thing, even when nobody is looking" - J.C. watts Jr.
CHL since Jan. 2013
53 days mailbox to mailbox.

trumanOscar
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2012 9:51 pm

Re: A Leter to my Local School Superintendent

#10

Post by trumanOscar »

The letter is great.

But don't forget to write your state and federal representatives. After reading this letter, I wrote my representatives.

You can find your Federal Senator at:
http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_i ... m?State=TX" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar

xring
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 97
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:23 am
Location: Galveston County

Re: A Leter to my Local School Superintendent

#11

Post by xring »

Here are just a few changes or additions that you might consider including. Our teachers are teachers not Doctors, Firefighters, or Police Officers. This does not mean that they cannot make a valuable contribution in the areas that these professionals are experts in. In each area of safety and health the most valuable asset is time. It takes time to get to the Doctor or for a fire truck to get to a location. EMTs and Police Officers also take valuable time to arrive to an emergency location. Most people have no qualms about teaching basic first aid or how to operate a fire extinguisher to nonprofessional personnel. First aid equipment, fire extinguishers Automated CPR aids are by their very nature designed to be operated with a small amount of training. All of these are great but are virtually useless against an armed assailant. The hardening of the schools entrance is great. It is so good in fact that we should triple the protection. The entrance should require two separate buzz ins. This would double the time it takes to break through the entrance doors. (Remember how valuable time is) The controlled doors should not have safety exit bars. These Bars should be on solid doors that do not have glass within arm’s reach of the safety exit bar. This keeps the intruder from shooting out the glass and pulling safety bar. (Again more time). Class room doors should be of solid construction and should have either an automatic locking device triggered by the office and the classroom or at least a very good door bolt. (Again gaining time) Inside each classroom there should be a very secure locker /safe in an accessible but inconspicuous location. In this safe a 20 gauge (Because many Teachers are Women) pump shotgun and at least 5 rounds of ammunition pre-loaded in the magazine should be accessible to the Teacher in a very short time. I don’t know many people willing to shoot the lock off a door then enter though that small opening when a shotgun is waiting behind it. I am sure most schools have intercom systems that can warn of intruders. Make sure that there is a person within reach of the intercom or maybe an alarm panic button that is located in several locations plus a few panic buttons worn on the person of pre-selected staff members. These improvements and additions would at the very least drastically reduce casualties in a school invasion they would buy valuable time for the police to arrive and take control of the situation. Maybe they could do more than count bodies. I would suggest that a teacher in service day could be used to train teachers to do CPR, Some Basic First aid. Operate a fire extinguisher, operate the door locks and Gun safe and operate the pump shotgun. If a teacher is unwilling to learn these emergency skills then I submit that he or she does not have our children’s best interest at heart and should find another profession. I had one other idea. With the return of our combat veterans we have many individuals that already possess the skills to needed to oppose aggressors maybe we could use them as to help train our teachers or become teachers themselves. I am not suggesting our teachers go out searching for the bad guys just to defend a locked door and the precious treasure behind it.
Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock.
Will Rogers

ctb5
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 27
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 10:51 pm
Location: Clear Lake area

Re: A Leter to my Local School Superintendent

#12

Post by ctb5 »

I wouldn't put in anything suggesting that teachers be required to participate in a firearms program: merely that those teachers who have already taken the personal initiative to obtain a CHL should be permitted to carry concealed on school premises.

The effectiveness of concealed handgun licensing is that the means of protection is dispersed among the population needing protection, so that no-one is reliant on a single security guard or a police patrol that may take twenty minutes to respond. CHL holders are trained, qualified, and among the safest individuals in society, being statistically less likely to commit violent crimes than almost every other group, up to and including law enforcement personnel.

If there are concerns about children gaining access to a teacher's firearm, school districts could install quick-access wall safes in those teachers' classrooms, similar to how many organizations install defibrillator kits near select trained personnel. This would be a low-cost and low-visibility method of improving response against violent threats.
User avatar

Topic author
RoyGBiv
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 9551
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:41 am
Location: Fort Worth

Re: A Leter to my Local School Superintendent

#13

Post by RoyGBiv »

Here's the final version I just sent out to the Superintendent, District Security Supervisor, President and VP of the ISD Board of Directors and the several school Principals with whom I have a relationship.

Not all of this is my original thought, so, THANKS! again to those who allowed me to use their words here.

Feel free to use this if you feel it would be helpful.
Dear ______________,
After the tragic events in Connecticut last week, I'm sure you've been flooded with "What are we doing about this?" questions and suggestions. Hopefully some of the suggestions you're receiving are grounded in fact and not just emotion.

It's been my belief for some time that "Gun Free Zones" and "Gun Free Schools" are nothing more than feel-good words that have little connection to securing real safety, they're merely "marketing" intended to placate the masses. These words leave us with a false sense of security that leaves our most precious, most vulnerable loved ones at even greater risk from the kind of evil we saw in Newtown last Friday. Who obeys those signs? Will an evil killer be stopped by a plastic sign and a buzzer on our door? It's the height of hubris, and completely irresponsible for us to believe so.

When I was VP of our HOA a few years ago, our gated community was hit with a string of car and home break-ins'. I was amazed that residents reactions were most commonly "..... but we have gates.... how come the gates didn't stop this? We need to add cameras, that will be even better." People completely ignored the fact that the cars broken into were parked on the street instead of in garages, and the houses robbed were chosen because the thieves stole the garage door openers out of the cars parked in the street. They wanted to add more layers of "feel-good", rather than make the simple mindset and habit changes necessary to achieve real improvement. Where is personal responsibility, reality-based security assessment and self-honest planning today?

As a parent of children in your district, I've stood shaking my head at the false security provided by a locked glass door and buzzer system. Anyone who rings the bell gets buzzed in. What good is that kind of security? Let's admit today that it's no good at all in an active shooter situation. Even if you don't buzz them in, as we saw in CT an active shooter can come through the glass with a single shot.

Now that the shooter is in the building, what are we teaching students and faculty to do? Lock the doors. Hide under their desks. Huddle together in bunches making easy groups of targets. This plan is effective to some extent, certainly. But at some point having the intended victims bunched up in locked rooms makes things easier for the evil-doers. It's time to move beyond feel good signs and passive-victim behaviors and start training our students and faculty that there may come a point where taking an active role in your own self defense becomes the better, more sensible, less deadly thing to do.

With this in mind I would encourage you to consider two fundamental changes to your security planning.

1. ALICE** (or similar) training. Alert, Lockdown, Inform, Counter, Evacuate. http://www.responseoptions.com/pages/home.asp" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Our ISD appears to be doing a good job with A, L, I and E, but as far as I know we do nothing about C, "Countering". We're teaching people to be passive, and that allows evil-doers time and opportunity. This gap in our planning needs to be addressed. (** note: I have no affiliation with this organization)

and

2. It's time to follow the lead of Harrold ISD and allow (encourage and provide training for) teachers and faculty to carry weapons on campus. Rather than throw her body in front of an active shooter, I believe Sandy Hook Principal Dawn Hochsprung and many of her students and faculty would be alive today if she had an effective weapon with which to repel her killer. We certainly don't like the feelings invoked by the idea of guns in schools. "That is not the world I want to live in", any sane person would say. Unfortunately what we "want" is not our "reality". The irrefutable fact is that a gun in the hands of properly trained volunteers could have saved lives at Sandy Hook. Every time I see a "No Guns" sign on the doors of our schools I think, "Who is that sign stopping?" Certainly not the "bad guys". I encourage you to contact the leadership at Harrold ISD (David Thweatt is the Superintendent there, david.thweatt@harroldisd.net ) and solicit their input. You and your board already have the authority under Texas law to make this policy change a reality. The ISD can make this happen if it chooses to do so. I'd be happy to help with fund raising and organizing for training if needed.

We all wish the world was a place where evil didn't exist, or at least a place where even the worst evils still respected the lives of children. Unfortunately, this is not our reality. No loving parent or teacher would choose to have guns in school if this kind of evil could be mitigated with simple words or new laws or even steel bars on the windows. Regardless of our political opinions on guns, we must own up to the fact that we cannot eliminate the kind of evil that would exploit our vulnerabilities to kill innocent children. We must face this problem with our eyes open and plan our course based on those things that are within our grasp to control. We can't rely on mere words or more legislation, or on a futile wish that a few signs posted on fragile glass doors will keep our children safe. I pray that myth was thoroughly and forever exposed by the senseless tragedy in Newtown.

There are many who would have us believe that the "need" for a gun is a symptom of weakness and insecurity. "We don't need more guns, we need more restrictions, more laws and better mental health screening", they would have us believe. These same people would never argue against keeping a fire extinguisher in the kitchen. A kitchen fire is a similarly remote possibility. Do we live in constant fear of a kitchen fire? Of course not. We keep an extinguisher on hand because we would be foolish not to do so. Because on the chance that we ever DO have a kitchen fire we'll be equipped to stop it before our house burns down. The extinguisher doesn't dominate our thoughts, its presence in our kitchen allows us to go forward with our daily lives knowing we have the tools to deal with a known, real, potentially-life-changing problem should it arise. The Boy Scouts have a motto that covers this nicely, "Be Prepared".

Thanks very much for your time in reading this and for all of your efforts on behalf of our children. Please feel free to share this message with others who may have an interest in this subject. I would welcome the opportunity to talk with you further, should you have any questions and I stand ready to help you should you feel this path is worth further action or investigation.

Best Regards,
[RGB]

Relevant Links:
Interviews with Harrold ISD Superintendent David Thweatt : LINK1 and Link2 to FW Star Telegram, Link3 to Fox News

John Lott, on gun-free zones, 15 & 17-Dec-12: Link1 and Link2

Charles L. Cotton, Lawyer, TX House & Senate Consultant, NRA Director: "Do we really want safe schools?" - Link
The links referred to above are as follows:
David Thewatt Interviews:
http://blogs.star-telegram.com/crime_ti ... ounts.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.star-telegram.com/2012/12/14 ... carry.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/12/18/st ... officials/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

John Lott commentary:
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Lott-g ... /id/467903" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.inquisitr.com/442129/more-gu ... tt-claims/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Charles Cotton commentary
http://www.texasshooting.com/blog/?p=292" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I am not a lawyer. This is NOT legal advice.!
Nothing tempers idealism quite like the cold bath of reality.... SQLGeek

Vic
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 137
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 12:45 pm
Location: Nederland/Beaumont

Re: A Leter to my Local School Superintendent

#14

Post by Vic »

It may be worthy of inclusion if your local community enjoys this particular pre-existing facility:

I am an adjunct instructor for a local community college. This very college also happens to house the area's TCLEOSE-certified police academy, complete with firearms training resources. The burden of training teachers to be more proficient with firearms and in surviving and defending themselves and the students could be greatly reduced from a financial perspective since these facilities already exist and have a vested interest in school safety.

While the legalities and the liabilities of doing this must be left to those more qualified than I, the fact remains that the resources required to enhance faculty and staff training in this regard already exist and do not have to be purchased from scratch.
"Let us speak courteously, deal fairly, and keep ourselves armed and ready." -- Teddy Roosevelt
User avatar

Topic author
RoyGBiv
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 9551
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:41 am
Location: Fort Worth

Re: A Leter to my Local School Superintendent

#15

Post by RoyGBiv »

Honestly, I don't expect anything immediate to come of this letter.
Like water carving canyons, political change is slow.

I certainly wanted to let the "folks in charge" know that at least some of the people they serve are in favor of taking the restraints off teachers who choose to carry. My kids are too important to leave them protected only by a glass door, a sign and a buzzer.

It's just a start. Hopefully I'm not the only one.
I'll be talking with my neighbors.
I am not a lawyer. This is NOT legal advice.!
Nothing tempers idealism quite like the cold bath of reality.... SQLGeek
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”