50 States Secede

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

Jaguar
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 1332
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 5:24 pm
Location: Just west of Cool, Texas

Re: 15 States Secede

#16

Post by Jaguar »

gdanaher wrote:Perhaps all those folks who find themselves dissatisfied with the election results should consider how they might adjust their party's political and social agendas to better dovetail with the views of the majority of the nation's population. It was all just fine and good when the nation was composed of angry old white men, but the party hasn't changed while everything else has. And while they are at it, they might want to give all their senatorial candidates a test or review session on female reproductive physiology. If they think they can win in the future and not make changes, they are just as foolish as those who think that seceding is a viable option.
Conservatives should become Liberals, so they can win?

Should we also increase social spending, tax the rich (old white men), and do away with the second amendment (angry old white men), since it seem that is what the majority wants?
"I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." -- James Madison
User avatar

Purplehood
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 4638
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:35 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: 15 States Secede

#17

Post by Purplehood »

Jaguar wrote:
gdanaher wrote:Perhaps all those folks who find themselves dissatisfied with the election results should consider how they might adjust their party's political and social agendas to better dovetail with the views of the majority of the nation's population. It was all just fine and good when the nation was composed of angry old white men, but the party hasn't changed while everything else has. And while they are at it, they might want to give all their senatorial candidates a test or review session on female reproductive physiology. If they think they can win in the future and not make changes, they are just as foolish as those who think that seceding is a viable option.
Conservatives should become Liberals, so they can win?

Should we also increase social spending, tax the rich (old white men), and do away with the second amendment (angry old white men), since it seem that is what the majority wants?
Please look up the word, "fallacies". It is not a scatological reference.
Life NRA
USMC 76-93
USAR 99-07 (Retired)
OEF 06-07
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 26852
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: 15 States Secede

#18

Post by The Annoyed Man »

IBTL
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT

XDSConcealer
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 3:20 pm
Location: Sugar Land

Re: 15 States Secede

#19

Post by XDSConcealer »

The notion of seceding from the Union is ridiculous. All these 15 states have done is provide O-douche-a a list of "Who am I going to screw next?"

I can see Valarie Jarrett now getting her revenge strategy together.

I don't like this administration anymore than most people on this Board but the idea of this petition really isn't accomplishing anything.
8/13 - Mailed Packet
9/4 - DPS Received Packet, BG under Review
9/20-9/22 - Manufacturing Pending, Manufacturing, Mailed
9/29 - Plastic in hand

Heartland Patriot

Re: 15 States Secede

#20

Post by Heartland Patriot »

Obviously a hot topic. However, using a phrase such as "angry old white men" in a forum where a lot of the members are older European-descent males who are not happy with this election would seem to be TROLLING. Sorry if you don't like my observation, but I call them like I see them.
User avatar

Slowplay
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 305
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2011 5:52 pm
Location: DFW

Re: 15 States Secede

#21

Post by Slowplay »

Heartland Patriot wrote:Obviously a hot topic. However, using a phrase such as "angry old white men" in a forum where a lot of the members are older European-descent males who are not happy with this election would seem to be TROLLING. Sorry if you don't like my observation, but I call them like I see them.
A common occurrence with that particular forum member...

There are many Americans that still believe in the U.S. Constitution, but don't like the "fundamental change" that is happening to the nation as we drift further into a democratic socialist welfare state. They are frustrated. I get that. But this secession talk is wrong. The democratic socialist welfare state loving folks need to leave, not the other way around.

If this "fundamental change" had occurred as a result of Article V of the U.S. Constitution, then maybe it would be easier to accept - but it didn't (and wouldn't). I understand the frustration.
NRA Benefactor Member
"It is the common fate of the indolent to see their rights become a prey to the active. The condition upon which God hath given liberty to man is eternal vigilance..."
- John Philpot Curran

Topic author
RPB
Banned
Posts in topic: 10
Posts: 8697
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: 15 States Secede

#22

Post by RPB »

I just figured the Obama DHS Secret Police created petitions themselves to collect names of dissidents for future "lists"

:biggrinjester:
I'm no lawyer

"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
User avatar

VMI77
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 25
Posts: 6096
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:49 pm
Location: Victoria, Texas

Re: 15 States Secede

#23

Post by VMI77 »

equin wrote:Saw this on another forum. Call me a die-hard American patriot who still believes in America, but I respectfully disagree with secession. :patriot:

Many from Texas fought and died for these UNITED States, including Harlon Block shown in the famous flag-raising photo at the Battle of Iwo Jima (photo by Joe Rosenthal of the Associated Press):

[ Image ]

Sadly, many from Texas and other states and territories of the UNITED States continue to do so in Afghanistan.

States like Kalifornia, New Jersey, Maryland, and Connecticut are no longer really part of the United States, since the majority of their populations and their governments do not share the fundamental values and principles on which the United States was founded. America isn't a geographical location, it's the expression of fundamental values about the organization of government and the relationship between individuals and the State. Obama and a good number of his supporters are active enemies of those values. The men who fought in WW2 were fighting for a different country than what is represented by many of what I'll just call today's "blue states."

That said I don't believe there is any chance of succession short of some national catastrophic event that threatens to take the entire country down with the blue states.
"Journalism, n. A job for people who flunked out of STEM courses, enjoy making up stories, and have no detectable integrity or morals."

From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com
User avatar

VMI77
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 25
Posts: 6096
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:49 pm
Location: Victoria, Texas

Re: 15 States Secede

#24

Post by VMI77 »

gdanaher wrote:Perhaps all those folks who find themselves dissatisfied with the election results should consider how they might adjust their party's political and social agendas to better dovetail with the views of the majority of the nation's population. It was all just fine and good when the nation was composed of angry old white men, but the party hasn't changed while everything else has. And while they are at it, they might want to give all their senatorial candidates a test or review session on female reproductive physiology. If they think they can win in the future and not make changes, they are just as foolish as those who think that seceding is a viable option.

Wow, talk about totally missing the point: this "angry old white man" REJECTS "the change." Your advice is the political equivalent of telling a rape victim that if she can't fight it she might as well relax and enjoy it. I'm not going to "adjust" my political and social agendas to appease the mob or merely surrender to collectivism out of convenience or some misplaced conception of inevitability. The current situation is not some accidental byproduct of social development, it's an engineered condition brought about by decades of collectivist control of the school system and MSM. I'm certainly not going to stop opposing this disastrous, immoral, and unnatural cabal of ideologues, opportunists, and free-loaders when things like homeschooling and the internet are arising in opposition to this treacherous attack on the fundamental principles that made the United States of America the greatest experiment in government and the greatest country in the world.
Last edited by VMI77 on Mon Nov 12, 2012 12:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Journalism, n. A job for people who flunked out of STEM courses, enjoy making up stories, and have no detectable integrity or morals."

From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com
User avatar

SewTexas
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 3509
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 11:52 pm
Location: Alvin
Contact:

Re: 15 States Secede

#25

Post by SewTexas »

RPB wrote:I just figured the Obama DHS Secret Police created petitions themselves to collect names of dissidents for future "lists"

:biggrinjester:

in other words.....we might as well all go sign every petition... :roll: it's not like we're not on most every list anyway :mrgreen:
~Tracy
Gun control is what you talk about when you don't want to talk about the truth ~ Colion Noir
User avatar

sjfcontrol
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 12
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Flint, TX

Re: 15 States Secede

#26

Post by sjfcontrol »

VMI77 wrote:
gdanaher wrote:Perhaps all those folks who find themselves dissatisfied with the election results should consider how they might adjust their party's political and social agendas to better dovetail with the views of the majority of the nation's population. It was all just fine and good when the nation was composed of angry old white men, but the party hasn't changed while everything else has. And while they are at it, they might want to give all their senatorial candidates a test or review session on female reproductive physiology. If they think they can win in the future and not make changes, they are just as foolish as those who think that seceding is a viable option.

Wow, talk about totally missing the point: this "angry old white man" REJECTS "the change." Your advice is the political equivalent of telling a rape victim that if she can't fight it she might as well relax and enjoy it. I'm not going to "adjust" my political and social agendas to appease the mob or merely surrender to collectivism out of convenience or some misplaced conception of inevitability. The current situation is not some accidental byproduct of social development, it's an engineered condition brought about by decades of collectivist control of the school system and MSM. I'm certainly not going to stop opposing this disastrous, immoral, and unnatural cabal of ideologues, opportunists, and free-loaders when things like homeschooling and the internet are arising in opposition to this treacherous attack on the fundamental principles that made the United States of America the greatest experiment in government and the greatest country in the world.
Seems to me that anybody willing to change their principles in order to win an election, has lost anyway.
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget. Image
User avatar

VMI77
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 25
Posts: 6096
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:49 pm
Location: Victoria, Texas

Re: 15 States Secede

#27

Post by VMI77 »

sjfcontrol wrote:
VMI77 wrote:
gdanaher wrote:Perhaps all those folks who find themselves dissatisfied with the election results should consider how they might adjust their party's political and social agendas to better dovetail with the views of the majority of the nation's population. It was all just fine and good when the nation was composed of angry old white men, but the party hasn't changed while everything else has. And while they are at it, they might want to give all their senatorial candidates a test or review session on female reproductive physiology. If they think they can win in the future and not make changes, they are just as foolish as those who think that seceding is a viable option.

Wow, talk about totally missing the point: this "angry old white man" REJECTS "the change." Your advice is the political equivalent of telling a rape victim that if she can't fight it she might as well relax and enjoy it. I'm not going to "adjust" my political and social agendas to appease the mob or merely surrender to collectivism out of convenience or some misplaced conception of inevitability. The current situation is not some accidental byproduct of social development, it's an engineered condition brought about by decades of collectivist control of the school system and MSM. I'm certainly not going to stop opposing this disastrous, immoral, and unnatural cabal of ideologues, opportunists, and free-loaders when things like homeschooling and the internet are arising in opposition to this treacherous attack on the fundamental principles that made the United States of America the greatest experiment in government and the greatest country in the world.
Seems to me that anybody willing to change their principles in order to win an election, has lost anyway.
You can only really change your principles under two conditions: 1) you get more data, evidence, etc. that leads you to the conclusion that a previously held principle was illogical or false; and 2) you don't have any principles to begin with. Changing your views to satisfy some imagined majority is not only unprincipled, it's venal and cowardly.
"Journalism, n. A job for people who flunked out of STEM courses, enjoy making up stories, and have no detectable integrity or morals."

From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com

equin
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 11
Posts: 321
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 1:17 am
Location: DFW

Re: 15 States Secede

#28

Post by equin »

VMI77 wrote:
equin wrote:Saw this on another forum. Call me a die-hard American patriot who still believes in America, but I respectfully disagree with secession. :patriot:

Many from Texas fought and died for these UNITED States, including Harlon Block shown in the famous flag-raising photo at the Battle of Iwo Jima (photo by Joe Rosenthal of the Associated Press):

[ Image ]

Sadly, many from Texas and other states and territories of the UNITED States continue to do so in Afghanistan.

States like Kalifornia, New Jersey, Maryland, and Connecticut are no longer really part of the United States, since the majority of their populations and their governments do not share the fundamental values and principles on which the United States was founded. America isn't a geographical location, it's the expression of fundamental values about the organization of government and the relationship between individuals and the State. Obama and a good number of his supporters are active enemies of those values. The men who fought in WW2 were fighting for a different country than what is represented by many of what I'll just call today's "blue states."

That said I don't believe there is any chance of succession short of some national catastrophic event that threatens to take the entire country down with the blue states.
I respectfully, but strongly disagree. Yes, it is true that the men who fought in WW2 were fighting for a country with a different social fabric than today, just as the men who fought and died at the battles of Valley Forge and Gettysburg were also fighting for a country different from that of the one in 1939-45. If you're implying, however, that our country during WW2 was somehow "more free" than it is today, I disagree. Let's not forget that J. Edgar Hoover, the former director of the FBI at that time, had his infamous list of potentially disloyal Americans and even proposed a plan to suspend the writ of habeas corpus at the outbreak of the Korean War (which, by the way, many Texans also fought and died in for the sake this great country). Let's also not forget the infamous "Jim Crow laws" and "separate but equal" (more like drastically inequal) segregation laws that many loyal African-Americans, including Texans and those brave men known as the Tuskegee Airmen), had to suffer and be humiliated with. So in that sense, yes, it was vastly different, but those days weren't any more "free" for freedom loving Americans and Texans than they are today. In fact, I don't think concealed carry was allowed under Texas law at that time, either.

As for California, New Jersey, Maryland, etc. somehow not being a part of the U.S., how so? I guarantee that if our country's enemies bomb and invade any one of the states you mentioned, I along with many other Americans and Texans, will gladly take up arms and fight to defend the U.S. and the American citizens of those states from foreign invaders. Are you saying that because the people of those states exercised their right to vote in a democratic election and the majority of the people of those states voted for a President whom a minority voted against that somehow those states no longer share the freedoms enjoyed by the U.S. Constitution? For one, none of those states UNANIMOUSLY voted Democratic. There was still a sizable percentage in each of those states who voted Republican. Secondly, the Republican party was able to exercise it's right to free speech and association by campaigning for the Republican candidate in each of those states without being arrested or imprisoned. Also, I'm not aware of any person who voted Republican being arrested or placed on some kind of blacklist in any of those states just for voting Republican. Thirdly, although many of those states unfortunately have stricter gun laws compared to our state, you can still hunt, fish, buy and shoot a firearm in each of those states. Yes, California has the infamously unpopular magazine-round restriction. But if its citizens wanted to, there is nothing in the laws of California, as guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, from allowing its citizens to vote to repeal such a law if the majority wanted to. The fact that a majority haven't, in my view, does not mean that it is no longer a part of the U.S.

Lastly, talks of secession in my opinion invoke unpatriotic defeatism, disloyalty to one's country and downright whining for the sake of whining of the loser, quitter attitude that is so un-American. It's akin to the unsportsmanslike behavior of one who is losing in a game to just quit for the sake of quitting because he can't stand being so inept and uncompetitive. Whatever happened to the capitalistic competitive drive that the Republican party once stood for? Is that what many in the Republican party have become? If so, no wonder the party's doomed! Sheesh! For once, how about if the party tried to educate the populace in areas where a majority has traditionally voted Democtratic? But quit and give up on one's country after so many have shed their blood defending it? I think not!

Some folks say it has nothing to do with the recent election but a lot to do with current challenges facing our country, like the huge national debt, illegal immigration, etc. Again, just secede and run away from challenges? And from Texans of all people, known for our history of facing impossible odds, such as at the Battle of the Alamo! I remember two years ago when Texas had a huge budget deficit of several billion dollars, despite the high sales and property taxes many of us have been paying. So are certain counties going to want to secede from Texas the next time we have a severe budget shortfall?

As for illegal immigration, I once worked for the INS long before it became ICE under Homeland Security. For one, it says a lot when so many from other parts of the world risk everything to come to our great country. For another, under the Reagan Administration the INS suffered severely from being woefully underfunded. It was Reagan who proposed and later signed into law the two various forms of Amnesty granting millions of illegal immigrants permanent residency and which set into motion the hope for future illegal immigrants the chance that more amnesties will be passed later on. The reason? Powerful agricultural interests lobbied and complained that Border Patrol would often swoop in and deport their source of dirt-cheap labor. The first kind of amnesty was strictly for undocumented agricultural workers, but when other business interests took note, the second kind of amnesty was made for all illegal immigrants who could prove they'd been in the U.S. for seven years without getting into any kind of trouble. Later during the Clinton Administration, the INS broke record after record, year after year, of the number of aliens deported, while massive amounts of money were invested to bring the INS back up to speed. So for Republicans to cry foul about illegal immigration when many powerful business interests who bankroll the party tend to benefit from this problem is truly ironic, especially so when Democrats are rhetorically blamed for being weak on immigration. It shouldn't be a partisan issue, but sadly it is, but I digress.

The point is that instead of quitting on America, I say do the American thing and don't quit! Continue to write Congress and the Senate. Exercise your freedom of speech and distribute newsletters and pamphlets to educate the populace. Look at the NRA for cripes sake! It's a master at exercising freedom of speech to educate America and defend our 2nd Amendment right to bear arms and defend ourselves! It hasn't given up on those states you mentioned and continues to lobby within them to change their laws for the better. Each one of the states you mentioned has IDPA matches similar to what we have here in Texas:

Maryland: http://www.mdshooters.com/showthread.php?t=92274" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

California: http://www.goldengate-idpa.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

New Jersey: http://www.sjidpa.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Connecticut: http://www.nwcsa.org/2011/04/idpa2011/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

On this day of Veteran's Day, I'm proud to be an American, and I thank those who fought, shed blood and died for this great country and for the freedoms we enjoy and often take for granted.

Image
(U.S. Air Force photo by Master Sgt. Jim Varhegyi)
Ed

recaffeination

Re: 15 States Secede

#29

Post by recaffeination »

Dave2 wrote:Also, they'd pretty much be saying that the American Experiment more or less failed, and that's not a statement to be made lightly.
Do we pay higher or lower taxes than our forefathers paid to King George? To Santa Anna?

Do we have more or fewer government hoops to jump through to legally buy and carry a firearm? Did our forefathers get groped to travel on a ticket they bought from someone to transport them between cities? Did King George or Santa Anna tell them what their children could learn in school? Did they force them to pay for unwanted medical care? Did they spy on our forefathers wholesale even BEFORE our forefathers rebelled?

I don't know the answers but I sure have my suspicions.
User avatar

Oldgringo
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 12
Posts: 11203
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:15 pm
Location: Pineywoods of east Texas

Re: 15 States Secede

#30

Post by Oldgringo »

And the winner is: equin! :patriot:
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”