I'll own my decision to change targets when I did, and the consequences. I was 100% certain I was the only non-employee on the range, and I also knew when I did it that I'd stand a chance of getting a talking-to about it. I don't have any issue with being called on that. It was never the content of "message" that I received, but rather how it was delivered. Let's be honest here, you don't really need to hear what somebody is saying to know whether they are being intentionally belittling vs. providing constructive feedback. It's easy to tell the difference between "loud" and "intimidating". From what I've seen myself in 2010, your guys liked to skip the preliminaries and go straight to "intimidating". It was very off-putting to watch it done to others, even more so when it was applied to me.QCRangeMaster wrote:RoyGBiv,
As RSOs we are trained to be loud so that we can be heard in spite of customers hearing protection. While I am known for being very loud on the range, I do not shout because I am angry or trying to berate anyone. On occasion customers wear both ear plugs and muffs and cannot hear any of the range commands so we have to raise our voices to be heard. This may be taken as “being mean” by bystanders, but we have to communicate when someone is in violation of a safety rule.
<snip>
I’m sorry but just because you are the only shooter on the pistol range, does not mean you may violate the hot range rule. Sorry. If they went overboard in telling you about that, well I will talk to them about that as well as ask them to be more attentive.
Of course I realize this was all a few years ago. Things could very well have changed for the better since then. Unfortunately, I was not able to shoot last week so I didn't get a chance to find out firsthand.