WildBill wrote:LEO: You got some ID?JALLEN wrote:A peace office might state it anywhere from "May I please see your driver's license, sir?" to "Got some ID, buddy!", or worse!
Redneck: 'Bout what?

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
WildBill wrote:LEO: You got some ID?JALLEN wrote:A peace office might state it anywhere from "May I please see your driver's license, sir?" to "Got some ID, buddy!", or worse!
Redneck: 'Bout what?
That reminds me of an incident many years ago. I was at my folks' home, on a visit. I pulled out of the driveway in my dad's car, and proceeded right into a police road block, less than a block from the house. Of course, I had a CA driver's license which set off all sorts of curiosity about why I was there, why was I driving this car with Texas plates etc. Pretty nosy, I thought. My dad's car, same name, etc. Pretty soon, one of the officers recognized me, he having been a classmate of one of my sisters. It's a small town, or was. Anyway he told me they did these things periodically as as many as a third of Texans in rural areas refused to get drivers' licenses. "Refused" sounds awfully deliberate... they just never did bother to get a license, and drove anyway.WildBill wrote:I wonder if some of the confusion and vagueness about the laws date back to the time when many people didn't have cars or drive. I know that both my grandmothers never got a drivers license. I don't know if they had state IDs.srothstein wrote:The Police Chief article is interesting, but can be more confusing than the situation is.
From stats I've seen, being a cop is a pretty safe job all said and done.kjolly wrote:I have nothing but respect for LEOs. They are out there doing a dangerous demanding job and I have no problem with identifying myself. Nothing to hide and though I have never been stopped in the years since aquiring my CHL would look forward to showing it.
Compared to what? Certainly safer than combat patrol in the sand, and probably safer than some of the more extreme "Dirty Jobs" shown on Mike Rowe's old show, but "safe" is a relative term and I'm just wondering to what you're relating your statement.jordanmills wrote:From stats I've seen, being a cop is a pretty safe job all said and done.kjolly wrote:I have nothing but respect for LEOs. They are out there doing a dangerous demanding job and I have no problem with identifying myself. Nothing to hide and though I have never been stopped in the years since aquiring my CHL would look forward to showing it.
Many of us remember the old paper DLs. How many of yall remember when the DL was just that & not considered ID. It was in the little plastic window holder w/ registration papers held around the sterring collum w/ the little stretchie springs.JALLEN wrote:The Texas drivers license I turned in 40 years ago was a pathetic little piece of paper not much more impressive than a supermarket receipt, not much to it. I'm looking forward to having a Texas driver's license again soon, though.WildBill wrote:I wonder if some of the confusion and vagueness about the laws date back to the time when many people didn't have cars or drive. I know that both my grandmothers never got a drivers license. I don't know if they had state IDs.srothstein wrote:The Police Chief article is interesting, but can be more confusing than the situation is.
It ranks way down the list of dangerous jobs.A-R wrote:Compared to what? Certainly safer than combat patrol in the sand, and probably safer than some of the more extreme "Dirty Jobs" shown on Mike Rowe's old show, but "safe" is a relative term and I'm just wondering to what you're relating your statement.
My point exactly - there are a few other more dangerous jobs, but being 10th most dangerous is by no means "pretty safe"Jumping Frog wrote:It ranks about 10th in terms of dangerous jobs.A-R wrote:Compared to what? Certainly safer than combat patrol in the sand, and probably safer than some of the more extreme "Dirty Jobs" shown on Mike Rowe's old show, but "safe" is a relative term and I'm just wondering to what you're relating your statement.
There are jobs that are far more dangerous. For example, commercial fisherman. Google it; you would be surprised
I edited my post to reflect some numbers.A-R wrote:My point exactly - there are a few other more dangerous jobs, but being 10th most dangerous is by no means "pretty safe"
Jumping Frog wrote:I edited my post to reflect some numbers.A-R wrote:My point exactly - there are a few other more dangerous jobs, but being 10th most dangerous is by no means "pretty safe"
LEO's are nowhere close to the top of the list in terms or mortality rate or the total number of fatalities.
However, being an LEO certainly is not "pretty safe", as you note. The overall average rate for all workers is about 3.9, so LEO is roughly five times more dangerous than the average worker.
Maybe.A-R wrote:Another thing to examine as well is the type and frequency of danger. A beat cop in a high crime area like parts of Detroit or Chicago is likely much more dangerous than a sheriff deputy in a relatively slow-paced rural area.
Right. And flash mobs don't steal anything. They just never did bother to pay, and took what they want anyway.JALLEN wrote:Anyway he told me they did these things periodically as as many as a third of Texans in rural areas refused to get drivers' licenses. "Refused" sounds awfully deliberate... they just never did bother to get a license, and drove anyway.
You forgot "U.S. President". 43 people have held that job, and 4 of them have been killed in office, making for a fatality rate of 9,302.3 per 100,000 workers.Jumping Frog wrote:It ranks way down the list of dangerous jobs.A-R wrote:Compared to what? Certainly safer than combat patrol in the sand, and probably safer than some of the more extreme "Dirty Jobs" shown on Mike Rowe's old show, but "safe" is a relative term and I'm just wondering to what you're relating your statement.
There are jobs that are far more dangerous. For example, commercial fisherman
LEO's have a fatality rate of 19.8 per 100,000 workers.
More dangerous profession include:
Farmers and ranchers 36.0
Fishers and related fishing workers 109.5
Logging workers 89.1
Construction laborers 20.8
Roofers 33.4
Structural iron and steel workers 33.4
Electrical power-line installers and repairers 27.6
Driver/sales workers and truck drivers 70.6
Refuse and recyclable material collectors 24.0
Coal mining 24.8
Support activities for mining 24.6
Taxi and limousine service 20.7
http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/cfoi/cfoi_rates_2007h.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
His statistics were from the 21st Century. There have been zero on-duty POTUS fatalities in the 21st Century.Katygunnut wrote:You forgot "U.S. President". 43 people have held that job, and 4 of them have been killed in office, making for a fatality rate of 9,302.3 per 100,000 workers.Jumping Frog wrote:http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/cfoi/cfoi_rates_2007h.pdf
Mine wasn't kept there. It was a pink square, maybe slightly rectangular, that was kept in my wallet so I could buy beer. It looked as though it had been typed in one of the ancient Remington manual typewriters. Of course, just about anyone could buy beer with that ID, as long as it said you were more than 21.longtooth wrote:Many of us remember the old paper DLs. How many of yall remember when the DL was just that & not considered ID. It was in the little plastic window holder w/ registration papers held around the sterring collum w/ the little stretchie springs.JALLEN wrote:
The Texas drivers license I turned in 40 years ago was a pathetic little piece of paper not much more impressive than a supermarket receipt, not much to it. I'm looking forward to having a Texas driver's license again soon, though.
Is that for the real statistics or does it exclude the 78% that are made up on the spot?JALLEN wrote:This thread drift about dangerous occupations is fascinating but you must know that 66.7% of statistics are misleading, and the rest are flat wrong.