Well, I agree with you that no-one sitting down to work on the legislation in this modern era had racist motivation. It simply had the unintended consequence of adversely affecting minorities.RoyGBiv wrote:I just don't buy that there's any racial MOTIVATION, today, behind the cost for a TX CHL.
But to call a high cost "racist", per-se, I don't agree.
Does a policy need to be deliberate to be "racist", or if it simply adversely affects a race is it thus "racist"? I don't know, and it is basically semantics I guess.