GAO Study

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Post Reply

Topic author
stash
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 850
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 9:04 am
Location: Woodcreek

GAO Study

#1

Post by stash »

Read in the paper yesterday the GAO (investigative arm of congress) recently conducted a study of active concealed weapons permits by state as of 12/31/2011. Texas was in the top five along with Florida, Pennsylvania, Georgia and Indiana.

Article did not indicate what the Feds interest in this was.
TSRA
NRA
TFC
USMC 1961-1966
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 26852
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: GAO Study

#2

Post by The Annoyed Man »

stash wrote:Article did not indicate what the Feds interest in this was.
That's the part that really bothers me. Why do the taxpayers of say.....California need to know how many CHL holders Texas has......since they helped to pay for it? I sincerely hope that the study consisted of no more than a phone call to each governor.

"How many ya got?"

"Put me down for 385,000."

It shouldn't have cost more than the salary of one clerical worker for one morning.......but I'll bet it didn't.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar

RSJ
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 555
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 10:18 am
Location: North Dallas

Re: GAO Study

#3

Post by RSJ »

stash wrote:Read in the paper yesterday the GAO (investigative arm of congress) recently conducted a study of active concealed weapons permits by state as of 12/31/2011. Texas was in the top five along with Florida, Pennsylvania, Georgia and Indiana.

Article did not indicate what the Feds interest in this was.
Thank you for the info! Somewhat surprised in these results!
NRA Member
User avatar

tomneal
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1183
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2004 2:26 pm
Location: Houston
Contact:

Re: GAO Study

#4

Post by tomneal »

There is or was a bill in congress to mandate CHL reciprocity from Washington DC.
Sounds like this study would have been more relevant than most of the studies I read about on the internet.
See you at the range
NRA Life, TSRA Life, USPSA Life, Mensa (not worth $50 per year so it's expired)
Tom (Retired May 2019) Neal
User avatar

gdanaher
Banned
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 670
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2010 8:38 am
Location: EM12

Re: GAO Study

#5

Post by gdanaher »

Don't assume that there is something sinister going on. There might be, but don't assume such. It might have something to do with the fees the feds charge to do the FBI check, The number of licenses per state checking out audit-wise with the revenue generated for the background checks might be an issue. Most federal agencies are supposed to provide optional services at no actual cost to the tax payer. Example: if a radio amateur requests a 'vanity' callsign, he has to pay a fee which has been calculated to cover the actual manpower costs of researching and issuing the license. Or, it might be a sinister action on the part of the feds.

Shoot_First
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 189
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 5:25 pm
Location: Texas

Re: GAO Study

#6

Post by Shoot_First »

Here's a link to the 90 page GAO study:

http://gao.gov/assets/600/592552.pdf

atticus
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 123
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 8:54 am

Re: GAO Study

#7

Post by atticus »

Perhaps the information helps the democrat congressional and senate re-election committees decide where and how to commit election resources. Maybe even Obama will pay attention to those numbers. Otherwise, not much obvious use for that information.
User avatar

RoyGBiv
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 9551
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:41 am
Location: Fort Worth

Re: GAO Study

#8

Post by RoyGBiv »

Can someone save me 90 pages of reading and tell me if the numbers in the OP are based on percent of population or just gross total number of permits?

Cheers. :tiphat:
I am not a lawyer. This is NOT legal advice.!
Nothing tempers idealism quite like the cold bath of reality.... SQLGeek

bkj
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 218
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 8:30 pm
Location: Houston
Contact:

Re: GAO Study

#9

Post by bkj »

RSJ wrote:
stash wrote:Read in the paper yesterday the GAO (investigative arm of congress) recently conducted a study of active concealed weapons permits by state as of 12/31/2011. Texas was in the top five along with Florida, Pennsylvania, Georgia and Indiana.

Article did not indicate what the Feds interest in this was.
Thank you for the info! Somewhat surprised in these results!

Pennsylvania has more NRA members then Texas
"When seconds count the police are minutes away" Nikki Goeser

“Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of authority…They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters.” Noah Webster
User avatar

RSJ
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 555
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 10:18 am
Location: North Dallas

Re: GAO Study

#10

Post by RSJ »

bkj wrote:
RSJ wrote:
stash wrote:Read in the paper yesterday the GAO (investigative arm of congress) recently conducted a study of active concealed weapons permits by state as of 12/31/2011. Texas was in the top five along with Florida, Pennsylvania, Georgia and Indiana.

Article did not indicate what the Feds interest in this was.
Thank you for the info! Somewhat surprised in these results!

Pennsylvania has more NRA members then Texas
really? per capita or total?????
NRA Member

fannypacker
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 185
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2009 2:15 pm
Location: Plano, TX

Re: GAO Study

#11

Post by fannypacker »

More waste of our money. A simple certified letter to each state should have brought the answer to them.
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”