It's pretty easy to get the out of state DL to match the out of state CHL if Texas legislators are foolish!Jumping Frog wrote:Always have a back-up plan.
TX Residents with out of state CHL
Re: TX Residents with out of state CHL
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 1186
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 7:42 pm
- Location: Henderson County, TX
Re: TX Residents with out of state CHL
Who is the hoplophobe?bizarrenormality wrote:Usually lower cost and less risk of being unnecessarily disarmed by a hoplophobe for starters.
The laws that forbid the carrying of arms... disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.
NRA Life Member
NRA Life Member
-
- Banned
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 1374
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 1:58 pm
Re: TX Residents with out of state CHL
Why would the TX legislators keep TX residents from obtaining a license from a state we have reciprocity with?Jumping Frog wrote:There is the pretty strong risk that the next legislative session will address TX residents and out of state CHL's, by requiring a TX resident to have a TX CHL.bizarrenormality wrote:More and more I think the out of state CHL is a better choice.
Always have a back-up plan.
Not that I want to see ANY reciprocity agreements go by the wayside, but if the license is recognized to have reciprocity, I cannot think of any legitimate reason why a Texan should not be able to hold it.
The Time is Now...
NRA Lifetime Member
NRA Lifetime Member
Re: TX Residents with out of state CHL
There are two competing theories that stand up to scrutiny. The first says follow the money. The second says Texas legislators have the emotional maturity of a six year old throwing a temper tantrum.steveincowtown wrote:Why would the TX legislators keep TX residents from obtaining a license from a state we have reciprocity with?Jumping Frog wrote:There is the pretty strong risk that the next legislative session will address TX residents and out of state CHL's, by requiring a TX resident to have a TX CHL.bizarrenormality wrote:More and more I think the out of state CHL is a better choice.
Always have a back-up plan.
Not that I want to see ANY reciprocity agreements go by the wayside, but if the license is recognized to have reciprocity, I cannot think of any legitimate reason why a Texan should not be able to hold it.
-
Topic author - Junior Member
- Posts in topic: 4
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 10:32 am
- Location: Austin
Re: TX Residents with out of state CHL
This.There are two competing theories that stand up to scrutiny. The first says follow the money. The second says Texas legislators have the emotional maturity of a six year old throwing a temper tantrum.
"I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it."
GOA life member
JPFO life member
GOA life member
JPFO life member
Re: TX Residents with out of state CHL
Watching the video of the campus carry hearings, I can believe the second theory.
When in doubt
Vote them out!
Vote them out!
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 6267
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
- Location: Flint, TX
MPA v. CHL
For those interested, Charles has said that srothstein's explanation is correct. You are not carrying under your CHL while driving. You DO still have to give an officer your CHL if stopped, however.
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=45095&p=548496&hili ... hl#p548496" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=46515&p=567782&hili ... hl#p567782" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
viewtopic.php?f=110&t=41043&p=498560&hi ... hl#p498560" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
viewtopic.php?f=110&t=41043&p=497834&hi ... hl#p497834" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=45095&p=548496&hili ... hl#p548496" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=46515&p=567782&hili ... hl#p567782" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
viewtopic.php?f=110&t=41043&p=498560&hi ... hl#p498560" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
viewtopic.php?f=110&t=41043&p=497834&hi ... hl#p497834" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget.
Never Forget.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 6267
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
- Location: Flint, TX
Re: TX Residents with out of state CHL
If you mean "less risk of being disarmed by an officer", not true. You must follow TX law (in Texas) regardless of where the license came from. So you must display the license to the officer, and he may disarm you. He *may* even be MORE likely to disarm you than someone with a TX CHL, simply because he's less sure of your knowledge of Texas law.bizarrenormality wrote:Usually lower cost and less risk of being unnecessarily disarmed by a hoplophobe for starters.
Other than officers, what hoplophobe do you think would disarm you, and why would an out-of-state CHL help?
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget.
Never Forget.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 1186
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 7:42 pm
- Location: Henderson County, TX
Re: TX Residents with out of state CHL
I had asked the same similar question and never received an answer.sjfcontrol wrote:Other than officers, what hoplophobe do you think would disarm you, and why would an out-of-state CHL help?
The laws that forbid the carrying of arms... disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.
NRA Life Member
NRA Life Member
Re: TX Residents with out of state CHL
If you're not outed by some database, concealed really is concealed.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 5:55 pm
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Re: TX Residents with out of state CHL
To the original question....I moved back to Texas in 2008. From Louisiana. My FLORIDA CWP showed my Louisiana address.
As required, I notified Florida of my new Texas address. I did not, however, pay the $25 fee to receive new plastic with my Texas address on it, as this was OPTIONAL to Florida. They only required the notification.
On three seperate occasions, in Texas, I have handed my Florida CWP (with a Louisiana address) and my Texas DL (with my current Texas address) to an LEO. Only once was it ever even commented on, and that was a mild "don't have your new Florida card yet?". When I explained that Florida had been updated, and they didn't require that a new card be issued, the subject was dropped.
Moot point, now that I have Texas CHL, but in my experience with LEO, a valid permit is a valid permit.
As required, I notified Florida of my new Texas address. I did not, however, pay the $25 fee to receive new plastic with my Texas address on it, as this was OPTIONAL to Florida. They only required the notification.
On three seperate occasions, in Texas, I have handed my Florida CWP (with a Louisiana address) and my Texas DL (with my current Texas address) to an LEO. Only once was it ever even commented on, and that was a mild "don't have your new Florida card yet?". When I explained that Florida had been updated, and they didn't require that a new card be issued, the subject was dropped.
Moot point, now that I have Texas CHL, but in my experience with LEO, a valid permit is a valid permit.
CHL timeline: 43 days mailbox to mailbox