http://blog.chron.com/newswatch/2012/02 ... armed-men/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I'm assuming that no CHL would have been required if the crime took place on the victim's property.
This could have been legally stopped by a non-CHL
This could have been legally stopped by a non-CHL
CHL since 2/2011
Glock 26, S&W 442, Ruger SP101 .357 3",
S&W M&P 40, Remington 870 Express 12 ga 18"
Glock 26, S&W 442, Ruger SP101 .357 3",
S&W M&P 40, Remington 870 Express 12 ga 18"
Re: This could have been legally stopped by a non-CHL
...habitually watch wife to and from her car...when dogs alert that someone's here, I go LOOK out the window...one big nose might discourage ne'er-do-wells...if not, one big .45 surely will...it's EVERY neighborhood now...
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 4159
- Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:01 pm
- Location: Northern DFW
Re: This could have been legally stopped by a non-CHL
The time to tell her father about the two men is BEFORE she opened the door. This could have turned out badly.Investigators said two men knocked on a door in the 4800 block of Knights Branch about 10 p.m. on Monday night. A woman who answered the door screamed and told her father about the two men, officials said.
6/23-8/13/10 -51 days to plastic
Dum Spiro, Spero
Dum Spiro, Spero
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 11454
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 5:15 pm
- Location: Plano
Re: This could have been legally stopped by a non-CHL
That report sounds odd. I am stuck on the part about the two guys being armed, knocking on the door and then running off because the man says to leave.
I am not saying something did not happen. I am just saying it seems like the information is incomplete.
I am not saying something did not happen. I am just saying it seems like the information is incomplete.
NRA-Endowment Member
http://www.planoair.com
http://www.planoairconditioningandheating.com
http://www.planoair.com
http://www.planoairconditioningandheating.com
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 4899
- Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 6:10 pm
- Location: Vidor, Tx
- Contact:
Re: This could have been legally stopped by a non-CHL
There is no mention of the father having a gun - - - the woman answered the door no mention of opening the door maybe she looked out the window or a peep hole. Strange the two armed men left when the father told them to. No CHL is needed on your own property or on property you have control of. I'm thinking there were some details omitted.
"To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason
Texas and Louisiana CHL Instructor, NRA Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun, Personal Protection and Refuse To Be A Victim Instructor
George Mason
Texas and Louisiana CHL Instructor, NRA Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun, Personal Protection and Refuse To Be A Victim Instructor
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 1560
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 11:19 am
- Location: Houston
Re: This could have been legally stopped by a non-CHL
I just saw this story and came to post it before noticing this thread.
Our first home was literally around the corner on Foxland Chase.
The story seemed odd to me as well. The men were 'only' about 4 feet inside their home after she darted off? Were they just standing there waiting for her to come back with the cash?? Very odd.
Our first home was literally around the corner on Foxland Chase.
The story seemed odd to me as well. The men were 'only' about 4 feet inside their home after she darted off? Were they just standing there waiting for her to come back with the cash?? Very odd.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 741
- Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 6:49 pm
Re: This could have been legally stopped by a non-CHL
It looks like he did stop it. The story says, " The thieves did not make off with anything, and no one was injured." That looks like a happy ending to me.rp_photo wrote:http://blog.chron.com/newswatch/2012/02 ... armed-men/
I'm assuming that no CHL would have been required if the crime took place on the victim's property.
I sincerely apologize to anybody I offended by suggesting the Second Amendment also applies to The People who don't work for the government.