BTW, I'm feeling a little smug about it because they published one of my letters to the editor in the October 2011 issue. If they published something I wrote, they have to be pretty smart, right?
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Mine was the second letter in response to the Savage/Ruger scout rifle tests. I said that the Steyr looked like it was designed by someone infatuated with Buck Rogers.eureka40 wrote:I've been getting it for a couple of years now. I agree with you about them not hyping, and giving fair and honest tests. It's a good magazine.
BTW, which letter was yours? The letters are my favorite part.
They seem to have rectified that.Rex B wrote:I did find it aggravating that they posted group sizes, but they almost never said at what range they tested it. I would think that is important.
Ha! I remember reading that one tooThe Annoyed Man wrote:Mine was the second letter in response to the Savage/Ruger scout rifle tests. I said that the Steyr looked like it was designed by someone infatuated with Buck Rogers.eureka40 wrote:I've been getting it for a couple of years now. I agree with you about them not hyping, and giving fair and honest tests. It's a good magazine.
BTW, which letter was yours? The letters are my favorite part.