Riots in London

Topics that do not fit anywhere else. Absolutely NO discussions of religion, race, or immigration!

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton


RPB
Banned
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 8697
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Riots in London

#61

Post by RPB »

Thanks Andy
allowing police to order thugs to remove masks or hoods

They can't now?
They need permission first?

Not sayin' that a few officers ordering hundreds of rioters to take their masks off will get the desired result, but ..

Just a different way of thinkin' I guess.
I'm no lawyer

"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"

bnc
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 548
Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 7:34 pm

Re: Riots in London

#62

Post by bnc »

I saw that on Amazon.co.uk aluminium baseball bat sales were up some 24000%


But instead of Britons regaining the right to defend themselves what we will see is that the government seize more power. And while the riots will wither away the governments new found power will not.
User avatar

G26ster
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2655
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 5:28 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Riots in London

#63

Post by G26ster »

bnc wrote:I saw that on Amazon.co.uk aluminium baseball bat sales were up some 24000%
.
That's due to the large number of baseball teams in the UK. "rlol"
User avatar

SQLGeek
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3269
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 1:48 am
Location: Richmond, TX

Re: Riots in London

#64

Post by SQLGeek »

AndyC wrote:
RPB wrote:Thanks Andy
allowing police to order thugs to remove masks or hoods

They can't now?
They need permission first?

Not sayin' that a few officers ordering hundreds of rioters to take their masks off will get the desired result, but ..

Just a different way of thinkin' I guess.
I noticed that too - cops over there seem to be handcuffed by their own rules, excuse the pun.

If I were in charge it would be something along the lines of "Fix bayonets! Front rank - kneel! Volley - fire! Charge!"

But what do I know - I'm just an uncouth Highlander with a love of cold steel in my DNA :evil2:
Why do I suddenly have this image of Andy running bayonet drill?

"THRUST! PARRY! RECOVER!"
Psalm 91:2

speedsix
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 5608
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 8:39 am

Re: Riots in London

#65

Post by speedsix »

...I think it'd be highly effective...a fixed bayonet would make an unarmed ME remember somewhere else I was late for an appointment...more intimidating than a gun...they oughta try it out....
User avatar

tacticool
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1486
Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 2:41 pm

Re: Riots in London

#66

Post by tacticool »

RPB wrote:Thanks Andy
allowing police to order thugs to remove masks or hoods

They can't now?
They need permission first?
The government doesn't want to appear intolerant of their religious and cultural traditions.
When in doubt
Vote them out!

chasfm11
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 4159
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:01 pm
Location: Northern DFW

Re: Riots in London

#67

Post by chasfm11 »

No surprise
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/ ... nment.html

The Telegraph
Monday 15 August 2011
Warning: Video bleeped for bad language

This is in regards to a 12 year old boy involved in the rioting.
"His mother, sitting beside the boy's father, wiped tears from her eyes as the court was told she handed him in after seeing wanted photos of her son being circulated by Greater Manchester Police."
"She is on benefits, does not live with the boy's father and has 10 other children, the court heard."

To paraphrase (omitting the bad language), the boy's mother says that it is all the government's fault because they don't do anything for the kids. :mad5
6/23-8/13/10 -51 days to plastic
Dum Spiro, Spero
User avatar

Excaliber
Moderator
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 6199
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 9:59 pm
Location: DFW Metro

Re: Riots in London

#68

Post by Excaliber »

tacticool wrote:
RPB wrote:Thanks Andy
allowing police to order thugs to remove masks or hoods

They can't now?
They need permission first?
The government doesn't want to appear intolerant of their religious and cultural traditions.
Apparently their tolerance extends to situations where those traditions are no religion and criminal culture.

They're reaping what they've sown.
Excaliber

"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." - Jeff Cooper
I am not a lawyer. Nothing in any of my posts should be construed as legal or professional advice.
User avatar

VMI77
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 6096
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:49 pm
Location: Victoria, Texas

Re: Riots in London

#69

Post by VMI77 »

chasfm11 wrote:No surprise
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/ ... nment.html

The Telegraph
Monday 15 August 2011
Warning: Video bleeped for bad language

This is in regards to a 12 year old boy involved in the rioting.
"His mother, sitting beside the boy's father, wiped tears from her eyes as the court was told she handed him in after seeing wanted photos of her son being circulated by Greater Manchester Police."
"She is on benefits, does not live with the boy's father and has 10 other children, the court heard."

To paraphrase (omitting the bad language), the boy's mother says that it is all the government's fault because they don't do anything for the kids. :mad5
But hey, the British government is going to crack down. Apparently they're even considering such drastic measures as not allowing those convicted in the rioting to ride public transportation for free anymore (unfortunately, while my comment may seem a little sarcastic, it is also true, according to the British media). So you see, with such harsh measures, they're taking this pretty seriously.
"Journalism, n. A job for people who flunked out of STEM courses, enjoy making up stories, and have no detectable integrity or morals."

From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com
Post Reply

Return to “Off-Topic”