Ruger LC9, My Thoughts and Opinions

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

Post Reply

Topic author
Salty1
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 924
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 7:44 pm

Ruger LC9, My Thoughts and Opinions

#1

Post by Salty1 »

Since a LC9 came in I decided to take it for a spin and see what it was made of. I was able to see one at the Shot Show and my initial impressions were positive. I would like to start by mentioning that I am not a fan of the LCP at all, there is nothing that I personally like about that gun. No flaming necessary, I know that many people and the amount of them sold tells me that many would disagree with my feelings on this.

Initial Impression:

The LC9 weighs in at 17.1 oz empty and the size fit my medium hands very well. It seemed to fit well in the back pocket of blue jeans although I did not have a holster to test with. I really like the profile and rounded edges, almost a “melted look. The gun can shoot +P ammo but is suggested that it does not receive a steady diet of it, +P+ ammo is to be avoided. The trigger system is double action only, hammer fired and it requires a long pull although it is smooth all the way through and is not “gritty”. Trigger reset requires releasing it almost all the way out before the next shot. There is no second strike capability (negative #1). The gun only comes with 1 mag that holds 7 rounds and has a finger grip extension installed and a flat bottom for those who want it for pocket carry.

As with all new firearms I break them down for a thorough inspection and cleaning. I found the breakdown to be a bit of a pain. After the typical remove the mag and check that it is unloaded the next step involves pushing down an access plate and utilizing the separate “key” to push a holding pin from the right side to the left for removal. Personally I see this as negative #2 as one will need to carry some type of small tool to break down the gun while in the field. Upon breaking it down the first thing I noticed the plastic recoil rod and a 2 spring set up, a smaller spring placed under a larger one. Now I am wondering exactly how much recoil to expect, I would replace the plastic rod with a metal one once they become available but that is just me. Once cleaned greased and assembled it was time to dry run the functionality. The gun has a mag safety, remove the mag and the trigger will not move, it also has a manual safety as well that is flicked off with ones thumb, for those who like a manual safety this is a plus, activating the safety was not as easy. It has adjustable 3 dot sights that for my older eyes are just a bit too small yet still manageable to see.

At the Range

I brought the Ruger to the range with my wife and met a good friend Greybeard there (it is his range) to take the LC9 for it‘s initial test run. I found the trigger to be as long as previously mentioned but it can be mastered with some practice. The first 7 rounds went without a hitch although the slide did not lock back after the last round was fired. This was the only time this happened and I feel it was just part of the break in process. After that the gun performed flawlessly. My wife did have some initial problems due to the trigger being so long and she anticipated the recoil and was shooting low. I need to get her to the range more often. Greybeard and I had no problems with it but it did take some getting used to and will require a good amount of range practice to master it and feel comfortable as a CCW. During a rapid fire exercise at 11 yards all rounds landed within the paper plate I used as a target, this was a plus and I feel the accuracy was excellent for such a short barrel and concealable handgun. I was actually amazed at the low recoil, I still cannot believe how manageable it was, I only shot Federal and Winchester and no +P yet, did not feel like feeding it $1.25 per round ammo during this initial test that will come later. I would have no problem attempting a 50 foot shot if the need ever arises with the LC9. This gun is surely a winner and I see it displacing many of the 380’s currently on the market once they become generally available. Forget the LCP’s and similar micro guns the LC9 is far superior in everyway and only slightly larger, plus shooting the 9mm will help keep some cash in your pockets or longer range sessions…… Being a so called “Sig Snob” this LC9 will join my Sigs in the safe and possibly on my waist. I never thought that I would own 2 Ruger’s, the LCR and LC9 should be included in best of breed and not overlooked when looking to add to the collection. Kudos to Ruger on the LC9, they nailed it with this affordable firearm.

I added in a few pictures of the LC9 and the rapid fire target as well as a size comparison to the LCP in case anybody is interested.

Image

Image
Image
Salty1

gemini
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1104
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 3:01 pm

Re: Ruger LC9, My Thoughts and Opinions

#2

Post by gemini »

Thanks for the info and review. Nicely done Salty1.

hirundo82
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1001
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 10:44 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Ruger LC9, My Thoughts and Opinions

#3

Post by hirundo82 »

I haven't had a chance to hold one of these yet. Is it small enough to be a pocket carry, or is it more of a belt gun?

Its dimensions seem pretty similar to a J-frame, so I'm thinking it would be fine in a pocket. Any chance of a size comparison with a snubby revolver?
"The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation." Barack Obama, 12/20/2007
User avatar

Teamless
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3241
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 9:51 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

Re: Ruger LC9, My Thoughts and Opinions

#4

Post by Teamless »

hirundo82 wrote: Is it small enough to be a pocket carry, or is it more of a belt gun?
i looked at one at The Arms Room the other day, and compared it to my Springfield XD9sc, the length is almost identical to my Springfield XD9sc.
I have been thinking about an LCP or TCP for when I am walking the dogs in shorts, but, for me anyway, to get a gun that is the same length as my XD9sc, seems silly, but the width does make it pocket-able --- there was a guy in the nylon type shorts there looking at it as well, and he slipped it into his pocket to see. i didn't notice how much it pulled down his shorts though with the 1lb + 1 oz weight.
League City, TX
Yankee born, but got to Texas as fast as I could! NRA / PSC / IANAL

Greybeard
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2410
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 10:57 pm
Location: Denton County
Contact:

Re: Ruger LC9, My Thoughts and Opinions

#5

Post by Greybeard »

Question: "Any chance of a size comparison with a snubby revolver?"

You may be in luck. ;-) I have a Handguns 101 class this afternoon and evening. I will let Rich speak for himself if time to come out and take some more photos of the LC9 in the midst of some of my smaller toys, including a LCR, S&W 340, and Kahr PM-9.

My initial impression of the LC9 - for what it is - is quite favorable. I had put at least 15 rounds through it before I slowed down to recognize that the recoil was not painful at all (at least to me). The trigger is not, and may never break in to be as smooth as the ones in the Kahrs, but the LC9 certainly does feel a bit thinner.
CHL Instructor since 1995
http://www.dentoncountysports.com "A Private Palace for Pistol Proficiency"

PostShooter
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 78
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 4:54 pm
Location: Atascocita, TX

Re: Ruger LC9, My Thoughts and Opinions

#6

Post by PostShooter »

I sure wish Ruger could pick up the production pace just a bit. Starting to get grumpy that they've been out for a month and a half, and I haven't even been able to drool over a gun shop case at one.

The Habernatho
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 81
Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 12:51 pm
Location: Nacogdoches

Re: Ruger LC9, My Thoughts and Opinions

#7

Post by The Habernatho »

Lose the manual safety, magazine disconnect, and loaded chamber indicator and put a better trigger on the gun, then maybe it would be better served as a CC gun. I'll stick with my PM9. Also a few photos for comparison (taken from Los from Defensivecarry.com)
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y6/los ... on-2-1.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y6/los ... STER-1.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y6/los ... ER3D-1.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

bobbb
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 31
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 8:29 pm
Location: Pasadena

Re: Ruger LC9, My Thoughts and Opinions

#8

Post by bobbb »

I liked my LC9 for the first 17 rounds..that's when the whole extractor assembly flew out of the gun. Sent it to Ruger 2 days ago.
Ruger LC9s
Ruger SR9c

hirundo82
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1001
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 10:44 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Ruger LC9, My Thoughts and Opinions

#9

Post by hirundo82 »

bobbb wrote:I liked my LC9 for the first 17 rounds..that's when the whole extractor assembly flew out of the gun. Sent it to Ruger 2 days ago.
That's why my policy is to not buy any gun until it has been out for 6 months. There seem to be way too many new guns coming out with poor quality control or design flaws, especially in the small autos.
"The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation." Barack Obama, 12/20/2007

JRG
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1037
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 7:57 pm
Location: Waxahachie, TX

Re: Ruger LC9, My Thoughts and Opinions

#10

Post by JRG »

I was thinking about the LC9, but am also thinking about a SR9C also. Too many decisions......

Great review!!

Joe :thumbs2:
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”