Electronic Fingerprinting…effective March 1st

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

KC5AV
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2117
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 5:24 pm
Location: Marshall

Re: Electronic Fingerprinting…effective March 1st

#16

Post by KC5AV »

Justin Franklin wrote:
RAM4171 wrote:I wonder what DPS has to gain from this being that L-1 is not the only e-fingerprinting business :grumble
I had mine done a place in Garland next door to Handgun Academy.
As it was explained to me, L-1 Identity Solutions was the only company that was able to meet the state's requirements for data security. There were a couple other reasons why they chose L-1, but I can't remember them right now.

I appreciate all the comments, but I was hoping to get some possible solutions for the issues I originally posted. Here they are again…

1. What can be done for those who can't make it during work week and the closest L-1 locations are not open on the weekend?

2. What can be done for the people who don't live close to an L-1 location and don't have the means for travel? Texas is a big state and I'm quite certain there are places where people will have to travel 90 miles or so to get to an L-1 location.

3. What can be done to get L-1 to allow more businesses to offer this service? FYI…I'm aware of a couple businesses that wanted to offer the electronic fingerprinting and L-1 turned them down because they already had another location within 20 miles or so. I'm not sure of the exact criteria, but it was something like that.
I'm afraid the only answer to number 1 will be to take a day or a half a day off from work.
Number2? I got nothing. Maybe bum a ride from a friend or relative.
Number3? The range where I instruct is one of those places.
I can only hope that after a year or so, the state will start to notice the number of complaints that roll in, and will either mandate that L-1 accept more franchises, provide better hours, or go back to accepting rolled prints. I don't expect either of those things to happen.
NRA lifetime member
User avatar

nyj
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 897
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 9:30 pm
Location: Austin

Re: Electronic Fingerprinting…effective March 1st

#17

Post by nyj »

I had mine done at L-1 yesterday and the machine gave a percentage rate for each print (95% PASS, 75% needed to pass). Dunno how the DPS could reject them if they pass on the machine.

I hear what you're saying, OP. I had to reschedule once because of my work schedule. They're hours aren't that great, especially the closing at 4:30 part.
User avatar

Oldgringo
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 11203
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:15 pm
Location: Pineywoods of east Texas

Re: Electronic Fingerprinting…effective March 1st

#18

Post by Oldgringo »

nyj wrote:I had mine done at L-1 yesterday and the machine gave a percentage rate for each print (95% PASS, 75% needed to pass). Dunno how the DPS could reject them if they pass on the machine.

I hear what you're saying, OP. I had to reschedule once because of my work schedule. They're hours aren't that great, especially the closing at 4:30 part.
If they have a monopoly on the state required services, they can set their own hours. Just sayin'...
User avatar

baldeagle
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5240
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:26 pm
Location: Richardson, TX

Re: Electronic Fingerprinting…effective March 1st

#19

Post by baldeagle »

Justin Franklin wrote:
RAM4171 wrote:I wonder what DPS has to gain from this being that L-1 is not the only e-fingerprinting business :grumble
I had mine done a place in Garland next door to Handgun Academy.
As it was explained to me, L-1 Identity Solutions was the only company that was able to meet the state's requirements for data security. There were a couple other reasons why they chose L-1, but I can't remember them right now.

I appreciate all the comments, but I was hoping to get some possible solutions for the issues I originally posted. Here they are again…

1. What can be done for those who can't make it during work week and the closest L-1 locations are not open on the weekend?

2. What can be done for the people who don't live close to an L-1 location and don't have the means for travel? Texas is a big state and I'm quite certain there are places where people will have to travel 90 miles or so to get to an L-1 location.

3. What can be done to get L-1 to allow more businesses to offer this service? FYI…I'm aware of a couple businesses that wanted to offer the electronic fingerprinting and L-1 turned them down because they already had another location within 20 miles or so. I'm not sure of the exact criteria, but it was something like that.
I think it's hard for most of us to answer these sorts of questions. L-1 provides online scheduling, so no matter where you live in the state you can arrange an appointment that's convenient for you (as convenient as possible.) According to their locations list they have a number of locations that accept Saturday appointments. If scheduling an appointment is difficult or impossible for someone, then I think that individual would have to contact DPS and ask for advice on how to proceed. Hopefully DPS has some useful suggestions for those sorts of folks. After all, they are the ones mandating the use of L-1 for fingerprints.
The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. James Madison
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member
User avatar

C-dub
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 13568
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Electronic Fingerprinting…effective March 1st

#20

Post by C-dub »

Do renewals have to submit prints again? I have done one renewal, but it was a few years ago and I don't remember if I did or not. I did my original and renewal class at The Bullet Trap with inked prints and have not been asked to have them redone.

If getting L-1 prints done is so difficult, does anyone think this requirement could be eliminated if someone were to challenge it in court?
I am not and have never been a LEO. My avatar is in honor of my friend, Dallas Police Sargent Michael Smith, who was murdered along with four other officers in Dallas on 7.7.2016.
NRA Patriot-Endowment Lifetime Member---------------------------------------------Si vis pacem, para bellum.................................................Patriot Guard Rider
User avatar

sjfcontrol
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Flint, TX

Re: Electronic Fingerprinting…effective March 1st

#21

Post by sjfcontrol »

C-dub wrote:Do renewals have to submit prints again? I have done one renewal, but it was a few years ago and I don't remember if I did or not. I did my original and renewal class at The Bullet Trap with inked prints and have not been asked to have them redone.

If getting L-1 prints done is so difficult, does anyone think this requirement could be eliminated if someone were to challenge it in court?
Renewals do NOT need prints or pictures, unless requested by DPS (or the applicant wants a new picture).
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget. Image
User avatar

Mastodon
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 279
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 1:56 pm
Location: far-West Texas

Re: Electronic Fingerprinting…effective March 1st

#22

Post by Mastodon »

sjfcontrol wrote:
C-dub wrote:Do renewals have to submit prints again? I have done one renewal, but it was a few years ago and I don't remember if I did or not. I did my original and renewal class at The Bullet Trap with inked prints and have not been asked to have them redone.

If getting L-1 prints done is so difficult, does anyone think this requirement could be eliminated if someone were to challenge it in court?
Renewals do NOT need prints or pictures, unless requested by DPS (or the applicant wants a new picture).
I was just about to ask this.

Thanks goodness they do not. I live in a remote area.
Chartered By The Republic of Texas in 1845

Image

NRA
TSRA

Μολών Λαβέ

wally775
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 321
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 6:31 pm
Location: Allen, TX

Re: Electronic Fingerprinting…effective March 1st

#23

Post by wally775 »

IMO

The DPS gets to receive prints in a manner that is consistent in presentation and accuracy
for their needs. It cuts down on the need to receive and handle additional paperwork and any type of storage for any amount of time. It is easier to hit delete or send than it is to shred or mail. In their mind it reduces cost and accelerates turnaround. The process isn’t perfect but it is easier than it used to be in the past. It will not always be the best for everyone but when fully implemented I believe (hope) it will speed up the process.
I also cannot believe there will not be a special needs process.

What you might not know is L-1 is Identix.
Identix makes the equipment. They are a biometrics technology company.
They are not unique to Texas. They make the equipment
L-1 uses and they are the actual holder of the contract with the state.
The equipment is not cheap. Even if they were to give a CHL instructor the franchise to
use the equipment the ROI at $10.00 a pop would be a long time coming. Most of us would not participate.
AIUI you have to be an operating storefront business to even apply for the L-1
franchise. That business needs to be involved in some type of related business activity.
Identix wants their equipment used for more than just processing CHL prints.

The total value of the contract in the world of state contracts and biometric technology
is not that enticing to the small number of companies that could even qualify to bid. I
think the landscape may change but not likely in the near future.

As to specific answers to the OP three questions I think they will have to come from DPS.

Just my thoughts based on what little (clearly demonstrated) knowledge I have.

JMHO, NASE, FWIW

:tiphat:
User avatar

MasterOfNone
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1276
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:00 am
Location: Dallas
Contact:

Re: Electronic Fingerprinting…effective March 1st

#24

Post by MasterOfNone »

It would be nice if DPS would push the electronic prints idea to all law enforcement. It makes so much sense for locals to be able to take electronic prints for all the same reasons that it helps the CHL process. If the electronic equipment were used by local LE, even if just each county could do it, it would address much of the concern about access to L-1.
http://www.PersonalPerimeter.com
DFW area LTC Instructor
NRA Pistol Instructor, Range Safety Officer, Recruiter

ZeeMan
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 45
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 11:01 pm
Location: San Angelo, TX

Re: Electronic Fingerprinting…effective March 1st

#25

Post by ZeeMan »

my L-1 location is the local school dist. office.....they ONLY take appts. tuesday from 9-5 ......
User avatar

Oldgringo
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 11203
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:15 pm
Location: Pineywoods of east Texas

Re: Electronic Fingerprinting…effective March 1st

#26

Post by Oldgringo »

What happened to the FAST electronic fingerprint folk?

(I wouldn't be askin' if it wasn't too cold to go outside and shoot or fish or somethin'. :smilelol5: )
User avatar

sjfcontrol
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Flint, TX

Re: Electronic Fingerprinting…effective March 1st

#27

Post by sjfcontrol »

FAST and L-1 are the same outfit (AFAICT)
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget. Image
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”