Lautenberg introduces high capacity mag ban

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton


KD5NRH
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3119
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 3:25 am
Location: Stephenville TX

Re: Lautenberg introduces high capacity mag ban

#31

Post by KD5NRH »

baldeagle wrote:Lautenberg is an idiot. The NYPD reports about a 28% hit rate in deadly force incidents. That means that, on average, a 33 round magazine would allow you to hit 8 bad guys once each or 4 bad guys twice or 2 bad guys four times each.
Or none 12 times each. Remember Miami, 1986; Platt wasn't stopped until the 12th hit.

Commander
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 755
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 9:55 am
Location: Rockwall, Texas

Re: Lautenberg introduces high capacity mag ban

#32

Post by Commander »

I've got this uneasy feeling that the Dems and anti-gunners will be successful in getting this thing passed by playing on emotion....like naming it the Gabriel Giffords Protection Act or something similar.....wouldn't surprise me to see prices of "high capacity" mags and guns start rising.....
"Happiness is a warm gun" - The Beatles - 1969


Commander

RPB
Banned
Posts in topic: 11
Posts: 8697
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Lautenberg introduces high capacity mag ban

#33

Post by RPB »

Commander wrote:I've got this uneasy feeling that the Dems and anti-gunners will be successful in getting this thing passed by playing on emotion....like naming it the Gabriel Giffords Protection Act or something similar.....wouldn't surprise me to see prices of "high capacity" mags and guns start rising.....
Already are; as sales increased for people who want to protect against 4 or 5 home invaders fearing they won't be available soon.
I'm no lawyer

"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
User avatar

whodat1
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 56
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 10:30 am
Location: Katy

Re: Lautenberg introduces high capacity mag ban

#34

Post by whodat1 »

Another CHL holder at work thought I was being absurd by having at least 6 mags (hi cap) for every pistol I own. I was waiting until a mag would go on sale and then buy a number of them over the last few years. He asked me why I bothered and I told him that I felt that since they were banned once they would probably be banned again. These things go in cycles. He said that it was absurd, the AW ban had been repealed and would never be put back in place again. :shock:
NRA Life Member
TSRA Member
User avatar

Mastodon
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 279
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 1:56 pm
Location: far-West Texas

Re: Lautenberg introduces high capacity mag ban

#35

Post by Mastodon »

To be honest, I just bought a hi-cap mag for my EDC, fearing that a ban may be looming. Thankfully mags of my full-size work in my EDC compact, so I do have a few full-size high-cap mag.

If money weren't a bit tight right now, I'd consider hunting for some more.

I hope it doesn't happen, doesn't make much sense. There is that precedent, however.
I just hope lawmakers take a deep-breath, count to 10, and sit around a table talking more about THE LUNATIC's abuse of an item. Not the item.

:???:
Chartered By The Republic of Texas in 1845

Image

NRA
TSRA

Μολών Λαβέ

RPB
Banned
Posts in topic: 11
Posts: 8697
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Lautenberg introduces high capacity mag ban

#36

Post by RPB »

I've been busy all day commenting on newspapers. tv stations etc ,,, forgot if I said it here but ...

NOT every wacko uses this or that gun or magazine or knife.
EVERY SINGLE ONE of these crazies trying to kill others wears shoes They help them get from place to place to hurt MORE people, and sometimes are used in escapes.
Ban shoes
I'm no lawyer

"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"

sailor2000
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 241
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 11:39 am

Re: Lautenberg introduces high capacity mag ban

#37

Post by sailor2000 »

Thank heavens Pelosi isn't speaker now or there would already have been a bill passed in the house banning hi cap mags and who knows what else.
It is useless for the Sheep to circulate petitions calling for universal vegetarianism while the Wolves hold a different opinion.
NRA Endowment Member

http://www.senioranswer.org" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar

Purplehood
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 4638
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:35 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Lautenberg introduces high capacity mag ban

#38

Post by Purplehood »

RPB wrote:I've been busy all day commenting on newspapers. tv stations etc ,,, forgot if I said it here but ...

NOT every wacko uses this or that gun or magazine or knife.
EVERY SINGLE ONE of these crazies trying to kill others wears shoes They help them get from place to place to hurt MORE people, and sometimes are used in escapes.
Ban shoes
Every night I plan on removing my shoes to reflect my solidarity with the Brady bunch.
Life NRA
USMC 76-93
USAR 99-07 (Retired)
OEF 06-07
User avatar

Mastodon
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 279
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 1:56 pm
Location: far-West Texas

Re: Lautenberg introduces high capacity mag ban

#39

Post by Mastodon »

RPB wrote:I've been busy all day commenting on newspapers. tv stations etc ,,, forgot if I said it here but ...

NOT every wacko uses this or that gun or magazine or knife.
EVERY SINGLE ONE of these crazies trying to kill others wears shoes They help them get from place to place to hurt MORE people, and sometimes are used in escapes.
Ban shoes
And highly consider a preemptive ban on roller skates and roller skate manufacturers.
Chartered By The Republic of Texas in 1845

Image

NRA
TSRA

Μολών Λαβέ

RPB
Banned
Posts in topic: 11
Posts: 8697
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Lautenberg introduces high capacity mag ban

#40

Post by RPB »

here's an antis blog I just posted 2 brief comments
TUCSON CITIZEN blog
http://tucsoncitizen.com/three-sonorans ... r-actions/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I'm no lawyer

"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 26852
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Lautenberg introduces high capacity mag ban

#41

Post by The Annoyed Man »

I was thinking of buying some 9 round magazines for my 1911. :smilelol5:
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar

sjfcontrol
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Flint, TX

Re: Lautenberg introduces high capacity mag ban

#42

Post by sjfcontrol »

Just ordered two 33-round mags for my Glock. They're getting hard to find.
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget. Image

RPB
Banned
Posts in topic: 11
Posts: 8697
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Lautenberg introduces high capacity mag ban

#43

Post by RPB »

sjfcontrol wrote:Just ordered two 33-round mags for my Glock. They're getting hard to find.
I used to own enough I wouldn't need more, but I'm not admitting to owning any right now ... yeah, I think I sold them :thumbs2:

Proposal to ban high-cap mags with NO GRANDFATHERING
viewtopic.php?f=94&t=41148" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I'm no lawyer

"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"

alvins

Re: Lautenberg introduces high capacity mag ban

#44

Post by alvins »

what i dont understand is everyone wants to ban weapons and such but pretty much anything can be turned into a weapon. i could impail someone in the chest with the pen on my desk if i wanted but no one considers that a weapon?
User avatar

tacticool
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 1486
Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 2:41 pm

Re: Lautenberg introduces high capacity mag ban

#45

Post by tacticool »

alvins wrote:what i dont understand is everyone wants to ban weapons and such but pretty much anything can be turned into a weapon. i could impail someone in the chest with the pen on my desk if i wanted but no one considers that a weapon?
That's fine if you want to murder someone. However, a pen or rat poison isn't very good for defending yourself against criminals. Makes you wonder at the real motives behind anti gun laws.
When in doubt
Vote them out!
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”