NRA to endorse Harry Reid?

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton


atticus
Member
Posts in topic: 10
Posts: 123
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 8:54 am

Re: NRA to endorse Harry Reid?

#61

Post by atticus »

Not to cut too fine a point, Reid is a nation-wide issue because he's the majority leader in the senate. His actions go way beyond the borders of Nevada and affect us all. But I understand your point. Moreover, I second your focus on good candidates, not just single-issue voting. We need the NRA and I appreciate what it does. But we have our own obligation to vote intelligently, and to work for good candidates. Moreover, we often forget the significance of political involvement at the local level: precinct work, school districts, utility and water districts, hospital districts. These are all matters that affect us directly, and on which we can have an immediate positive effect. Thanks for your post. :hurry:
User avatar

Charles L. Cotton
Site Admin
Posts in topic: 10
Posts: 17787
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX
Contact:

Re: NRA to endorse Harry Reid?

#62

Post by Charles L. Cotton »

magillapd wrote:The NRA does not get people elected, nor does any other organization.
We most certainly do! The highest profile NRA victories in recent elections was Gore and Kerry. The NRA absolutely did give Bush the victory. Our work at the local level has made the difference in many thousand of state and local elections as well.
magillapd wrote:No candidate should EVER be elected based on one single issue. What a voter needs to do is look at the candidate’s record, platform, and endorsements. With that, make an informed decision on who to vote for.
I respectfully disagree strongly with this premise. Thankfully, most NRA members do also, otherwise we would not be the largest and most effective civil rights organization in the country. I'm not saying issues other than guns are not important, but I am saying a candidate's stand on guns is a litmus test. If they are wrong on guns, there's no reason for me to look any further. If both candidates support my right to own and use guns, then I can and do look further.

Chas.

gmckinl
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 406
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 6:30 pm
Location: DFW-Area

Re: NRA to endorse Harry Reid?

#63

Post by gmckinl »

Charles L. Cotton wrote:I'm not saying issues other than guns are not important, but I am saying a candidate's stand on guns is a litmus test. If they are wrong on guns, there's no reason for me to look any further. Chas.
Agree completely. Any candidate must pass that test first, then I'll look deeper. A "nyet" vote there and they are out... no recovering from that failure. This article sums up my position http://www.lneilsmith.org/whyguns.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;. I have no issues with anything in that article.
NRA Life Member

"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it." -- Thomas Jefferson
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”