Houston man kills teen burglary suspect

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

sjfcontrol
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 6267
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:14 am
Location: Flint, TX

Re: Houston man kills teen burglary suspect

#16

Post by sjfcontrol »

seamusTX wrote:You're welcome.

BTW, if you search the web for "exploding dye pack," you can see how many robbers stuff the loot down their pants and suffer injuries to their manhood. I don't seem them suing, either. Most states prohibit lawsuits for injuries suffered during the commission of a felony.

Sheesh. Bring a bag for the loot. :???:

- Jim
Perhaps the bank's attempt at keeping the moron from reproducing? :clapping:
Range Rule: "The front gate lock is not an acceptable target."
Never Forget. Image

chabouk
Banned
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1219
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 7:01 am

Re: Houston man kills teen burglary suspect

#17

Post by chabouk »

Contrary to popular belief, you don't have to die to win the Darwin Award, just remove your genes from the pool. If an exploding dye pack does the job, you should be automatically nominated. :biggrinjester:
User avatar

Scott in Houston
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1560
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 11:19 am
Location: Houston

Re: Houston man kills teen burglary suspect

#18

Post by Scott in Houston »

I'd be concerned about at least a civil suit based on this statement the home owner made in that article:

“I didn't want him to die,” he said. “I didn't want him to get away, but I didn't want to kill him either.”


Doesn't that leave many possibilities to the hands of scumbag attorneys? Anyway, the world has one less thief in it, but the civil options seem to be a possible issue here. Unless there is immunity to suit in this scenario that I'm not aware of.
User avatar

Keith B
Moderator
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 18503
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: Houston man kills teen burglary suspect

#19

Post by Keith B »

G192627 wrote:I'd be concerned about at least a civil suit based on this statement the home owner made in that article:

“I didn't want him to die,” he said. “I didn't want him to get away, but I didn't want to kill him either.”


Doesn't that leave many possibilities to the hands of scumbag attorneys? Anyway, the world has one less thief in it, but the civil options seem to be a possible issue here. Unless there is immunity to suit in this scenario that I'm not aware of.
The Castle Doctrine helps protect the homeowner from lawsuits in the event of a justified shooting. While a lawyer could still file suit, they would be dumb in doing so as they know they would lose. So, any lawyer worth his salt will not take one of these cases.
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4
User avatar

seamusTX
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 13551
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:04 pm
Location: Galveston

Re: Houston man kills teen burglary suspect

#20

Post by seamusTX »

Civil Practice and Remedies Code 83.001, immunity from liability for justifiable use of deadly force.

- Jim
User avatar

Scott in Houston
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1560
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 11:19 am
Location: Houston

Re: Houston man kills teen burglary suspect

#21

Post by Scott in Houston »

Good to know! That is my 2nd biggest fear with regards to having to use force to protect myself.
User avatar

Bart
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 718
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:23 pm
Location: Deep in the Heart
Contact:

Re: Houston man kills teen burglary suspect

#22

Post by Bart »

Even if the criminal or his family don't have any money, I think you can ask the judge to make their attorney pay your attorney's costs, for being party to the frivolous lawsuit.
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”