Attempted Car-jack

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

roberts
Banned
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 293
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 2:24 pm

Re: Attempted Car-jack

#31

Post by roberts »

When it's time to shoot, shoot. Don't talk.

Image
THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS NOT ABOUT DUCK HUNTING
User avatar

Excaliber
Moderator
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 6198
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 9:59 pm
Location: DFW Metro

Re: Attempted Car-jack

#32

Post by Excaliber »

casingpoint wrote:Excalibur wrote:
In my opinion the best option would be a command: "Drop the gun - NOW!"
Agreed. But that's more for cops who have some training and experience along that line, not necessarily for others who are statutorily only empowered and taught primarily to use deadly force in self defense.
If you're alert and well trained
Most of us are probably deficient in both on a daily basis and will be lucky to pull a gun and get off a disabling shot, much less talk a perp down.
If you decide to use verbal tactics in a situation like that, you can't afford to be fuzzy. You need to tell the guy to do what you want him to do as clearly and with as few words as possible. A short, sharp command has the best chance of success. This has nothing to do with police authority or civilian status. The only difference between an LEO command and a civilian one in this situation is verbal annunciation of the LEO's authority - e.g. "POLICE!" Obviously, a civilian leaves this part out of his planning.

I agree that verbal tactics are not always (or even often) the best option for facing someone with a drawn firearm. The OP's friend felt he had more options and exercised them successfully, but that course of action was situation specific and may not be available next time.
Excaliber

"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." - Jeff Cooper
I am not a lawyer. Nothing in any of my posts should be construed as legal or professional advice.

Rex B
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3615
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 3:30 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Attempted Car-jack

#33

Post by Rex B »

dihappy wrote:Seriously? People actually pull guns out when a GUN is pointed at them?

If i was in my truck and someone pulled a gun on me at a traffic light, my foot would be on the pedal before you could blink!
:iagree:

And I'd probably flick the rear fender his way in passing.
-----------
“Sometimes there is no alternative to uncertainty except to await the arrival of more and better data.” C. Wunsch

wheelgun1958
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1125
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 10:40 pm
Location: Flo, TX

Re: Attempted Car-jack

#34

Post by wheelgun1958 »

Excaliber wrote:The only difference between an LEO command and a civilian one in this situation is verbal annunciation of the LEO's authority - e.g. "POLICE!" Obviously, a civilian leaves this part out of his planning.
If you are not in the military and subject to the UCMJ, you are a civilian. Recall the distinct effort of Ft Hood officials in their reporting that a civilian police officer stopped the attack.

flynbenny
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 149
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 11:29 am
Location: The Altered State, Colorado

Re: Attempted Car-jack

#35

Post by flynbenny »

dihappy wrote:Seriously? People actually pull guns out when a GUN is pointed at them?

If i was in my truck and someone pulled a gun on me at a traffic light, my foot would be on the pedal before you could blink!
My thoughts exactly. Escape would be faster than shooting I think...however if there isn't space enough to rapidly drive away I would shoot to stop, control, neutralize the threat. Backs up criminologist Gary Kleck's findings and John Lott's too very nicely.
Glock 19 Gen4 EDC, Glock 42 (golf gun), AR15 14.5" Midlength (nightstand gun), Browning Buckmark (fun gun)
User avatar

Excaliber
Moderator
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 6198
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 9:59 pm
Location: DFW Metro

Re: Attempted Car-jack

#36

Post by Excaliber »

wheelgun1958 wrote:
Excaliber wrote:The only difference between an LEO command and a civilian one in this situation is verbal annunciation of the LEO's authority - e.g. "POLICE!" Obviously, a civilian leaves this part out of his planning.
If you are not in the military and subject to the UCMJ, you are a civilian. Recall the distinct effort of Ft Hood officials in their reporting that a civilian police officer stopped the attack.
I find using "non-LEO" cumbersome, so I took a linguistic short cut.

You are correct, though, and I am aware of the distinction.

I guess I'll just have to get used to clumsy language on this point unless someone can suggest a slicker way of talking about regular folks who aren't cops.
Excaliber

"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." - Jeff Cooper
I am not a lawyer. Nothing in any of my posts should be construed as legal or professional advice.
User avatar

WildBill
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 17350
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Attempted Car-jack

#37

Post by WildBill »

Excaliber wrote:I guess I'll just have to get used to clumsy language on this point unless someone can suggest a slicker way of talking about regular folks who aren't cops.
On Adam-12 they called them citizens. ;-)
NRA Endowment Member
User avatar

joe817
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 9316
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 7:13 pm
Location: Arlington

Re: Attempted Car-jack

#38

Post by joe817 »

I find using "non-LEO" cumbersome, so I took a linguistic short cut.
I like linguistic short cuts. ;-) It's generally accepted and well known. Just because it's not politically correct, don't mean it's wrong. It's a lot easier to say than a mouth full of words to describe what we all know.

If you are not familiar with the term 'civilian' as used in this context, then I suggest you ain't been in Texas long enough. :mrgreen:

[the deliberate use of a vulgarism to make a point generally accepted as well] :tiphat:
Diplomacy is the Art of Letting Someone Have Your Way
TSRA
Colt Gov't Model .380

mymojo
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 276
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 10:26 pm
Location: Plano, Texxas

Re: Attempted Car-jack

#39

Post by mymojo »

Two things I learned from the movie "The Inctredibles":

1) NEVER start monologuing

2) NO CAPES!


(Talking while the BG already had a gun pulled was a dicey, dicey decision, IMO)
"Dialing 9-1-1 is wise.... Expecting them to arrive in time to save you is foolish." - Tsung Tzu, The Art of War

casingpoint
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 1447
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 9:53 pm

Re: Attempted Car-jack

#40

Post by casingpoint »

verbal annunciation of the LEO's authority - e.g. "POLICE!" Obviously, a civilian leaves this part out of his planning.
I don't know about that. I defy anyone to tell me the audible difference under stress between, "POLICE DROP THE GUN" and "PLEASE DROP THE GUN." No prosecutor will never be able to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt what you actually said in court. :evil2:

And if you really want to get the drop on 'em, just flip out one of these. Between the verbal commands and the bright flashes, they're as good as behind bars:
Image

stroo
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1682
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:46 pm
Location: Coppell

Re: Attempted Car-jack

#41

Post by stroo »

Several have suggested that they would have punch the accelerator and drove away. On that section of Mockingbird, he may not have had that option. It is very easy to get boxed in on that road.

Yelling "Drop the gun" or Drop the weapon" also tells any bystanders that you are being assaulted by a BG and may help if you need to go to a grand jury or beyond. In this case, considering the location on Mockingbird, I doubt there were any bystanders anyway.

eyesoftexas
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 7:49 pm

Re: Attempted Car-jack

#42

Post by eyesoftexas »

If it's bad enough to pull, it's bad enough to shoot.
YMMV.
User avatar

Excaliber
Moderator
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 6198
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 9:59 pm
Location: DFW Metro

Re: Attempted Car-jack

#43

Post by Excaliber »

WildBill wrote:
Excaliber wrote:I guess I'll just have to get used to clumsy language on this point unless someone can suggest a slicker way of talking about regular folks who aren't cops.
On Adam-12 they called them citizens. ;-)
That would solve the problem if it weren't for the fact that LEO's are citizens too.

I suppose we could start a whole new set of terminology for those with Level 1 arrest powers (citizens with the power to make a citizen's arrest) and Level 2 arrest powers (local LEO authority), and go up through levels 3 and 4 for state and federal jurisdiction.

(Sigh) It was so much easier when I could just call regular folks "civilians".
Excaliber

"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." - Jeff Cooper
I am not a lawyer. Nothing in any of my posts should be construed as legal or professional advice.
User avatar

KFP
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 724
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 4:11 pm
Location: McKinney, TX

Re: Attempted Car-jack

#44

Post by KFP »

stroo wrote:Several have suggested that they would have punch the accelerator and drove away. On that section of Mockingbird, he may not have had that option. It is very easy to get boxed in on that road.
No kidding! I think they managed to squeeze four lanes out of two!

This has impacted the image that I've had in my head of the altercation from the get go. In that area, the car doors could have been impossible to open and the car boxed in regardless of how well he attempted to plan.
Life Member NRA & TSRA
User avatar

ScottDLS
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5073
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 1:04 am
Location: DFW Area, TX

Re: Attempted Car-jack

#45

Post by ScottDLS »

KFP wrote:
stroo wrote:Several have suggested that they would have punch the accelerator and drove away. On that section of Mockingbird, he may not have had that option. It is very easy to get boxed in on that road.
No kidding! I think they managed to squeeze four lanes out of two!

This has impacted the image that I've had in my head of the altercation from the get go. In that area, the car doors could have been impossible to open and the car boxed in regardless of how well he attempted to plan.
It's all Monday morning quarterbacking and at the end of the day the victim of the car jacking survived. However, having worked that area late at night back before CHL, I can tell you I really wanted to carry a gun back then. We don't know all the details and personally I really hope I never in my life have to hurt or kill someone. However, if faced with a similar situation I might have pulled out my 9mm and just kept firing until the mag was empty. Scary, scary to think that I used to work out there in the wee hours completely unarmed, but that was 1992.
4/13/1996 Completed CHL Class, 4/16/1996 Fingerprints, Affidavits, and Application Mailed, 10/4/1996 Received CHL, renewed 1998, 2002, 2006, 2011, 2016...). "ATF... Uhhh...heh...heh....Alcohol, tobacco, and GUNS!! Cool!!!!"
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”