Need Input on Pocket Carry Guns

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

Post Reply

Which One for Pocket Carry??

Kel-Tec PF-9
1
4%
Kel-Tec P-11
1
4%
Kel-Tec P-3AT
14
52%
Kahr PM9
11
41%
 
Total votes: 27


Topic author
Braden
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 310
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 12:43 am
Location: Texas

Need Input on Pocket Carry Guns

#1

Post by Braden »

I want to get a good pocket carry gun and I've pretty much narrowed it down to one of the following. I'm looking for input regarding the pros and cons of each. Those of you who own or have owned one of these models please chime in with your input.

Kahr PM9 - I've heard nothing bad about these guns when it comes to pocket carry except that Kahr has been having QC problems lately. Also, in my opinion they're a bit pricey for what you're getting.

Kel-Tec PF-9 - Looks like a good gun but it's unproven and not exactly on the market yet. I'm sure it will be difficult to find for some time and I need to get something fairly soon. Don't know about price.

Kel-Tec P-11 - Is this too big for pocket carry? Seems to be a proven gun with a good reputation and reasonably priced. Probably my first choice if it will easily conceal in a pocket.

Kel-Tec P-3AT - This is my last choice because I don't really want to go less than 9mm but also my first choice due to its size. Seems to be very popular as a pocket gun or BUG and is reasonably priced.

For those of you who will suggest some sort of revolver, I appreciate your input but I'd prefer to stick with one of the above. :)

Thanks in advance for your thoughts.
"I can do all things through Him who strengthens me." - Philippians 4:13

spud
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 294
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 1:49 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

#2

Post by spud »

Love my P3AT. If you get one, order a Bersa .380 mag fuinger extension. Alout of people complain of problems. I have not had one yet.

Image

j1132s
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 463
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 12:37 am

#3

Post by j1132s »

I have 2 Kahr PM9 separated by almost a year between their purchases, and both have been completely reliable. I pocket carry mine, and it just disappears in almost any of my pants/shorts.
User avatar

MoJo
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 4899
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 6:10 pm
Location: Vidor, Tx
Contact:

#4

Post by MoJo »

My current pocket carry gun is the P3AT in a DeSantis Nemisis holster. It looks like a wallet in my pocket. I carry it weak side front pants pocket. I also have a P11 that has ridden in a pocket from time to time. It's OK if you are wearing looser fitting pants like Dockers, etc. Not to be carried in tight fitting Wranglers. ;-)
"To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them."
George Mason
Texas and Louisiana CHL Instructor, NRA Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun, Personal Protection and Refuse To Be A Victim Instructor

rodc13
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 29
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:31 am
Location: San Antonio, Texas

#5

Post by rodc13 »

My young bride and I both carry P3ATs. Mine is first generation and hers second. Neither have ever had a problem and they're sufficiently accurate under 10 yards. I carry mine as a BUG (to my Ultra CDP primary) in a pocket holster that looks like a wallet. Loaded with Gold Dots, currently.

I wouldn't go smaller than .380, and I agree, a larger caliber would be preferable. But for size and concealability, with acceptable performance, I don't think you can do much better, although I would like to have a S & W 340PD!
Cheers,
Rod

Topic author
Braden
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 310
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 12:43 am
Location: Texas

#6

Post by Braden »

Thanks for the input so far and thanks for voting in the poll. Right now it looks like the majority of you favor the P-3AT.

Keep the comments coming!! :cool:
"I can do all things through Him who strengthens me." - Philippians 4:13
User avatar

HighVelocity
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3374
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: DFW, TX
Contact:

#7

Post by HighVelocity »

I voted for the Kahr. Yes, they cost more but the triggers on Keltecs that I've tried were just plain horrible.
I am scared of empty guns and keep mine loaded at all times. The family knows the guns are loaded and treats them with respect. Loaded guns cause few accidents; empty guns kill people every year. -Elmer Keith. 1961

kw5kw
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 837
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 12:18 pm
Location: Fort Worth, Texas

#8

Post by kw5kw »

HighVelocity wrote:I voted for the Kahr. Yes, they cost more but the triggers on Keltecs that I've tried were just plain horrible.
+1

I had a P-11 that I never fired a round thru. I dry-fired it three times and decided that DAO 11lb trigger just wasn't for my finger. There would be no way that I could have fired one full magazine with that stout trigger pull. I traded it off less than a week later.

I had one of their little P-32's for 5 years, and finally got tired of the rim-lock of the .32ACP cartridge, and traded it for a P-11 (see above). If I was going to buy another K-T it'd be the little .380, what ever model number it is as it's right at the same size as the P-32 but has a much more reliable cartridge (9x17).

Russ
Russ
kw5kw

Retired DPS Communications Operator PCO III January 2014.

Topic author
Braden
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 310
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 12:43 am
Location: Texas

#9

Post by Braden »

That's the P-3AT (get it...three eighty??).

I wonder if the P-11 trigger has changed? Their website says it is a 9 lb trigger pull.
"I can do all things through Him who strengthens me." - Philippians 4:13

Jfreeman
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 41
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 12:43 pm
Location: Plano

#10

Post by Jfreeman »

what about the Kahr CW 9?

Texasdoc
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 598
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 10:30 pm
Location: LaGrange, Texas
Contact:

#11

Post by Texasdoc »

Hey Braden, I have had the P-3AT and it is a hell of a carry gun its easy to conceal. .I would go for the P-3AT.

300 shooter
Shoot more,then Reload and Shoot somemore. Image

http://www.texasguntalk.com

Image

ElGato
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1073
Joined: Sun Dec 26, 2004 7:35 am
Location: Texas City, Texas
Contact:

#12

Post by ElGato »

If you want to stay with a 9mm I have to vote Kahr.
http://www.tomestepshooting.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I'm better at retirement than anything I have ever tried. Me
Young People pratice to get better, Old folk's pratice to keep from getting WORSE. Me
User avatar

jbirds1210
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3368
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 5:36 pm
Location: Texas City, Texas

#13

Post by jbirds1210 »

HighVelocity wrote:I voted for the Kahr. Yes, they cost more but the triggers on Keltecs that I've tried were just plain horrible.
I have to agree with that....The first (and only) time I shot a Keltec, I really thought that I had forgotten to chamber a round. It seemed five miles long with a big surprise...the recoil was brutal! I have no idea what model it was.
Jason
NRA Life Member
TSRA Life Member

"No man stands so tall as when he stoops to help a child."

bauerdj
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 395
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2005 12:28 am
Location: Conroe, Texas

#14

Post by bauerdj »

Trigger pull I didn't find too bad, at least it did not seem to seriously affect my accuarcy. In fact I find the accuracy outstanding for such a little handgun. The recoil is definately snappish, but then so is my S & W 638. Light + high power (relatively) = recoil.

This is not a gun you take to the range for the pleasure of it, but then thats not what it was designed for.

I will hold my vote until I get my P3AT back from Kel Tec and see if they have solved the reliability issue.

Dave B.
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”