The Republicans Dodged a Bullet there

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

Dudley
Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 95
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 5:37 pm

Re: The Republicans Dodged a Bullet there

#61

Post by Dudley »

rm9792 wrote:I would be in favor of a true, graduated by income levels flat tax.
I'm in favor of flat mountains and wet deserts.
If you think health care is expensive now, wait until it's free.

Zee
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 10
Posts: 290
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 3:09 pm
Location: Maybe a little left from you.

Re: The Republicans Dodged a Bullet there

#62

Post by Zee »

I'm fascinated by the range of beliefs I read and I spend time here to try to understand them and I ask question when things aren't immediately clear to me.

I'm confused by the incredible disrespect I see that accompanies differences of opinion. These seems to be a very small portion of the posters but I'm wondering and so these are fair questions:

Does difference of opinion require disrespect?
If someone's view is different does it mean mocking and belittling are now OK?
80% Liberal, 90% Democrat, 100% Responsible gun owner.

Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservative. John Stuart Mill (1806-1873)

Jesus was a Jewish Liberal
User avatar

pdubyoo
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 381
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 10:23 am
Location: Spring, TX

Re: The Republicans Dodged a Bullet there

#63

Post by pdubyoo »

surprise_i'm_armed wrote:03lightningrocks:

To answer your above post about the differences between liberals and conservatives:

Although the Republican mantra about personal responsibility is well-known,
it's a heck of a way to run an airline when corporate profits belong to the corporation
and its shareholders, but gargantuan losses are socialized to the taxpaying citizens of
the country to absorb.

Who is reponsible for the losses? It's not Joe Workerbee, but Joe has to pay for the
failed risks of the corporations. The companies keep the profits when times are good,
then the same companies expect to be bailed out by DC.

Who is reponsible for this shifting of corporate loss to the citizens? Bush, Jr. started
it at the end of his term, but Obama is continuing it.


It's unsettling to see billions in taxpayer dollars given away over a weekend to corporations
whose failed bets didn't work out, while getting anything substantive done in DC doesn't
happen.

SIA
You're right about that...Bush was responsible, but not solely. I dare say that I have not heard of one single conservative that agreed with "W" on his initiation of gooberment bailouts. :mad5 That was certainly a gigantic bonehead move!

EDIT TO ADD: As a matter of fact, the only folks I've seen in favor of the bailouts were the unions and the DC elite...Pelosi, Reid, Frank...you know, that crowd. The same folks who are currently trying to cram a massive healthcare bill down our throats.
Nov. 2010...Check!
Nov. 2012...Don't Give Up!
Jan. 2013...True Change!
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”