CompVest wrote:Not have DPS run it. It is a civilian license not a LEO thing.
![I Agree :iagree:](./images/smilies/iagree.gif)
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
CompVest wrote:Not have DPS run it. It is a civilian license not a LEO thing.
Vermont and Alaska both have serious weaknesses, including gun-free zones, and Alaska lacks strong preemption.mgood wrote:A Vermont/Alaska system would be ideal, IMO, though maybe not very realistic at this time.
Getting close, but I would also say that any delays need to be explained in person, at a place of the applicant's choosing, by the DPS director, who must be wearing handcuffs at the time, not later than day 15chabouk wrote:-- Fast issue (NH, 14 days, and if they fail to comply they have to pay your legal fees if you take it to court)
Plus all that could be done now and incredibly cheaper. But then we'd have to cut a government budget.jsimmons wrote:I would do this:
1) Make application electronic (it already is).
2) If using electronic application, the applicant's PIN code is issued immediately upon submission of application.
2) Reduce fee if using electronic application.
4) Allow instructors to submit passport photos and fingerprints electronically. This would serve the purpose of indicating that the applicant passed the course.
5) Background checks should be done electronically by access a national database (that does in fact already exist). These checks should be done immediately upon submission of photos/fingerprints.
6) The background check should be used to verify the age, veteran status, and LEO status of the applicant. This would be used to further reduce the fee charged to the applicant.
7) If the background check raises a flag of any kind, the application is routed to a human for clarification and/or final rejection.
8) Problems with photos/fingerprints could also be handled electronically by communicating the issue with the applicant via an automated email requesting new material directly from the applicant.
9) If everything goes through without raising any flags, the license is automatically created and mailed.
The whole process could take less than a week if done this way.
POST OF THE DAY!Purplehood wrote:Eliminate the requirement for a CHL?
I would rather a secure locker be provided at court houses (and at least this should be done) with armed attendants. I am a very calm and pragmatic person, but I can speak from personal experience that in one case, if I had had it on me I may well have used it.austinrealtor wrote: 5. Licensed CHL may carry on premises of polling place and in courtrooms/court offices. Intentional failure to conceal ("brandishing") without the "defense to prosecution" of legally justified self defense goes up a notch to a felony instead of Class A misdemeanor if committed in these areas. At courtrooms, CHL holder must pro-actively show CHL to court officials before entering any metal detector. Court official/LEO will pull CHL holder aside and verify all information and check for other contraband before allow CHL holder to enter.