Gun Seizure during disasters

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

Post Reply

Topic author
Commander
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 755
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 9:55 am
Location: Rockwall, Texas

Gun Seizure during disasters

#1

Post by Commander »

We all remember the gun seizures in Lousiana after Katrina. While studying the Texas CHL laws, I found the following:

LGC §229.001. FIREARMS; EXPLOSIVES. (a) A municipality may
not adopt regulations relating to the transfer, private ownership,
keeping, transportation, licensing, or registration of firearms, ammunition,
or firearm supplies.
(b) Subsection (a) does not affect the authority a municipality has
under another law to:

(4) regulate the use of firearms in the case of an insurrection, riot,
or natural disaster if the municipality finds the regulations necessary to
protect public health and safety;


If I am reading this correctly, this law gives Texas Cities the same powers that officials used in New Orleans last year.
"Happiness is a warm gun" - The Beatles - 1969


Commander

KBCraig
Banned
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5251
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 3:32 am
Location: Texarkana

#2

Post by KBCraig »

Yes, I noticed that when I was researching the law about our local housing authority banning guns. I meant to start a thread on it, and kept forgetting it.

This is something that must change in 2007!

Kevin

txinvestigator
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 4331
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 6:40 pm
Location: DFW area
Contact:

Re: Gun Seizure during disasters

#3

Post by txinvestigator »

S&W6946 wrote:We all remember the gun seizures in Lousiana after Katrina. While studying the Texas CHL laws, I found the following:

LGC §229.001. FIREARMS; EXPLOSIVES. (a) A municipality may
not adopt regulations relating to the transfer, private ownership,
keeping, transportation, licensing, or registration of firearms, ammunition,
or firearm supplies.
(b) Subsection (a) does not affect the authority a municipality has
under another law to:

(4) regulate the use of firearms in the case of an insurrection, riot,
or natural disaster if the municipality finds the regulations necessary to
protect public health and safety;


If I am reading this correctly, this law gives Texas Cities the same powers that officials used in New Orleans last year.
Use is not the same as transfer, ownership, transportation, etc.
*CHL Instructor*


"Speed is Fine, but accuracy is final"- Bill Jordan

Remember those who died, remember those who killed them.
User avatar

seamusTX
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 13551
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:04 pm
Location: Galveston

#4

Post by seamusTX »

I am not a lawyer, but I don't think so. The first clause says, "A municipality may not adopt regulations relating to the transfer, private ownership, keeping, transportation, licensing, or registration of firearms, ..."

The exception applies only to "use."

I would expect that if this law were used at all, it would be to prevent people patrolling the neighborhood in armed groups and that sort of thing. I have not heard of that happening in Texas.

It will all be moot soon. The U.S. House and Senate have both passed bills prohibiting states and municipalities from confiscating firearms during emergencies. They have to be reconciled in a conference committee, and no doubt signed by the President before the next hurricane. See http://www.nra-ila.org/ for details.

- Jim
Last edited by seamusTX on Mon Aug 07, 2006 7:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Venus Pax
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3147
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 5:27 pm
Location: SE Texas

#5

Post by Venus Pax »

It would be nice to see a law passed in TX to prevent confiscation.

I do know that after Rita hit, DPS let private citizens ride around Bridge City (my family lived there at the time) with shotguns and patrol the area. They figured the private citizens knew best who belonged there.
I also understand that there were signs up that said, "You loot. We shoot."
"If a man breaks in your house, he ain't there for iced tea." Mom & Dad.

The NRA & TSRA are a bargain; they're much cheaper than the cold, dead hands experience.

spud
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 294
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 1:49 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

#6

Post by spud »

If anyone asks, I sold them.
User avatar

Charles L. Cotton
Site Admin
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 17787
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX
Contact:

#7

Post by Charles L. Cotton »

Venus Pax wrote:It would be nice to see a law passed in TX to prevent confiscation.
:thumbsup:
User avatar

sparx
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 249
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 11:50 am
Location: North Richland Hills, TX
Contact:

#8

Post by sparx »

spud wrote:If anyone asks, I sold them.
to buy all of mine. ;-)
NRA, TSRA, TXGR, SAF, GOA & FPC
"I'm not terrified of guns, I'm terrified of gun-free zones!"

robert_de_niro
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 59
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Amarillo
Contact:

#9

Post by robert_de_niro »

KBCraig wrote:Yes, I noticed that when I was researching the law about our local housing authority banning guns. I meant to start a thread on it, and kept forgetting it.

This is something that must change in 2007!

Kevin
But how many would actually obey it? If I had people breaking into my place to loot where my family was, and they were armed with knives and guns like in New Orleans, I'd say the state could have my guns if they could come take them from me. "From my cold, dead fingers".
Image

spud
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 294
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 1:49 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

#10

Post by spud »

sparx wrote:
spud wrote:If anyone asks, I sold them.
to buy all of mine. ;-)
haha agreed.
User avatar

flintknapper
Banned
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 4962
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 8:40 pm
Location: Deep East Texas

#11

Post by flintknapper »

robert_de_niro wrote:
KBCraig wrote:Kevin
I'd say the state could have my guns if they could come take them from me. .


Yup! Molôn Labé! :grin: :grin:
Spartans ask not how many, but where!
User avatar

stevie_d_64
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 7590
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 11:17 pm
Location: 77504

#12

Post by stevie_d_64 »

...regulate the use...

So If I wanted to use mine in such a manner as Davy Crockett did at teh Alamo...

They can regulate that action if they want to.../sarcasm

I just don't see me doing that though...

We just had a recent test of this theory...The bad rain storms a few weeks ago...

I turned the dunderhead traffic around coming down my street to wash up flood water into our homes very effectively...

Only one dunderhead found out why when they actually tested me on the request...

"Why should I turn around?"

"Because I said so!" (A locked and loaded AR make quite a visual deterrent and statement)

Local Law Enforcement had ZERO problem with my determined stance, they had other things to deal with than a homeowner protecting their property in this manner...
"Perseverance and Preparedness triumph over Procrastination and Paranoia every time.” -- Steve
NRA - Life Member
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
Μολών λαβέ!
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”