I emphasize the "might", as the "experts" are reading between the lines so to speak.
If it does happen, once again, a lib will replace a lib; but once again, the clock will be reset significantly as Stevens is 89 years old.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/ ... TE=DEFAULT" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Now Justice Stevens might retire?
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
Topic author - Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 199
- Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 1:47 pm
- Location: Sealy, Tx
Now Justice Stevens might retire?
Harry
NRA Endowment Life Member
Sig P239-40
"Health nuts are going to feel stupid someday, lying in hospitals dying of nothing."
NRA Endowment Life Member
Sig P239-40
"Health nuts are going to feel stupid someday, lying in hospitals dying of nothing."
-
- Junior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 9:12 am
- Location: Houston
Re: Now Justice Stevens might retire?
Well, he is 90+ years old. It won't really change the court until Kennedy moves on.
All men are equal before God: wisdom, talents, and virtue are the only difference between them - Napoleon
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 381
- Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 10:23 am
- Location: Spring, TX
Re: Now Justice Stevens might retire?
Your right, the balance shouldn't change any when Stevens retires. However, the potential replacements that are being discussed are, well, frightening!
Now, keep in mind that this is coming from a very liberal rag, The LA Times, but as I have said many times in other threads, the extreme liberal's strategy is to attack from EVERY angle. This article is rather lack-luster, and doesn't really say anything new that we didn't already know, but the very last sentence is a little peak behind the curtains, into the depths of radical extremism this administration is capable of.
Now, keep in mind that this is coming from a very liberal rag, The LA Times, but as I have said many times in other threads, the extreme liberal's strategy is to attack from EVERY angle. This article is rather lack-luster, and doesn't really say anything new that we didn't already know, but the very last sentence is a little peak behind the curtains, into the depths of radical extremism this administration is capable of.
Scared yet?? The good news is that Sunstein is way too radical to even be considered by Congress, but the thought process is there.http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld ... 1894.story
Another possible candidate for a Supreme Court seat would be former University of Chicago and Harvard Law School professor Cass R. Sunstein, who was chosen by Obama to head a regulatory affairs office in the White House.
Nov. 2010...Check!
Nov. 2012...Don't Give Up!
Jan. 2013...True Change!
Nov. 2012...Don't Give Up!
Jan. 2013...True Change!
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 564
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 1:21 pm
- Location: Flower Mound
Re: Now Justice Stevens might retire?
As the WH has already greased the skids for Sunstein's nomination at some point, this is alarming. A fruit loop ike Sunstein on the bench would make a change to the lifetime appointments and necessitate the ability to have a justice removed by the people.
Jeff B.
Jeff B.
Don’t ever let someone get away with telling you that no one wants to take your guns. - Joe Huffman
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 1447
- Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 9:53 pm
Re: Now Justice Stevens might retire?
A fruit loop like Sunstein
Understatement of the year. Imagine the offspring of cross-breeding Sunstein to Lani Guinier, another whackadoo legal scholar of the Clinton era.